A Survey of the General Public's Views on the Ethics of Using AI in Education

被引:9
|
作者
Latham, Annabel [1 ]
Goltz, Sean [2 ]
机构
[1] Manchester Metropolitan Univ, Manchester M1 5GD, Lancs, England
[2] Edith Cowan Univ, Business & Law Sch, Perth, WA, Australia
关键词
Ethics; Trust; GDPR; INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-23204-7_17
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Recent scandals arising from the use of algorithms for user profiling to further political and marketing gain have popularized the debate over the ethical and legal implications of using such 'artificial intelligence' in social media. The need for a legal framework to protect the general public's data is not new, yet it is not clear whether recent changes in data protection law in Europe, with the introduction of the GDPR, have highlighted the importance of privacy and led to a healthy concern from the general public over online user tracking and use of data. Like search engines, social media and online shopping platforms, intelligent tutoring systems aim to personalize learning and thus also rely on algorithms that automatically profile individual learner traits. A number of studies have been published on user perceptions of trust in robots and computer agents. Unsurprisingly, studies of AI in education have focused on efficacy, so the extent of learner awareness, and acceptance, of tracking and profiling algorithms remains unexplored. This paper discusses the ethical and legal considerations for, and presents a case study examining the general public's views of, AI in education. A survey was recently taken of attendees at a national science festival event highlighting state-of-the-art AI technologies in education. Whilst most participants (77%) were worried about the use of their data, in learning systems fewer than 8% of adults were 'not happy' being tracked, as opposed to nearly two-thirds (63%) of children surveyed.
引用
收藏
页码:194 / 206
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Public Views on Genetics and Genetic Testing: A Survey of the General Public in Belgium
    Chokoshvili, Davit
    Belmans, Carmen
    Poncelet, Roxanne
    Sanders, Sofie
    Vaes, Deborah
    Vears, Danya
    Janssens, Sandra
    Huys, Isabelle
    Borry, Pascal
    GENETIC TESTING AND MOLECULAR BIOMARKERS, 2017, 21 (03) : 195 - 201
  • [2] Lessons of history: Ethics & the public's views of science & society
    Moore, R
    Jensen, M
    Hsu, L
    Hatch, J
    AMERICAN BIOLOGY TEACHER, 2003, 65 (02): : 85 - 89
  • [3] Education for AI, not AI for Education: The Role of Education and Ethics in National AI Policy Strategies
    Schiff, Daniel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN EDUCATION, 2022, 32 (03) : 527 - 563
  • [4] Survey: How's your ethics education?
    Roush, DL
    Dowell, DK
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING, 1997, 97 (02) : T16 - +
  • [5] Education for AI, not AI for Education: The Role of Education and Ethics in National AI Policy Strategies
    Daniel Schiff
    International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2022, 32 : 527 - 563
  • [6] Cross Sectional Survey of the Scottish General Public's Awareness of, Views on, and Attitudes Toward Nonmedical Prescribing
    Stewart, Derek C.
    George, Johnson
    Diack, H. Lesley
    Bond, Christine M.
    McCaig, Dorothy J.
    Cunningham, I. T. Scott
    Munro, Kim
    Pfleger, David
    ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2009, 43 (06) : 1115 - 1121
  • [7] Public Ethics of Care-A General Public Ethics
    Stensoeta, Helena Olofsdotter
    ETHICS AND SOCIAL WELFARE, 2015, 9 (02) : 183 - 200
  • [8] Results of a national survey on ethics education in general surgery residency programs
    Downing, MT
    Way, DP
    Caniano, DA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1997, 174 (03): : 364 - 368
  • [9] Emerging challenges in AI and the need for AI ethics education
    Jason Borenstein
    Ayanna Howard
    AI and Ethics, 2021, 1 (1): : 61 - 65
  • [10] Preservice ethics teachers' perceptions of AI ethics education
    Song, Aeri
    Ko, Junga
    JOURNAL OF MORAL EDUCATION, 2024,