Experimental study of consumer responses to different sources of information about prescription drugs

被引:0
|
作者
Byl, Jacob P. [1 ]
Viscusi, W. Kip [2 ]
机构
[1] Western Kentucky Univ, Bowling Green, KY 42101 USA
[2] Univ Distinguished Prof Law, Econ & Management Vanderbilt Law Sch, 131 21st Ave, Nashville, TN 37203 USA
关键词
Risk updating; Experimental; Bayesian learning; Attorney advertising; Litigation advertising; Direct-to-consumer advertising; Prescription drugs; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; RISK; BEHAVIOR; DECISIONS; HEALTH; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jebo.2020.10.025
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Consumers receive risk information about prescription drugs from many sources, including from largely unregulated attorney advertisements. This experiment measures subjective risk beliefs about prescription drugs and subjects' drug-taking behavior in an incentivized setting. Results of the experiment are used to estimate a Bayesian learning model to ascertain the risk levels implied by different information sources and the informational weights subjects place on these sources. Even after people have received scientifically based drug risk information from a doctor and product label, attorney litigation advertising boosts risk beliefs about side effects by an average of 16 out of 100 cases, which is roughly a 50% increase over baseline risk beliefs. Risk beliefs have a significant effect on drug-taking behavior in an incentivized environment. Experience with taking the drug also feeds back into the learning process about risk beliefs. Our experimental results help formalize how consumers update risk beliefs and suggest ways to encourage a learning environment that avoids alarmist updating based on information sources like attorney advertising. (c) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:754 / 771
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluating information in consumer advertisements of prescription drugs
    Sullivan, DL
    ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2001, 35 (11) : 1494 - 1494
  • [2] SOURCES OF INFORMATION ABOUT DRUGS
    SHEPPARD, MA
    JOURNAL OF DRUG EDUCATION, 1980, 10 (03) : 257 - 262
  • [3] Direct-to-Consumer Information and Advertising for Prescription Drugs
    Gress, S.
    Maas, S.
    Wasem, J.
    GESUNDHEITSOEKONOMIE UND QUALITAETSMANAGEMENT, 2008, 13 (01): : 19 - 24
  • [4] CREDIBILITY OF SOURCES OF INFORMATION ABOUT DRUGS
    SINNETT, ER
    PRESS, A
    BATES, RA
    HARVEY, WM
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1975, 36 (01) : 299 - 309
  • [5] Consumer believability of information in direct-to-consumer (DTC) advertising of prescription drugs
    Beltramini, RF
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2006, 63 (04) : 333 - 343
  • [6] Consumer Believability of Information in Direct-to-Consumer (DTC) Advertising of Prescription Drugs
    Richard F. Beltramini
    Journal of Business Ethics, 2006, 63 : 333 - 343
  • [7] Public responses to direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs
    Yuan, Sheng
    JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING RESEARCH, 2008, 48 (01) : 30 - 41
  • [8] CONSUMER INFORMATION ABOUT PRENATAL AND OBSTETRIC DRUGS
    MCMANUS, KA
    BRACKBILL, Y
    WOODWARD, L
    DOERING, P
    ROBINSON, D
    WOMEN & HEALTH, 1982, 7 (01) : 15 - 29
  • [9] Social pharmacology of the information about prescription drugs on the internet
    Juarez-Gimenez, Juan Carlos
    Padulles-Zarnora, Nuria
    Lalueza-Broto, Pilar
    Girona-Brumos, Lourdes
    MEDICINA CLINICA, 2007, 129 (14): : 558 - 559
  • [10] Randomized Study of Placebo and Framing Information in Direct-to-Consumer Print Advertisements for Prescription Drugs
    O'Donoghue, Amie C.
    Sullivan, Helen W.
    Aikin, Kathryn J.
    ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2014, 48 (03) : 311 - 322