Return of individual results in epilepsy genomic research: A view from the field

被引:7
|
作者
Ottman, Ruth [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Freyer, Catharine [5 ]
Mefford, Heather C. [6 ]
Poduri, Annapurna [7 ,8 ]
Lowenstein, Daniel H. [5 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Dept Epidemiol, New York, NY USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Dept Neurol, New York, NY USA
[3] Columbia Univ, GH Sergievsky Ctr, 630 W 168th St,P&S Box 16, New York, NY 10032 USA
[4] New York State Psychiat Inst & Hosp, Div Translat Epidemiol, New York, NY 10032 USA
[5] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Neurol, San Francisco, CA USA
[6] Univ Washington, Dept Pediat, Div Med Genet, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[7] Boston Childrens Hosp, Div Epilepsy & Clin Neurophysiol, Dept Neurol, Epilepsy Genet Program, Boston, MA USA
[8] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Neurol, Boston, MA USA
关键词
epileptic encephalopathy; genetics; pathogenic variants; research ethics; SELF-GUIDED MANAGEMENT; DE-NOVO MUTATIONS; RESEARCH PARTICIPANTS; INCIDENTAL FINDINGS; INFORMED-CONSENT; PUBLIC EXPECTATIONS; CLINICAL-RESEARCH; GENETIC RESEARCH; PREFERENCES; UTILITY;
D O I
10.1111/epi.14530
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Genomic findings are emerging rapidly in 2 large, closely related epilepsy research consortia: the Epilepsy Phenome/Genome Project and Epi4K. Disclosure of individual results to participants in genomic research is increasingly viewed as an ethical obligation, but strategies for return of results were not included in the design of these consortia, raising complexities in establishing criteria for which results to offer, determining participant preferences, managing the large number of sites involved, and covering associated costs. Here, we describe the challenges faced, alternative approaches considered, and progress to date. Experience from these 2 consortia illustrates the importance, for genomic research in epilepsy and other disorders, of including a specific plan for return of results in the study design, with financial support for obtaining clinical confirmation and providing ongoing support for participants. Participant preferences for return of results should be established at the time of enrollment, and methods for allowing future contacts with participants should be included. In addition, methods should be developed for summarizing meaningful, comprehensible information about findings in the aggregate that participants can access in an ongoing way.
引用
收藏
页码:1635 / 1642
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] IRB perspectives on the return of individual results from genomic research
    Dressler, Lynn G.
    Smolek, Sondra
    Ponsaran, Roselle
    Markey, Janell M.
    Starks, Helene
    Gerson, Nancy
    Lewis, Susan
    Press, Nancy
    Juengst, Eric
    Wiesner, Georgia L.
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2012, 14 (02) : 215 - 222
  • [2] Return of individual research results from genomic research: A systematic review of stakeholder perspectives
    Vears, Danya F.
    Minion, Joel T.
    Roberts, Stephanie J.
    Cummings, James
    Machirori, Mavis
    Blell, Mwenza
    Budin-Ljosne, Isabelle
    Cowley, Lorraine
    Dyke, Stephanie O. M.
    Gaff, Clara
    Green, Robert
    Hall, Alison
    Johns, Amber L.
    Knoppers, Bartha M.
    Mulrine, Stephanie
    Patch, Christine
    Winkler, Eva
    Murtagh, Madeleine J.
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (11):
  • [3] Adolescent perspectives on the return of individual results in genomic addiction research
    Coors, Marilyn E.
    Raymond, Kristen M.
    McWilliams, Shannon K.
    Hopfer, Christian J.
    Mikulich-Gilbertson, Susan K.
    PSYCHIATRIC GENETICS, 2015, 25 (03) : 127 - 130
  • [4] Return of individual genomic research results: are laws and policies keeping step?
    Adrian Thorogood
    Gratien Dalpé
    Bartha Maria Knoppers
    European Journal of Human Genetics, 2019, 27 : 535 - 546
  • [5] Return of individual genomic research results: are laws and policies keeping step?
    Thorogood, Adrian
    Dalpe, Gratien
    Knoppers, Bartha Maria
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2019, 27 (04) : 535 - 546
  • [6] Return of individual research results: Policies and experiences of cancer genomic researchers.
    Dressier, Lynn G.
    Zeps, Nikolajs
    Deal, Allison Mary
    Markey, Janell
    Knoppers, Bartha
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 32 (15)
  • [7] The Development of a Preference-Setting Model for the Return of Individual Genomic Research Results
    Bacon, Phoebe L.
    Harris, Erin D.
    Ziniel, Sonja I.
    Savage, Sarah K.
    Weitzman, Elissa R.
    Green, Robert C.
    Huntington, Noelle L.
    Holm, Ingrid A.
    JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2015, 10 (02) : 107 - 120
  • [8] Return of individual genomic research results within the PRAEGNANT multicenter registry study
    Hanna Huebner
    Matthias Ruebner
    Christian Kurbacher
    Peyman Hadji
    Andreas D. Hartkopf
    Michael P. Lux
    Jens Huober
    Sabrina Uhrig
    Florin-Andrei Taran
    Friedrich Overkamp
    Hans Tesch
    Lothar Häberle
    Diana Lüftner
    Markus Wallwiener
    Volkmar Müller
    Matthias W. Beckmann
    Alexander Hein
    Erik Belleville
    Michael Untch
    Wolfgang Janni
    Tanja N. Fehm
    Hans-Christian Kolberg
    Diethelm Wallwiener
    Sara Y. Brucker
    Andreas Schneeweiss
    Johannes Ettl
    Peter A. Fasching
    Laura L. Michel
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2023, 197 : 355 - 368
  • [9] Return of individual genomic research results within the PRAEGNANT multicenter registry study
    Huebner, Hanna
    Ruebner, Matthias
    Kurbacher, Christian
    Hadji, Peyman
    Hartkopf, Andreas D.
    Lux, Michael P.
    Huober, Jens
    Uhrig, Sabrina
    Taran, Florin-Andrei
    Overkamp, Friedrich
    Tesch, Hans
    Haeberle, Lothar
    Lueftner, Diana
    Wallwiener, Markus
    Mueller, Volkmar
    Beckmann, Matthias W.
    Hein, Alexander
    Belleville, Erik
    Untch, Michael
    Janni, Wolfgang
    Fehm, Tanja N.
    Kolberg, Hans-Christian
    Wallwiener, Diethelm
    Brucker, Sara Y.
    Schneeweiss, Andreas
    Ettl, Johannes
    Fasching, Peter A.
    Michel, Laura L.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2023, 197 (02) : 355 - 368
  • [10] Pediatric Research and the Return of Individual Research Results
    Avard, Denise
    Senecal, Karine
    Madadi, Parvaz
    Sinnett, Daniel
    JOURNAL OF LAW MEDICINE & ETHICS, 2011, 39 (04): : 593 - 604