Amphotericin B versus fluconazole for controlling fungal infections in neutropenic cancer patients

被引:5
|
作者
Johansen, Helle Krogh [1 ]
Gotzsche, Peter C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rigshosp, Nord Cochrane Ctr, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
Amphotericin B [therapeutic use; Antifungal Agents [therapeutic use; Confidence Intervals; Fluconazole [therapeutic use; Mycoses [drug therapy; etiology; Neoplasms [complications; Neutropenia [complications; Odds Ratio; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Humans; EMPIRIC ANTIFUNGAL THERAPY; MARROW-TRANSPLANTATION; CANDIDA INFECTIONS; ORAL FLUCONAZOLE; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; PREVENTION; METAANALYSIS; MULTICENTER; CHEMOTHERAPY; PROPHYLAXIS;
D O I
10.1002/14651858.CD000239.pub2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Systemic fungal infection is considered to be an important cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients, particularly those with neutropenia. Antifungal drugs are often given prophylactically, or empirically to patients with persistent fever. Objectives To compare the effect of fluconazole and amphotericin B onmorbidity and mortality in patients with cancer complicated by neutropenia. Search methods We searched PubMed from 1966 to 7 July 2014 and the reference lists of identified articles. Selection criteria Randomised clinical trials comparing fluconazole with amphotericin B. Data collection and analysis The two review authors independently assessed trial eligibility and risk of bias, and abstracted data. Main results Seventeen trials (3798 patients, 381 deaths) were included. In two large three-armed trials, results for amphotericin B were combined with results for nystatin in a 'polyene' group. Because nystatin is an ineffective drug in these circumstances, this approach creates a bias in favour of fluconazole. Furthermore, most patients were randomised to oral amphotericin B, which is poorly absorbed and poorly documented. There was overlap among the 'polyene' trials but we were unable to obtain any information from the trial authors or from Pfizer, the manufacturer of fluconazole, to clarify these issues. There were no significant differences in effect between fluconazole and amphotericin B, but the confidence intervals were wide. More patients dropped out of the study when they received amphotericin B, but as none of the trials were blinded decisions on premature interruption of therapy could have been biased. Furthermore, amphotericin B was not given under optimal circumstances, with premedication to reduce infusion-related toxicity, slow infusion, and with fluid, potassium and magnesium supplements to prevent nephrotoxicity. The major harms were hepatic impairment and gastrointestinal adverse effects with fluconazole and infusion-related toxicity, renal impairment and gastrointestinal adverse effects with amphotericin B. For the 2011 and 2014 updates no additional trials were identified for inclusion. Authors' conclusions Amphotericin B has been disfavoured in several of the trials through their design or analysis, or both. Since intravenous amphotericin B is the only antifungal agent for which an effect on mortality has been shown, and since it is considerably cheaper than fluconazole, it should be the preferred agent.
引用
收藏
页数:40
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Fluconazole versus amphotericin B in febrile neutropenic patients with cancer
    Allan R. Tunkel
    Current Infectious Disease Reports, 2000, 2 (5) : 389 - 390
  • [2] Fluconazole versus amphotericin B for the prevention of fungal infection in neutropenic patients with hematologic malignancy
    Takatsuka, H
    Takemoto, Y
    Okamoto, T
    Fujimori, Y
    Tamura, S
    Wada, H
    Okada, M
    Kanamaru, A
    Kakishita, E
    DRUGS UNDER EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1999, 25 (04) : 193 - 200
  • [3] Itraconazole versus amphotericin B plus nystatin in the prophylaxis of fungal infections in neutropenic cancer patients
    Boogaerts, M
    Maertens, J
    van Hoof, A
    de Bock, R
    Fillet, G
    Peetermans, M
    Selleslag, D
    Vandercam, B
    Vandewoude, K
    Zachée, P
    De Beule, K
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2001, 48 (01) : 97 - 103
  • [4] AMPHOTERICIN-B OR KETOCONAZOLE THERAPY OF FUNGAL-INFECTIONS IN NEUTROPENIC CANCER-PATIENTS
    FAINSTEIN, V
    BODEY, GP
    ELTING, L
    MAKSYMIUK, A
    KEATING, M
    MCCREDIE, KB
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1987, 31 (01) : 11 - 15
  • [5] A multicenter, randomized trial of fluconazole versus amphotericin B for empiric antifungal therapy of febrile neutropenic patients with cancer
    Winston, DJ
    Hathorn, JW
    Schuster, MG
    Schiller, GJ
    Territo, MC
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 108 (04): : 282 - 289
  • [6] FLUCONAZOLE VERSUS ORAL AMPHOTERICIN-B IN PREVENTING FUNGAL INFECTION IN CHEMOTHERAPY-INDUCED NEUTROPENIC PATIENTS WITH HEMATOLOGICAL MALIGNANCIES
    AKIYAMA, H
    MORI, S
    TANIKAWA, S
    SAKAMAKI, H
    ONOZAWA, Y
    MYCOSES, 1993, 36 (11-12) : 373 - 378
  • [7] Early empiric antifungal therapy of infections in neutropenic patients comparing fluconazole with amphotericin B/flucytosine
    Silling, G
    Fegeler, W
    Roos, N
    Essink, M
    Büchner, T
    MYCOSES, 1999, 42 : 101 - 104
  • [8] FLUCONAZOLE OR AMPHOTERICIN FOR CANDIDOSIS IN NEUTROPENIC PATIENTS
    SOUTAR, RL
    LANCET, 1991, 337 (8734): : 181 - 181
  • [9] Voriconazole versus amphotericin B or fluconazole in cancer patients with neutropenia
    Jorgensen, Karsten Juhl
    Gotzsche, Peter C.
    Dalboge, Christina S.
    Johansen, Helle Krogh
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2014, (02):
  • [10] Amphotericin B colloidal dispersion (Amphocil) vs fluconazole for the prevention of fungal infections in neutropenic patients:: data of a prematurely stopped clinical trial
    Timmers, GJ
    Zweegman, S
    Simoons-Smit, AM
    van Loenen, AC
    Touw, D
    Huijgens, PC
    BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2000, 25 (08) : 879 - 884