A likelihood-ratio framework for evaluating results of forensic gunshot- residue analysis

被引:5
|
作者
Osnat, Israelsohn Azulay [1 ]
Hila, Rosengarten [1 ]
Amit, Cohen [1 ]
Yigal, Zidon [1 ]
Zohar, Pasternak [2 ]
机构
[1] Israel Police, Toolmark & Mat Lab, Dept Identificat & Forens Sci DIFS, IL-91906 Jerusalem, Israel
[2] Israel Police, Qual Assurance & Evidence, Dept Identificat & Forens Sci DIFS, IL-91906 Jerusalem, Israel
关键词
GSR; Shooting incident; LR; Statistics; Gunshot residue; PROBABILISTIC EVIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT; POLICE OFFICERS; HANDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.forsciint.2022.111339
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律]; R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
0301 ; 10 ;
摘要
When reporting results of Gunshot Residue (GSR) analysis from a person suspected to be involved in a recent shooting, most forensic experts only provide the court with the raw results (i.e. the number of GSR particles found) and a disclaimer that a positive finding does not prove that the suspect was involved in a firearm shooting incident whilst a negative finding does not prove that he was not. Probabilistic analysis of the GSR results provides more value to the court, so the present study calculated likelihood ratio (LR) values for finding 0-8 characteristic GSR particles (containing Lead, Barium and Antimony) on a suspect's hands, based on the available GSR data from the published literature as well as studies by the authors. Defense propositions, i.e. modes for GSR acquisition other than involvement in a shooting event, were divided into three broad categories: low, medium and heavy background. For each background level and number of GSR particles found, minimal and maximal LR values were calculated. Thus, for each proposition the defense provides for the presence of GSR on the defendant's hands, the forensic expert can provide a possible set of minimal and maximal LR values, leaving the court to examine the defendant's contention and decide which of the three background modes is more plausible according to the circumstances of the specific case.(c) 2022 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The likelihood-ratio framework and forensic evidence in court a response to R v T
    Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE & PROOF, 2012, 16 (01): : 1 - 29
  • [2] Evaluating the Variance of Likelihood-Ratio Gradient Estimators
    Tokui, Seiya
    Sato, Issei
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING, VOL 70, 2017, 70
  • [3] Measuring the validity and reliability of forensic likelihood-ratio systems
    Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart
    [J]. SCIENCE & JUSTICE, 2011, 51 (03) : 91 - 98
  • [4] Sampling variability in forensic likelihood-ratio computation: A simulation study
    Ali, Tauseef
    Spreeuwers, Luuk
    Veldhuis, Raymond
    Meuwly, Didier
    [J]. SCIENCE & JUSTICE, 2015, 55 (06) : 499 - 508
  • [5] SOME RESULTS ON DISTRIBUTION OF WILKSS LIKELIHOOD-RATIO CRITERION
    LEE, YS
    [J]. BIOMETRIKA, 1972, 59 (03) : 649 - 664
  • [6] Trends in analysis of gunshot residue for forensic purposes
    Brozek-Mucha, Zuzanna
    [J]. ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2017, 409 (25) : 5803 - 5811
  • [7] Trends in analysis of gunshot residue for forensic purposes
    Zuzanna Brożek-Mucha
    [J]. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2017, 409 : 5803 - 5811
  • [9] Estimating the Precision of the Likelihood-Ratio Output of a Forensic-Voice-Comparison System
    Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart
    Thiruvaran, Tharmarajah
    Epps, Julien
    [J]. ODYSSEY 2010: THE SPEAKER AND LANGUAGE RECOGNITION WORKSHOP, 2010, : 63 - 70
  • [10] Likelihood-ratio forensic voice comparison using parametric representations of the formant trajectories of diphthongs
    Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2009, 125 (04): : 2387 - 2397