Birthweight in infants conceived through in vitro fertilization following blastocyst or cleavage-stage embryo transfer: a national registry study

被引:9
|
作者
Litzky, Julia F. [1 ]
Boulet, Sheree L. [2 ]
Esfandiari, Navid [3 ,4 ]
Zhang, Yujia [2 ]
Kissin, Dmitry M. [2 ]
Theiler, Regan N. [5 ]
Marsit, Carmen J. [6 ]
机构
[1] Dartmouth Coll, Dept Epidemiol, Geisel Sch Med, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
[2] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Div Reprod Hlth, Natl Ctr Chron Dis Prevent & Hlth Promot, Atlanta, GA 30341 USA
[3] Dartmouth Coll, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Geisel Sch Med, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
[4] Dartmouth Coll, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Geisel Sch Med, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
[5] Mayo Clin, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[6] Emory Univ, Rollins Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Environm Hlth, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Birthweight; In vitro fertilization; Embryo transfer; Blastocyst; Cleavage-stage embryo; ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES; HUMAN SEX-RATIO; SINGLETON PREGNANCIES; INCREASED RISK; PRETERM BIRTH; PERINATAL OUTCOMES; CHILDREN BORN; CULTURE; ART; AUSTRALIA;
D O I
10.1007/s10815-018-1168-7
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
In vitro fertilization (IVF) infants have lower birthweights than their peers, predisposing them to long-term health consequences. Blastocyst transfer (BT), at day 5-6 post-fertilization, is increasing in usage, partially due to improved pregnancy outcomes over cleavage-stage transfer (CT, day 2-3). Data to date, however, have been inconclusive regarding BT's effects on birthweight. Participants included all US autologous, single-gestation, fresh embryo transfer cycles initiated from 2007 to 2014 that resulted in a term infant (N = 124,154) from the National Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance System. Generalized linear models including obstetric history, maternal demographics, and infant sex and gestational age were used to compare birthweight outcomes for infants born following BT (N = 67,169) with infants born following CT (N = 56,985) and to test for an interaction between transfer stage and single embryo transfer (SET). Infants born following BT were 6 g larger than those born following CT (p = 0.04), but rates of macrosomia (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.96-1.04) and low birthweight (LBW, RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.93-1.06) were not different between the groups. The interaction between SET and transfer stage was significant (p = 0.02). Among SET infants, BT was associated with 19.26 g increased birthweight compared to CT (p = 0.008). The increase in birthweights identified following BT is unlikely to be clinically relevant, as there were no differences in rates of macrosomia or LBW. These findings are clinically reassuring and indicate that the increasing use of BT is unlikely to further decrease the on average lower birthweights seen in IVF infants compared to their naturally conceived peers.
引用
收藏
页码:1027 / 1037
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Birthweight in infants conceived through in vitro fertilization following blastocyst or cleavage-stage embryo transfer: a national registry study
    Julia F. Litzky
    Sheree L. Boulet
    Navid Esfandiari
    Yujia Zhang
    Dmitry M. Kissin
    Regan N. Theiler
    Carmen J. Marsit
    [J]. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2018, 35 : 1027 - 1037
  • [2] Blastocyst or cleavage-stage embryo transfer?
    Johnson, Neil
    Blake, Debbie
    Farquhar, Cindy
    [J]. BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2007, 21 (01) : 21 - 40
  • [3] Cumulative Pregnancy Rates Following Cleavage-stage and Blastocyst Embryo Transfer
    Kwik, Michele
    Lam, Lawrence
    Chapman, Michael
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2010, 50 : 5 - 5
  • [4] BIRTHWEIGHT IN INFANTS FOLLOWING BLASTOCYST TRANSFER COMPARED TO CLEAVAGE STAGE TRANSFER.
    Litzky, J. F.
    Boulet, S.
    Esfandiari, N.
    Zhang, Y.
    Kissin, D. M.
    Theiler, R. N.
    Marsit, C.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2017, 108 (03) : E37 - E37
  • [5] Cumulative pregnancy rates following cleavage-stage or blastocyst embryo transfer - a large case controlled study
    Kwik, M.
    Chapman, M.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2011, 26 : I190 - I190
  • [6] BLASTOCYST VERSUS CLEAVAGE-STAGE ELECTIVE SINGLE EMBRYO TRANSFER - A COMPARATIVE RETROSPECTIVE STUDY
    Veleva, Z.
    Boulet, S.
    Makinen, S.
    Martikainen, H.
    Tiitinen, A.
    Tapanainen, J.
    Kissin, D. M.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2015, 104 (03) : E181 - E182
  • [7] Cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology
    Glujovsky, Demian
    Quinteiro Retamar, Andrea Marta
    Alvarez Sedo, Cristian Roberto
    Ciapponi, Agustin
    Cornelisse, Simone
    Blake, Deborah
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2022, (05):
  • [8] Birthweight of singletons born after cleavage-stage or blastocyst transfer in fresh and warming cycles
    De Vos, Anick
    Santos-Ribeiro, Samuel
    Van Landuyt, Lisbet
    Van de Velde, Hilde
    Tournaye, Herman
    Verheyen, Greta
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2018, 33 (02) : 196 - 201
  • [9] In vitro fertilization with single blastocyst-stage versus single cleavage-stage embryos.
    Papanikolaou, EG
    Camus, M
    Kolibianakis, EM
    Van Landuyt, L
    Van Steirteghem, A
    Devroey, P
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 354 (11): : 1139 - 1146
  • [10] Influence of cleavage-stage embryo quality on the in-vitro fertilization outcome after single embryo transfer in fresh cycles
    Sun, Yu
    Li, Enshu
    Feng, Guofang
    Li, Miao
    Fu, Yanling
    You, Jiali
    Liu, Xiaozhen
    Zhu, Yimin
    [J]. TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 59 (06): : 872 - 876