Implementation of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and comparison with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in the postoperative treatment of cervical cancer

被引:7
|
作者
Marjanovic, Dragoslava [1 ]
Plesinac-Karapandzic, Vesna [1 ,2 ]
Rundic, Suzana Stojanovic [1 ,2 ]
Tomasevic, Aleksandar [1 ,2 ]
Saric, Milan [3 ]
Miskovic, Ivana [3 ]
Nidzovic, Borko [3 ]
Mikovic, Mirjana [1 ]
Petrasinovic, Predrag [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Oncol & Radiol Serbia, Dept Radiotherapy, Belgrade, Serbia
[2] Univ Sch Med, Belgrade, Serbia
[3] Inst Oncol & Radiol Serbia, Dept Radiat Phys, Belgrade, Serbia
来源
JOURNAL OF BUON | 2019年 / 24卷 / 05期
关键词
cervical cancer; dosimetric parameters; intensity-modulated radiotherapy; three-dimensional radiotherapy; ACUTE HEMATOLOGIC TOXICITY; WHOLE PELVIC RADIOTHERAPY; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; RADIATION; PREDICTORS; STAGE; ENDOMETRIAL; PARAMETERS; IMPACT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Within implementation of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in the postoperative irradiation of cervical cancer we evaluated and compared IMRT and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) dosimetric parameters for target volumes and organs at risk (OAR). Methods: We randomized 95 patients with cervical cancer, UICC stage I-III, in groups depending of the type of external beam postoperative radiotherapy. Forty-five patients were treated with IMRT and 50 with 3DCRT. All patients underwent brachytherapy, and according to risk factors some of the patients had concomitant cisplatin chemotherapy. The study was done in a period of three years from December 2015. Analysis of dosimetric parameters for target volume coverage and OARs was performed. Results: IMRT plans showed better conformity compared to 3DCRT plans, represented with homogenity index and conformity index, with higher maximum dose (PTV105 and D-2). Both plans achieved adequate planning target volume coverage described with PTV95. Statistically significant difference between groups was found for bladder, rectum and bowel high dose regions: bladder V45 (p=0.000), rectum V40 (p=0.043) and V45 (p=0.000), bowel V45 (p=0.000), and bone marrow dosimetric parameters V20-V45; all were better in IMRT plans. Significant difference was found for volume of patient body normal tissue receiving dose of 20Gy, which was higher in IMRT. Conclusion: IMRT is a highly conformal technique. Satisfactory target volume coverage was achieved with both techniques, with better sparing of OARs in the IMRT group. With this technique improvement, we expect better quality of life in cervical cancer patients with good prognosis.
引用
收藏
页码:2028 / 2034
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Retrospective analysis of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy of postoperative treatment for biliary tract cancer
    Lee, Hyo Chun
    Lee, Jong Hoon
    Lee, Sea-Won
    Lee, Joo Hwan
    Yu, Mina
    Jang, Hong Seok
    Kim, Sung Hwan
    [J]. RADIATION ONCOLOGY JOURNAL, 2019, 37 (04): : 279 - 285
  • [2] A comparative analysis of quality of life after postoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy or three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for cervical cancer
    Mohanty, Sarthak Kumar
    Chopra, Supriya
    Mudaliar, Anisha
    Kannan, Sadhana
    Mahantshetty, Umesh
    Engineer, Reena
    Ghosh, Jaya
    Bajpai, Jyoti
    Gupta, Sudeep
    Shrivastava, Shyamkishore
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2018, 55 (04) : 327 - 335
  • [3] Intensity-modulated three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy
    Mohan, R
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 39 (02): : 121 - 121
  • [4] A comparison of clinical outcomes between three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer
    Takuya Shimizuguchi
    Keiji Nihei
    Tomoyuki Okano
    Yumiko Machitori
    Kei Ito
    Katsuyuki Karasawa
    [J]. International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2017, 22 : 373 - 379
  • [5] A Comparison of Gastrointestinal Toxicities between Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy for Pancreatic Cancer
    Lee, Kyong Joo
    Yoon, Hong In
    Chung, Moon Jae
    Park, Jeong Youp
    Bang, Seungmin
    Park, Seung-woo
    Seong, Jin Sil
    Song, Si Young
    [J]. GUT AND LIVER, 2016, 10 (02) : 303 - 309
  • [6] A comparison of clinical outcomes between three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer
    Shimizuguchi, Takuya
    Nihei, Keiji
    Okano, Tomoyuki
    Machitori, Yumiko
    Ito, Kei
    Karasawa, Katsuyuki
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 22 (02) : 373 - 379
  • [7] DOSIMETRIC COMPARISON OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL CONFORMAL PROTON RADIOTHERAPY, INTENSITY-MODULATED PROTON THERAPY, AND INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY FOR TREATMENT OF PEDIATRIC CRANIOPHARYNGIOMAS
    Boehling, Nicholas S.
    Grosshans, David R.
    Bluett, Jaques B.
    Palmer, Matthew T.
    Song, Xiaofei
    Amos, Richard A.
    Sahoo, Narayan
    Meyer, Jeffrey J.
    Mahajan, Anita
    Woo, Shiao Y.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 82 (02): : 643 - 652
  • [8] Dosimetric comparison of postoperative whole pelvic radiotherapy for endometrial cancer using three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, and helical tomotherapy
    Yang, Ruijie
    Xu, Shouping
    Jiang, Weijuan
    Wang, Junjie
    Xie, Chuanbin
    [J]. ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2010, 49 (02) : 230 - 236
  • [9] Dosimetric Comparison of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy, Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy and Hybrid Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy/Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Techniques for Right Breast Cancer
    Liu, Yi-Chi
    Chang, Hung-Ming
    Lin, Hsin-Hon
    Lu, Chia-Chun
    Lai, Lu-Han
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (12) : 1 - 14
  • [10] VOLUMETRIC MODULATED ARC THERAPY FOR DELIVERY OF PROSTATE RADIOTHERAPY: COMPARISON WITH INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY AND THREE-DIMENSIONAL CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY
    Palma, David
    Vollans, Emily
    James, Kerry
    Nakano, Sandy
    Moiseenko, Vitali
    Shaffer, Richard
    Mckenzie, Michael
    Morris, James
    Otto, Karl
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 72 (04): : 996 - 1001