Long-Term Efficacy of Constant Current Deep Brain Stimulation in Essential Tremor

被引:13
|
作者
Haddad, Ali Rezaei [1 ,2 ]
Samuel, Michael [3 ]
Hulse, Natasha [1 ]
Lin, Hsin-Ying [1 ,4 ]
Ashkan, Keyoumars [1 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll Hosp London, Dept Neurosurg, London, England
[2] Univ Warwick, Warwick Med Sch, Coventry, W Midlands, England
[3] Kings Coll Hosp London, Kings Hlth Partners, Natl Parkinson Fdn Int Ctr Excellence, Dept Neurol, London, England
[4] Taipei Med Univ, Dept Neurosurg, Wan Fang Med Ctr, Taipei, Taiwan
来源
NEUROMODULATION | 2017年 / 20卷 / 05期
关键词
Constant current stimulation; essential tremor; INTERMEDIATE THALAMIC NUCLEUS; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PARKINSONS-DISEASE; MOVEMENT-DISORDERS; FOLLOW-UP; ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION; CEREBELLUM; IMPEDANCE;
D O I
10.1111/ner.12592
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
ObjectivesVentralis intermedius deep brain stimulation is an established intervention for medication-refractory essential tremor. Newer constant current stimulation technology offers theoretical advantage over the traditional constant voltage systems in terms of delivering a more biologically stable therapy. There are no previous reports on the outcomes of constant current deep brain stimulation in the treatment of essential tremor. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy of ventralis intermedius constant current deep brain stimulation in patients diagnosed with essential tremor. Materials and MethodsEssential tremor patients implanted with constant current deep brain stimulation for a minimum of three years were evaluated. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin tremor rating scale at baseline and postoperatively at the time of evaluation. The quality of life in the patients was assessed using the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor questionnaire. ResultsTen patients were evaluated with a median age at evaluation of 74 years (range 66-79) and a mean follow up time of 49.7 (range 36-78) months since starting stimulation. Constant current ventralis intermedius deep brain stimulation was well tolerated and effective in all patients with a mean score improvement from 50.75.9 to 17.4 +/- 5.7 (p=0.0020) in the total Fahn-Tolosa-Marin rating scale score (65.6%). Furthermore, the total combined mean Quality of Life in Essential Tremor score was improved from 56.2 +/- 4.9 to 16.8 +/- 3.5 (p value=0.0059) (70.1%). ConclusionThis report shows that long-term constant current ventralis intermedius deep brain stimulation is a safe and effective intervention for essential tremor patients.
引用
收藏
页码:437 / 443
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The long-term safety and efficacy of thalamic deep brain stimulation in essential tremor
    Baizabal-Carvallo, J. F.
    Kagnoff, M.
    Jimenez-Shahed, J.
    Fekete, R.
    Jankovic, J.
    [J]. MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2013, 28 : S430 - S430
  • [2] Long-term safety and efficacy of unilateral deep brain stimulation of the thalamus in essential tremor
    Koller, WC
    Lyons, KE
    Wilkinson, SB
    Troster, AI
    Pahwa, R
    [J]. MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2001, 16 (03) : 464 - 468
  • [3] Factors involved in long-term efficacy of deep brain stimulation of the thalamus for essential tremor
    Pilitsis, Julie G.
    Metman, Leo Verhagen
    Toleikis, John R.
    Hughes, Lindsay E.
    Sani, Sepehr B.
    Bakay, Roy A. E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2008, 109 (04) : 640 - 646
  • [4] Long-term results of thalamic deep brain stimulation for essential tremor
    Zhang, Kai
    Bhatia, Sanjay
    Oh, Michael Y.
    Cohen, Davin
    Angle, Cindy
    Whiting, Donald
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2010, 112 (06) : 1271 - 1276
  • [5] Long-term efficacy of deep brain stimulation for essential tremor An observer-blinded study
    Paschen, Steffen
    Forstenpointner, Julia
    Becktepe, Jos
    Heinzel, Sebastian
    Hellriegel, Helge
    Witt, Karsten
    Helmers, Ann-Kristin
    Deuschl, Guenther
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 2019, 92 (12) : E1378 - E1386
  • [6] Long-term effects of unilateral deep brain stimulation on voice tremor in patients with essential tremor
    Sandstrom, Linda
    Blomstedt, Patric
    Karlsson, Fredrik
    [J]. PARKINSONISM & RELATED DISORDERS, 2019, 60 : 70 - 75
  • [7] Long-term Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for Essential Tremor: Clinical Outcome and Stimulation Parameters
    Rodriguez Cruz, Pedro M.
    Vargas, Antonio
    Fernandez-Carballal, Carlos
    Garbizu, Jose
    De La Casa-Fages, Beatriz
    Grandas, Francisco
    [J]. MOVEMENT DISORDERS CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2016, 3 (06): : 567 - 572
  • [8] Thalamic deep brain stimulation for essential tremor: Recommendations for long-term outcome analysis
    Putzke, JD
    Wharen, RE
    Obwegeser, AA
    Wszolek, ZK
    Lucas, JA
    Turk, MF
    Uitti, RJ
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2004, 31 (03) : 333 - 342
  • [9] Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for essential tremor - A long-term follow-up
    Blomstedt, P.
    Hariz, G.
    Hariz, M. I.
    [J]. MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2006, 21 : S690 - S690
  • [10] Long-term follow-up of thalamic deep brain stimulation for essential tremor
    Cohen, D. B.
    Oh, M. Y.
    Angle, C.
    Baser, S. M.
    Whiting, D. M.
    [J]. STEREOTACTIC AND FUNCTIONAL NEUROSURGERY, 2007, 85 (01) : 32 - 32