Single-Institution Retrospective Analysis of Ovarian Cancer Outcomes from the Middle Eastern Republic of Georgia

被引:0
|
作者
Vardiashvili, Nino [1 ]
McKenzie, Nathalie D. [2 ]
Ahmad, Sarfraz [2 ]
Todua, Irakli [1 ]
Qoiava, Levan [1 ]
Giorgadze, Tamar [1 ]
Matcharashvili, Mariam [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Ctr Innova, St 6,0179, GE-1009 Tbilisi, Georgia
[2] AdventHlth Canc Inst, Gynecol Oncol Program, Orlando, FL 32804 USA
关键词
Ovarian cancer; Neoadjuvant treatment; Primary debulking surgery; Centralized cancer care; Low-to-middle-income country; SCORPION trail; Comparative analysis; Survival; PRIMARY SURGERY; CHEMOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1007/s40944-022-00618-z
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Purpose Ovarian cancer (OC) diagnosis and management is challenging in any country; however, in Middle Eastern Republic of Georgia (MEROG), limited resources pose additional challenges. Our surgical goal mirrors international goals of cytoreduction to no gross residual disease (R0). We used international SCORPION trial results as a benchmark for historical contextual comparison. Methods Single institutional retrospective data were collected at Medical Center Innova (MCI), Tbilisi, Georgia. All consecutive stages I-IV OC patients (n = 107) received care by single medical oncologist and single surgical group during 2016-2020. Two treatment strategies were employed: Group A [n = 29, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT)] received neoadjuvant three cycles of chemotherapy with paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) and carboplatin AUC 5-6 IV day 1, followed by interval cytoreductive surgery and three additional cycles of chemotherapy. Group B cases [n = 78, primary debulking surgery (PDS)] received upfront surgery and six cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy same scheme. Results Of the 107 OC cases treated, 95 (88%) patients were diagnosed at late stage. Mean age in our cohort was similar (57 year; range 22-80) as compared to SCORPION cohort. Most cases (92%) were high-grade serous OC. Twenty-nine cases (27%) received NACT, and R0 resection rate in this group was 86%. Seventy-eight women (72%) had upfront surgery with an R0 rate of 82%. Conclusions The R0 rates in our MEROG are comparable to/better than SCORPION trail results for the treatment strategies [upfront surgery group (82 vs.47%) and neoadjuvant group (86 vs.77%)]. The outcomes of patients with advanced-stage OC treated in low-resource/middle-income country (Georgia) are comparable to the broader European experience.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Single-Institution Retrospective Analysis of Ovarian Cancer Outcomes from the Middle Eastern Republic of Georgia
    Nino Vardiashvili
    Nathalie D. McKenzie
    Sarfraz Ahmad
    Irakli Todua
    Levan Qoiava
    Tamar Giorgadze
    Mariam Matcharashvili
    Indian Journal of Gynecologic Oncology, 2022, 20
  • [2] Patterns of Treatment and Outcomes in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Retrospective North Indian Single-Institution Experience
    Meena, Rajendra Kumar
    Syed, Nisar Ahmad
    Sheikh, Zahoor Ahmad
    Guru, Faisal Rashid
    Mir, Mohmad Hussain
    Banday, Saquib Zaffar
    Krishnan, Arun
    Parveen, Shaheena
    Dar, Nazir Ahmad
    Bhat, Gull Mohammad
    JCO GLOBAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 8 : e2200032
  • [3] Cutaneous Metastasis from Lung Cancer: A Single-Institution Retrospective Analysis
    Lee, Jong Hwan
    Ahn, Se Jin
    Kim, Hyung Jin
    Jang, Sang Eon
    Noh, Geum Youb
    Kim, Hye-Ryoun
    Kim, Cheol Hyeon
    Lee, Jae Cheol
    TUBERCULOSIS AND RESPIRATORY DISEASES, 2011, 70 (02) : 139 - 142
  • [4] Correlation of Tumor Location to Clinical Outcomes in Colorectal Cancer: A Single-institution Retrospective Analysis
    Signorelli, Carlo
    Chilelli, Mario Giovanni
    Sperduti, Isabella
    Giacinti, Silvana
    Amodio, Pietro Maria
    Palmieri, Raffaele Macarone
    Ranalli, Teresa Valentina
    Gomes, Vito Vincenzo
    Rosetto, Maria Elena
    Nelli, Fabrizio
    Ruggeri, Enzo Maria
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 39 (09) : 4917 - 4924
  • [5] Outcomes of Patients with Metastatic Melanoma-A Single-Institution Retrospective Analysis
    Szatkowska, Lidia
    Sieczek, Jan
    Tekiela, Katarzyna
    Zietek, Marcin
    Stachyra-Strawa, Paulina
    Cisek, Pawel
    Matkowski, Rafal
    CANCERS, 2022, 14 (07)
  • [6] Outcomes in patients with pancreatic cancer as a secondary malignancy: a retrospective single-institution study
    Sojun Hoshimoto
    Shoichi Hishinuma
    Hirofumi Shirakawa
    Moriaki Tomikawa
    Iwao Ozawa
    Yoshiro Ogata
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 2019, 404 : 975 - 983
  • [7] Outcomes in patients with pancreatic cancer as a secondary malignancy: a retrospective single-institution study
    Hoshimoto, Sojun
    Hishinuma, Shoichi
    Shirakawa, Hirofumi
    Tomikawa, Moriaki
    Ozawa, Iwao
    Ogata, Yoshiro
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2019, 404 (08) : 975 - 983
  • [8] Triple-negative breast cancer: A single-institution retrospective analysis
    Julka, P. K.
    Mallick, S.
    Pandit, S.
    Joshi, N. P.
    Gandhi, A.
    Kunhiparambath, H.
    Sharma, D.
    Rath, G. K.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (15)
  • [9] CAPECITABINE IN THE TREATMENT OF METASTATIC BREAST CANCER: SINGLE-INSTITUTION RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS
    Gaballah, Ahmed
    Refaat, Ghada
    Abdelwahab, Sherif
    Yousri, Sarah
    BREAST, 2017, 36 : S59 - S59
  • [10] Triple-negative breast cancer: A single-institution retrospective analysis
    Mallick, S.
    Gandhi, A. K.
    Melgandi, W.
    Joshi, N. P.
    Sharma, D. N.
    Haresh, K. P.
    Julka, P. K.
    Gupta, S.
    Rath, G. K.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 49 : S429 - S429