A Prospective Study on the Efficacy of Cognitive Targeted Transrectal Ultrasound Prostate Biopsy in Diagnosing Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer

被引:1
|
作者
Thangarasu, Mathisekaran [1 ]
Jayaprakash, Sanjay Prakash [1 ]
Selvaraj, Nivash [1 ]
Bafna, Sandeep [1 ]
Paul, Rajesh [1 ]
Mahesh, Chandranathan [1 ]
Jain, Nitesh [1 ]
Balakrishnan, Arunkumar [1 ]
Sivaraman, Ananthakrishnan [1 ]
机构
[1] Apollo Main Hosp, Dept Urol, 21 Greams Lane,Off Greams Rd, Chennai 600006, Tamil Nadu, India
来源
关键词
mpMRI target biopsy; prostate cancer; standard systematic biopsy; cognitive targeted biopsy; FUSION; MRI; EPIDEMIOLOGY; GUIDANCE;
D O I
10.2147/RRU.S300868
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We present our study, done to identify the diagnostic yield of cognitive targeted biopsy using mpMRI data, to diagnose clinically significant prostate cancers, in a cohort of biopsy and treatment naive men. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective, single institutional study, done from September 2018 to March 2020 in 75 biopsy naive men. The patients with 3, 4 and 5 PIRADS scores underwent mpMRI cognitive target biopsy (mpMRI CTB) followed by standard biopsy (SB) in the same setting by two different urologists. Diagnostic yield of biopsy cores, complications, and stage migration of Gleason's grades was analyzed. Results: Out of 75 patients, 34.6% had abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE), and the median serum PSA was 10.6 (4.5-20) ng/mL. Total MRI suspicious lesions were 163. Out of 1263 SB cores, 371 cores were positive for cancer (29.35%), and out of 326 mpMRI CTB cores, 120 were positive for cancer (36.8%) (P<0.0001). Histopathological examination (HPE) revealed 88%, 92%, and 100% clinically significant cancers in PIRADS 3, 4 and 5 lesions. SB and mpMRI CTB in combination have better cancer detection yield than either of the modality when used alone (P-<0.0001). Clavien-Dindo grade 1 and grade 4a complication were seen in 47 (62.6%) and three (4%) patients. Conclusion: In biopsy-naive men with suspected prostate cancer and equivocal DRE, the addition of pre-biopsy mpMRI detects greater numbers of people with clinically significant prostate cancer when compared with SB alone. Combining SB with mpMRI CTB has a superior diagnosing ability when compared with either of the biopsy modalities when used alone.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 213
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Prospective Study on the Efficacy of Cognitive Targeted Transrectal Ultrasound Prostate Biopsy in Diagnosing Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer (vol 13, pg 207, 2021)
    Thangarasu, M.
    Jayaprakash, S. P.
    Selvaraj, N.
    Magesh, Chandranathan
    [J]. RESEARCH AND REPORTS IN UROLOGY, 2021, 13 : 295 - 295
  • [2] Diagnostic performance of targeted transrectal MRI-Ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer
    Yuwono, A.
    Tan, T. -W.
    Yeow, Y.
    Lee, C. -H.
    Tan, C. -H.
    Chong, K. -T.
    Lee, Y. -M.
    Png, K. -S.
    Tan, Y. -K.
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 119 : 19 - 19
  • [3] The Efficacy of Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Biopsy Versus Transperineal Template Biopsy of the Prostate in Diagnosing Prostate Cancer in Men with Previous Negative Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Biopsy
    Nafie, Shady
    Wanis, Michael
    Khan, Masood
    [J]. UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2017, 14 (02) : 3008 - 3012
  • [4] Utility of MRI fusion-targeted transrectal prostate biopsy and prostate health index in detection of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Leow, J.
    Yeow, Y.
    Tan, T.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 26 : 84 - 85
  • [5] Utility of MRI fusion-targeted transrectal prostate biopsy and prostate health index detection of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Yeow, Y.
    Leow, J.
    Tan, T. W.
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 123 : 31 - 31
  • [6] Cognitive Targeted Prostate Biopsy Alone for Diagnosing Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Selected Biopsy-Naïve Patients: Results from a Retrospective Pilot Study
    Olivetta, Michelangelo
    Manfredi, Celeste
    Spirito, Lorenzo
    Quattrone, Carmelo
    Bottone, Francesco
    Stizzo, Marco
    Amicuzi, Ugo
    Lecce, Arturo
    Rubinacci, Andrea
    Romano, Lorenzo
    Della Rosa, Giampiero
    Papi, Salvatore
    Tammaro, Simone
    Coppola, Paola
    Arcaniolo, Davide
    Fusco, Ferdinando
    De Sio, Marco
    [J]. DIAGNOSTICS, 2024, 14 (15)
  • [7] Detecting Prostate Cancer A Prospective Comparison of Systematic Prostate Biopsy With Targeted Biopsy Guided by Fused MRI and Transrectal Ultrasound
    Brock, Marko
    von Bodman, Christian
    Palisaar, Jueri
    Becker, Wolfgang
    Martin-Seidel, Philipp
    Noldus, Joachim
    [J]. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 112 (37): : 605 - U13
  • [8] Improving Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy
    Rastinehad, Ardeshir R.
    Turkbey, Baris
    Salami, Simpa S.
    Yaskiv, Oksana
    George, Arvin K.
    Fakhoury, Mathew
    Beecher, Karin
    Vira, Manish A.
    Kavoussi, Louis R.
    Siegel, David N.
    Villani, Robert
    Ben-Levi, Eran
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (06): : 1749 - 1754
  • [9] Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection Following Transrectal and Transperineal Biopsy: Results of the Prostate Biopsy Efficacy and Complications Randomized Clinical Trial
    Mian, Badar M.
    Feustel, Paul J.
    Aziz, Asef
    Kaufman Jr, Ronald P.
    Bernstein, Adrien
    Fisher, Hugh A. G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 212 (01): : 21 - 31
  • [10] Can transrectal prostate ultrasound compete with multiparametric MRI in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer?
    Grey, Alistair D. R.
    Connor, Martin J.
    Tam, Joseph
    Loch, Tillmann
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2020, 9 (03) : 1492 - 1500