Individual differences of action orientation for risk taking in sports

被引:31
|
作者
Raab, M [1 ]
Johnson, JG [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Quantitat Div, Chicago, IL 60680 USA
关键词
basketball; decision field theory; decision making; modeling;
D O I
10.1080/02701367.2004.10609164
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The goal of this article is to explain empirical risk-taking behavior in sports from an individual cognitive modeling perspective. A basketball task was used in which Participants viewed four video options that varied in the degree of associated risk. The participants were independently classified by scores on the Questionnaire for Assessing Prospective Action Orientation and State Orientation in Success, Failure, and Planning Situations as action-oriented or state-oriented decision makers. The results of the experiment show that action-oriented players shoot faster and more often to the basket and that state-oriented Players Prefer to pass to a playmaker more often. Four versions of a computational model of decision making, Decision Field Theory, were compared to evaluate whether behavioral differences depend on the focus of attention, the initial preferences, threshold values, or an approach-avoidance interpretation of the task. Different starting preferences explained individual choices and decision times most accurately. Risk taking in basketball shooting behavior can be best explained by different preferences for starting values for risky and safe options caused by different levels of action orientation.
引用
收藏
页码:326 / 336
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Safety first: Differences in action orientation impact performance and risk-taking in soccer
    Froese, Georg
    Kuhl, Julius
    JOURNAL OF SPORT & EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 32 : S25 - S26
  • [2] INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN RISK-TAKING
    STREUFERT, S
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 16 (06) : 482 - 497
  • [3] Individual differences and risk taking in rock climbing
    Llewellyn, David J.
    Sanchez, Xavier
    PSYCHOLOGY OF SPORT AND EXERCISE, 2008, 9 (04) : 413 - 426
  • [4] Individual differences in sexual risk taking - Discussion
    Gerrard, M
    ROLE OF THEORY IN SEX RESEARCH, 2000, 6 : 221 - 223
  • [5] Individual differences in sexual risk taking - Discussion
    Laumann, E
    Bem, D
    Bancroft, J
    Ehrhardt, A
    Tiefer, L
    Parker, R
    Gagnon, J
    Diaz, R
    Nathanson, C
    Dowsett, G
    Lindenbaum, S
    Herdt, G
    ROLE OF THEORY IN SEX RESEARCH, 2000, 6 : 224 - 237
  • [6] Individual differences in sexual risk taking - Discussion
    Paul, JP
    ROLE OF THEORY IN SEX RESEARCH, 2000, 6 : 213 - 220
  • [7] Taking action to lose weight: Towards an understanding of individual differences
    Annunziato, R
    Lowe, M
    OBESITY RESEARCH, 2004, 12 : A82 - A82
  • [8] INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN RISK-TAKING TENDENCY AND FRAMING EFFECT
    Gang Huangfu
    SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, 2014, 42 (02): : 279 - 284
  • [9] Developmental changes and individual differences in risk and perspective taking in adolescence
    Crone, Eveline A.
    Bullens, L.
    Van Der Plas, E. A. A.
    Kijkuit, E. J.
    Zelazo, P. D.
    DEVELOPMENT AND PSYCHOPATHOLOGY, 2008, 20 (04) : 1213 - 1229
  • [10] Individual differences in sexual risk taking: A biopsychosocial theoretical approach
    Bancroft, J
    Ehrhardt, A
    O'Sullivan, L
    Michael, B
    Gagnon, J
    Fortenberry, D
    Plummer, K
    ROLE OF THEORY IN SEX RESEARCH, 2000, 6 : 177 - 212