Comparison of renal function after open radical cystectomy, extracorporeal robot assisted radical cystectomy, and intracorporeal robot assisted radical cystectomy

被引:14
|
作者
Lone, Zaeem [1 ]
Murthy, Prithvi B. [2 ]
Zhang, J. J. Haijing [2 ]
Ericson, Kyle J. [2 ]
Thomas, Lewis [2 ]
Khanna, Abhinav [2 ]
Haber, Georges-Pascal [2 ]
Lee, Byron H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Lerner Coll Med, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin, Dept Urol, Glickman Urol & Kidney Inst, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
Radical cystectomy; Bladder cancer; Renal function; Chronic kidney disease; Minimally invasive surgery; CHRONIC KIDNEY-DISEASE; URINARY-DIVERSION; FUNCTION OUTCOMES; ILEAL CONDUIT; CANCER;
D O I
10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.09.018
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Renal function outcomes following robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) have not been well established. We sought to compare long-term renal function outcomes between open radical cystectomy, RARC with extracorporeal urinary diversion and intracorporeal urinary diversion at a high volume institution. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed our institutional bladder cancer database for patients who underwent RC from 2010 to 2019 with pre-operative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) > 45 ml/min/1.73m(2). Changes in renal function were assessed through locally weighted scatter plot smoothing and comparison of median eGFR between surgical groups. Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3B was defined as eGFR < 45 ml/min/1.73m(2). Renal function decline was defined as a >= 10 ml/min/1.73m(2) drop in eGFR. Kaplan Meier method with log-rank was used to compare CKD 3B-free survival and renal function decline. Cox Proportional Hazards model was used to identify predictors of CKD 3B. Results: Six hundred and forty four patients were included with median follow-up of 32 months (IQR 12-56). Preoperative characteristics were similar among the groups with no differences in median pre-operative eGFR (ORC: 74.6, extracorporeal urinary diversion: 74.3, intracorporeal urinary diversion: 71.6 ml/min/1.73m(2), P = 0.15). Median postoperative eGFR on follow up was not different between groups (P = 0.56). 33% of patients developed CKD 3B. There were no differences in CKD 3B-free survival by surgical approach (P = 0.23) or urinary diversion (P = 0.09). 64% of patients experienced renal function decline with a median time of 2.4 years (P 0.23). Predictors of CKD were pathologic T3 disease or greater (HR: 1.77, P = 0.01), ureteroenteric anastomotic stricture (HR: 2.80, P < 0.001), preoperative CKD Stage 2 (HR: 1.81, P=0.02), and preoperative CKD Stage 3A (HR: 5.56, P < 0.001). Conclusion: Renal function decline is common after RC. Tumor stage, pre-operative eGFR, and ureteral stricture development, not surgical approach, influence renal function decline. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:301.e1 / 301.e9
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Re: Comparison of renal function after open radical cystectomy, extracorporeal robot assisted radical cystectomy, and intracorporeal robot assisted radical cystectomy
    Ghoreifi, Alireza
    Djaladat, Hooman
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2021, 39 (05) : 304 - 305
  • [2] COMPARISON OF OPEN AND ROBOT ASSISTED RADICAL CYSTECTOMY
    Nunez, Rafael N.
    Andrews, Paul E.
    Martin, Aaron D.
    Ferrigni, Robert G.
    Swanson, Scott K.
    Humphreys, Mitchell R.
    Castle, Erik P.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (04): : 360 - 361
  • [3] Robot assisted radical cystectomy
    Hemal, Ashok K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 17 : A12 - A14
  • [4] Cost Analysis of Open Radical Cystectomy Versus Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy
    Mmeje, Chinedu O.
    Martin, Aaron D.
    Nunez-Nateras, Rafael
    Parker, Alexander S.
    Thiel, David D.
    Castle, Erik P.
    CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2013, 14 (01) : 26 - 31
  • [5] Large Single Institution Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes and Complications of Open Radical Cystectomy, Intracorporeal Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy and Robotic Extracorporeal Approach
    Goh, Alvin C.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 (03): : 520 - 521
  • [6] Cost Analysis of Open Radical Cystectomy Versus Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy
    Chinedu O. Mmeje
    Aaron D. Martin
    Rafael Nunez-Nateras
    Alexander S. Parker
    David D. Thiel
    Erik P. Castle
    Current Urology Reports, 2013, 14 : 26 - 31
  • [7] Cost analysis of open radical cystectomy versus robot-assisted radical cystectomy
    Bansal, Sukhchain S.
    Dogra, Tara
    Smith, Peter W.
    Amran, Maisarah
    Auluck, Ishna
    Bhambra, Maninder
    Sura, Manraj S.
    Rowe, Edward
    Koupparis, Anthony
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 121 (03) : 437 - 444
  • [8] Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy vs. open radical cystectomy
    Nouhaud, F. -X.
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2015, 25 (02): : F51 - F52
  • [9] Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy: Extracorporeal vs Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion
    Chan, Kevin G.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (05): : 1467 - 1468
  • [10] Comparison of perioperative outcomes in robot-assisted radical cystectomy and laparoscopic radical cystectomy
    Zhang, Shiwei
    Lin, Tingsheng
    Zhang, Qing
    Zhang, Shengjie
    Liu, Guangxiang
    Ji, Changwei
    Guo, Hongqian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2020, 16 (02):