The second-look operation improves survival in suboptimally debulked stage III ovarian cancer patients

被引:16
|
作者
Rahaman, J. [1 ]
Dottino, P. [1 ]
Jennings, T. S. [1 ]
Holland, J. [1 ]
Cohen, C. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Med Ctr, Div Gynecol Oncol, New York, NY 10029 USA
关键词
ovarian cancer survival; second-look surgery; suboptimal cytoreduction;
D O I
10.1111/j.1048-891X.2005.15003.x
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
In a single-institution retrospective cohort study, 230 patients were treated for stage III primary ovarian cancer and 175 became eligible for second-look operations by virtue of a complete clinical response after primary surgical cytoreduction and platinum-based combination chemotherapy. Of these, 109 underwent a second-look operation. Optimal primary cytoreduction was defined as residual disease:51 cm. Median follow-up was 68.3 months. Five-year survival for all the 230 stage III ovarian cancers was 43.4%. Among all eligible. patients (n = 175), there was no survival difference (P = 0.67) in those having second look (57.3%, 5-year survival) versus no second look (48.7%). In those patients with optimal primary cytoreduction (n = 118), there was no survival advantage to second look (69% versus 61%, P = 0.7). However, in those with suboptimal primary cytoreduction (n = 47), 5-year survival was 36% in those having second look versus only 13% in those refusing second look (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis identified second-look surgery as the only significant independent prognostic variable affecting survival (RR = 0.321, P < 0.04). Patients with suboptimal debulking at primary surgery for stage III ovarian cancer appear to achieve a survival benefit from second-look surgical procedures, presumably from the early identification and treatment of residual disease.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 25
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Second-look operation improves survival in suboptimal, debulked, stage III ovarian cancer
    Escobar, PF
    Michener, CM
    Rose, PG
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2005, 15 (06) : 1258 - 1258
  • [2] Second-look operation improves survival in suboptimal, debulked, stage III ovarian cancer - Response
    Rahaman, J
    Holland, J
    Cohen, CJ
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2005, 15 (06) : 1259 - 1259
  • [3] A gene signature predicting for survival in suboptimally debulked patients with ovarian cancer
    Bonome, Tomas
    Levine, Douglas A.
    Shih, Joanna
    Randonovich, Mike
    Pise-Masison, Cindy A.
    Bogomolniy, Faina
    Ozbun, Laurent
    Brady, John
    Barrett, J. Carl
    Boyd, Jeff
    Birrer, Michael J.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2008, 68 (13) : 5478 - 5486
  • [4] Second-look operation for ovarian cancer. Indication and limitation, impact on survival
    Ushijima, K
    Ohkura, N
    Komai, K
    Sugiyama, T
    Nishida, T
    Yakushiji, M
    XXX WORLD CONGRESS OF THE INTERNATIONAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, VOLS 1-2, 1996, : 1443 - 1449
  • [5] SECOND-LOOK OPERATION FOR OVARIAN CARCINOMA
    WALLACH, RC
    BLINICK, G
    CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY REPORTS PART 1, 1969, 53 (01): : 96 - &
  • [6] Second-look laparotomy for ovarian cancer provides reliable prognostic information and improves survival
    Friedman, RL
    Eisenkop, SM
    Wang, HJ
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1997, 67 (01) : 88 - 94
  • [7] Does systematic lymphadenectomy have a benefit on survival of suboptimally debulked patients with stage III ovarian carcinoma? A DEGOG* study
    Saygili, U
    Guclu, S
    Uslu, T
    Erten, O
    Ture, S
    Demir, N
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 81 (03) : 132 - 137
  • [8] Second-look laparotomy for stage III epithelial ovarian cancer: Rationale and current issues
    Muderspach, L
    Muggia, FM
    Conti, PS
    CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 1995, 21 (06) : 499 - 511
  • [9] The second-look operation in ovarian cancer - Should this approach be reconsidered
    Meerpohl, HG
    GYNAKOLOGE, 1997, 30 (02): : 118 - 125
  • [10] Second-look operation for epithelial ovarian cancer: Laparoscopy or laparotomy?
    AbuRustum, NR
    Barakat, RR
    Siegel, PL
    Venkatraman, E
    Curtin, JP
    Hoskins, WJ
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 88 (04): : 549 - 553