Self-efficacy for medication management: a systematic review of instruments

被引:27
|
作者
Lamarche, Larkin [1 ]
Tejpal, Ambika [1 ]
Mangin, Dee [1 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Family Med, 100 Main St West,DBHSC 5th Floor, Hamilton, ON L8P 1H6, Canada
来源
PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE | 2018年 / 12卷
关键词
self-efficacy; polypharmacy; medication; treatment burden; ADHERENCE; SCALE; INTERVENTIONS; CHECKLIST; CARE;
D O I
10.2147/PPA.S165749
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Medication self-efficacy is a potentially important construct in research around optimal use of prescription medications. A number of medication self-efficacy measures are available; however, there is no systematic review of existing instruments and cataloguing of their theoretical underpinnings or psychometric properties, strengths, and weaknesses. The aim of the study was to identify instruments that measure self-efficacy for medication management. The study also aimed to examine the quality, theoretical grounding, and psychometric evaluation of existing measures of self-efficacy for medication management. The study was a systematic review. Methods: Data were extracted from PubMed, OVID, and MEDLINE using a predefined search strategy. Citations were included if they reported the development and/or psychometric evaluation of an instrument to measure self-efficacy for medication management and were in English. Abstracts were screened for studies potentially meeting eligibility criteria. Full articles of these studies were then reviewed in depth. The review was carried out independently by two members of the research team. Results: The search identified 158 citations of which 12 were included after screening. Full review identified 3 articles fitting inclusion criteria for the review. Generally, development was theoretically grounded and included patients and experts in the field. Psychometric testing showed evidence of internal consistency (2/3 instruments) and test-retest reliability (1/3 instruments). All instruments showed some validity; however, assessment of all forms of validity for each instrument was lacking. Conclusion: Although our analysis would recommend the use of the Self-Efficacy for Appropriate Medication Use Scale because of the current evidence of validity and reliability, more psychometric evaluation is required, particularly in terms of responsiveness to change as self-efficacy is a malleable patient-level factor. Three measures of self-efficacy for medication management were identified. Overall, some evidence of reliability and/or validity was demonstrated for all instruments; however, other forms of validity were not tested (ie, responsiveness to change). Use of a well-validated measure of self-efficacy medication management is essential in order to understand relationships between medication self-efficacy and other patient-reported outcomes such as patient-centeredness, patient enablement, and burden of treatment, an important area of research that is currently lacking.
引用
收藏
页码:1279 / 1287
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Systematic review and analysis of self-efficacy in sun protection measurement instruments
    Ward, Jeanne M.
    Hardin-Fanning, Frances
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2024, 33 (05) : 390 - 399
  • [2] Self-efficacy and self-management after stroke: a systematic review
    Jones, Fiona
    Riazi, Afsane
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2011, 33 (10) : 797 - 810
  • [3] Self-efficacy instruments for individuals with coronary artery disease: a systematic review protocol
    Barbosa Almeida, Jose Alexandre
    Florencio, Rencio Bento
    Lemos, Darllane Azevedo
    Leite, Jessica Costa
    Monteiro, Karolinne Souza
    Gualdi, Lucien Peroni
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (07):
  • [4] Self-efficacy measurement instruments for individuals with coronary artery disease: A systematic review
    de Almeida, Jose Alexandre Barbosa
    Florencio, Rencio Bento
    Leite, Jessica Costa
    Monteiro, Karolinne Souza
    Gualdi, Lucien Peroni
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (03):
  • [5] Instruments to assess self-efficacy among people with cardiovascular disease: A COSMIN systematic review
    Kavradim, Selma Turan
    Yangoz, Sefika Tugba
    Ozer, Zeynep Canli
    Boz, Ilkay
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2020, 74 (11)
  • [6] Psychometric properties and performance of existing self-efficacy instruments in cancer populations: a systematic review
    Fei-Fei Huang
    Qing Yang
    An-ni Wang
    Jing-Ping Zhang
    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 16
  • [7] Psychometric properties and performance of existing self-efficacy instruments in cancer populations: a systematic review
    Huang, Fei-Fei
    Yang, Qing
    Wang, An-ni
    Zhang, Jing-Ping
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2018, 16
  • [8] Breastfeeding Self-efficacy: A Critical Review of Available Instruments
    Tuthill, Emily L.
    McGrath, Jacqueline M.
    Graber, Melanie
    Cusson, Regina M.
    Young, Sera L.
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN LACTATION, 2016, 32 (01) : 35 - 45
  • [9] Self-efficacy instruments for type 2 diabetes self-care: A systematic review of measurement properties
    Lee, Jiyeon
    Lee, Eun-Hyun
    Chae, Duckhee
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2020, 76 (08) : 2046 - 2059
  • [10] Medication Understanding and Taking Self-Efficacy Theory-Based Interventions: A Systematic Review
    Appalasamy, Jamuna Rani
    Ramaiah, Siva Seeta
    Quek, Kia Fatt
    Zain, Anuar Zaini Md
    Tha, Kyi Kyi
    JOURNAL OF YOUNG PHARMACISTS, 2020, 12 (01) : 18 - 24