Evolutionary ecology of egg size and number in a seed beetle: Genetic trade-off differs between environments

被引:2
|
作者
Czesak, ME [1 ]
Fox, CW [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kentucky, Dept Entomol, Lexington, KY 40546 USA
关键词
artificial selection; fecundity; genetic trade-off; offspring size; reproductive effort; Stator limbatus;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
In many organisms, large offspring have improved fitness over small offspring, and thus their size is under strong selection. However, due to a trade-off between offspring size and number, females producing larger offspring necessarily must produce fewer unless the total amount of reproductive effort is unlimited. Because differential gene expression among environments may affect genetic covariances among traits, it is important to consider environmental effects on the genetic relationships among traits. We compared the genetic relationships among egg size, lifetime fecundity, and female adult body mass (a trait linked to reproductive effort) in the seed beetle, Stator limbatus, between two environments (host-plant species Acacia greggii and Cercidium floridum). Genetic correlations among these traits were estimated through half-sib analysis, followed with artificial selection on egg size to observe the correlated responses of lifetime fecundity and female body mass. We found that the magnitude of the genetic trade-off between egg size and lifetime fecundity differed between environments-a strong trade-off was estimated when females laid eggs on C. floridum seeds, yet this trade-off was weak when females laid eggs on A. greggii seeds. Also differing between environments was the genetic correlation between egg size and female body mass-these traits were positively genetically correlated for egg size on A. greggii seeds, yet uncorrelated on C. floridum seeds. On A. greggii seeds, the evolution of egg size and traits linked to reproductive effort (such as female body mass) are not independent from each other as commonly assumed in life-history theory.
引用
收藏
页码:1121 / 1132
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evolutionary aspects of the trade-off between seed size and number in crops
    Sadras, Victor O.
    [J]. FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2007, 100 (2-3) : 125 - 138
  • [2] Bet-hedging as an evolutionary game: the trade-off between egg size and number
    Rees, Mark
    Jessica, C.
    Metcalf, E.
    Childs, Dylan Z.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2010, 277 (1685) : 1149 - 1151
  • [3] Bet-hedging as an evolutionary game: the trade-off between egg size and number
    Olofsson, Helen
    Ripa, Jorgen
    Jonzen, Niclas
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2009, 276 (1669) : 2963 - 2969
  • [4] LATITUDINAL CLINES - A TRADE-OFF BETWEEN EGG NUMBER AND SIZE IN PACIFIC SALMON
    FLEMING, IA
    GROSS, MR
    [J]. ECOLOGY, 1990, 71 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [5] No Trade-Off between Seed Size and Number in the Valley Oak Quercus lobata
    Koenig, Walter D.
    Knops, Johannes M. H.
    Carmen, William J.
    Sage, Richard D.
    [J]. AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2009, 173 (05): : 682 - 688
  • [6] Trade-off between egg mass and egg number in brown trout
    Jonsson, N
    Jonsson, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FISH BIOLOGY, 1999, 55 (04) : 767 - 783
  • [7] The Effect of Growth Conditions on the Seed Size/Number Trade-Off
    Paul-Victor, Cloe
    Turnbull, Lindsay A.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2009, 4 (09):
  • [8] Life history evolution in cichlids 2: directional evolution of the trade-off between egg number and egg size
    Kolm, N
    Goodwin, NB
    Balshine, S
    Reynolds, JD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2006, 19 (01) : 76 - 84
  • [9] The Genetic Basis of Natural Variation in Seed Size and Seed Number and Their Trade-Off Using Arabidopsis thaliana MAGIC Lines
    Gnan, Sebastian
    Priest, Anne
    Kover, Paula X.
    [J]. GENETICS, 2014, 198 (04) : 1751 - +
  • [10] Egg number-egg size: an important trade-off in parasite life history strategies
    Cavaleiro, Francisca I.
    Santos, Maria J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR PARASITOLOGY, 2014, 44 (3-4) : 173 - 182