The VAGUS insight into psychosis scale - Self-report and clinician-rated versions

被引:42
|
作者
Gerretsen, Philip [1 ,3 ,4 ,6 ]
Remington, Gary [2 ,4 ,6 ]
Borlido, Carol [2 ]
Quilty, Lena [4 ,6 ]
Hassan, Sabrina [2 ]
Polsinelli, Gina [2 ]
Teo, Celine [2 ]
Mar, Wanna [1 ]
Simon, Regina [3 ]
Menon, Mahesh [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Pothier, David D. [5 ,6 ]
Nakajima, Shinichiro [1 ,3 ]
Caravaggio, Fernando [1 ,4 ]
Mamo, David C. [3 ,4 ,7 ,8 ]
Rajji, Tarek K. [3 ,4 ,7 ,8 ]
Mulsant, Benoit H. [3 ,4 ,6 ]
Deluca, Vincenzo [3 ,4 ,7 ,8 ]
Ganguli, Rohan [2 ,4 ,6 ]
Pollock, Bruce G. [3 ,4 ,6 ]
Graff-Guerrero, Ariel [1 ,3 ,4 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Addict & Mental Hlth, Res Imaging Ctr, Multimodal Imaging Grp, Toronto, ON M5T 1R8, Canada
[2] Ctr Addict & Mental Hlth, Schizophrenia Program, Toronto, ON M5T 1R8, Canada
[3] Ctr Addict & Mental Hlth, Div Geriatr Psychiat, Toronto, ON M5T 1R8, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Hlth Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Ctr Addict & Mental Hlth, Campbell Family Mental Hlth Res Inst, Toronto, ON M5T 1R8, Canada
[7] Univ Malta, Fac Med, Dept Psychiat, Msida, Malta
[8] Univ Malta, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Psychiat, Msida, Malta
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Insight; Illness Awareness; Schizophrenia; Schizoaffective disorder; Symptom assessment; SCHIZOPHRENIA; ILLNESS; NUMBER; RTMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.psychres.2014.08.005
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to develop self-report and clinician-rated versions of an insight scale that would be easy to administer, sensitive to small changes, and inclusive of the core dimensions of clinical insight into psychosis. Ten-item self-report (VAGUS-SR) and five-item clinician-rated (VAGUS-CR) scales were designed to measure the dimensions of insight into psychosis and evaluated in 215 and 140 participants, respectively (www.vagusonline.com). Tests of reliability and validity were performed. Both the VAGUS-SR and VAGUS-CR showed good internal consistency and reliability. They demonstrated good convergent and discriminant validity. Both versions were strongly correlated with one another and with the Schedule for the Assessment of Insight and Birchwood Insight Scale. Exploratory factor analyses identified three possible latent components of insight. The VAGUS-CR and VAGUS-SR are valid, reliable and easy to administer. They are build on previous insight scales with separate clinician-rated and self-report versions. The VAGUS-SR exhibited a multidimensional factor structure. Using a 10-point Likert scale for each item, the VAGUS has the capacity to detect small, temporally sensitive changes in insight, which is essential for intervention studies with neurostimulation or rapidly acting medications. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1084 / 1089
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The VAGUS- Self-Report & Clinician-Rated Versions: A Novel Insight into Psychosis Scale for Use Across the Adult Late-Life Span
    Gerretsen, Philip
    Remington, Gary
    Borlido, Carol
    Quilty, Lena C.
    Hassan, Sabrina
    Polsinelli, Gina
    Mar, Wanna
    Teo, Celine
    Simon, Regina
    Pothier, David
    Menon, Mahesh
    Nakajima, Shinichiro
    Caravaggio, Fernando
    Mamo, David
    Rajji, Tarek K.
    Mulsant, Benoit H.
    Deluca, Vincenzo
    Ganguli, Rohan
    Pollock, Bruce G.
    Graff-Guerrero, Ariel
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 22 (03): : S93 - S94
  • [2] Comparison of clinician-rated and self-report insight in Korean patients with schizophrenia using VAGUS insight scale
    Jeong, Seong Hoon
    Chung, In-Won
    Jung, Hee Yeon
    Hwang, Samuel S.
    Kim, Se Hyun
    Youn, Tak
    Chung, Jun Ku
    Kim, Yong Sik
    [J]. PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2017, 258 : 93 - 100
  • [3] The Measure of Insight into Cognition: Reliability and validity of clinician-rated and self-report scales of neurocognitive insight for schizophrenia
    Saperstein, Alice M.
    Thysen, Julie
    Medalia, Alice
    [J]. SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2012, 134 (01) : 54 - 58
  • [4] Relationship Between Self-Report and Clinician-Rated Impairment in Depressed Outpatients
    Teresa L. Kramer
    Richard R. Owen
    Crystal Wilson
    Carol R. Thrush
    [J]. Community Mental Health Journal, 2003, 39 : 299 - 307
  • [5] Relationship between self-report and clinician-rated impairment in depressed outpatients
    Kramer, TL
    Owen, RR
    Wilson, C
    Thrush, CR
    [J]. COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH JOURNAL, 2003, 39 (04) : 299 - 307
  • [6] EXAMINING DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN SELF-REPORT AND CLINICIAN-RATED ASSESSMENTS OF PSYCHOSIS RISK: DOES INTERNALIZED STIGMA MATTER?
    Shan, LeeAnn
    Millman, Zachary B.
    DeLuca, Joseph
    Klaunig, Mallory J.
    Rouhakhtar, Pamela Rakhshan
    Lucksted, Alicia
    Medoff, Deborah R.
    [J]. SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN, 2020, 46 : S41 - S41
  • [7] PSYCHOLOGICAL READINESS FOR LUNG TRANSPLANT CHARACTERIZED BY SELF-REPORT AND CLINICIAN-RATED MEASURES
    Henderson, Danielle R.
    [J]. ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2019, 53 : S328 - S328
  • [8] Assessing psychosis in the general population: Self-rated versus clinician-rated
    Nordgaard, Julie
    Pedersen, Marlene Buch
    Hastrup, Lene Halling
    Haahr, Ulrik Helt
    Simonsen, Erik
    [J]. SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2019, 206 : 446 - 447
  • [9] Symptom dimensions in obsessive-compulsive disorder: Factor analysis on a clinician-rated scale and a self-report measure
    Denys, D
    de Geus, F
    van Megen, HJGM
    Westenberg, HGM
    [J]. PSYCHOPATHOLOGY, 2004, 37 (04) : 181 - 189
  • [10] SELF-REPORT AND CLINICIAN-RATED MEASURES OF DEPRESSION SEVERITY: CAN ONE REPLACE THE OTHER?
    Uher, Rudolf
    Perlis, Roy H.
    Placentino, Anna
    Dernovsek, Mojca Zvezdana
    Henigsberg, Neven
    Mors, Ole
    Maier, Wolfgang
    McGuffin, Peter
    Farmer, Anne
    [J]. DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY, 2012, 29 (12) : 1043 - 1049