Clinical and endocrine effects of a microdose GnRH agonist flare regimen administered to poor responders who are undergoing in vitro fertilization

被引:194
|
作者
Surrey, ES
Bower, J
Hill, DM
Ramsey, J
Surrey, MW
机构
[1] Reprod Med & Surg Associates, Beverly Hills, CA USA
[2] Century City Hosp, Ctr Reprod Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
GnRH agonist; ovulation induction; in vitro fertilization;
D O I
10.1016/S0015-0282(97)00575-X
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the endocrine and clinical responses to microdose GnRH agonist (GnRH-a) that was administered in the early follicular phase before controlled ovarian hyperstimulation to poor responders who were candidates for IVF-ET. Design: Prospective nonrandomized trial with historical controls. Setting: Tertiary care university-affiliate infertility practice. Patient(s): Thirty-four IVF-ET candidates with a prior poor response to a standard long-protocol GnRH-a controlled ovarian hyperstimulation regimen (cycle A). Patients were divided into two groups based on their age at the initiation of cycle A (Group 1: less than or equal to 39 years, n = 15; Group 2: greater than or equal to 40 years, n = 19). Intervention(s): Low-dose oral contraceptive (x 21 d) followed by GnRH-a (leuprolide acetate; 40 mu g SC b.i.d.) flare and urofollitropin initiated on day 3 of GnRH-a administration (cycle B). Main Outcome Measure(s): Comparative analysis of clinical responses (total urofollitropin dose used and number of oocytes retrieved as well as fertilization and clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates) and endocrine responses (serum E-2, FSH, LH, T, and P levels) between cycles A and B in the two groups. Early follicular phase serum E, and FSH changes in groups 1 and 2 were compared with changes in nine normal responder controls who were receiving a standard long-protocol GnRH-a/urofollitropin regimen (group 3). Result(s): Maximal E-2 levels as well as clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates were higher in cycle B patients receiving microdose GnRH-a. Cancellation rates in cycle B were lower than in cycle A. Statistically significant increases in treatment day 6 serum FSH levels were noted during cycle B in both groups 1 and 2 but not in group 3 controls. No abnormal rises in LH, P, or T were noted in any of the groups. Conclusion(s): Microdose GnRH-a enhances urofollitropin response and clinical outcome in poor responders undergoing IVF-ET. This may be due to enhanced release of early follicular phase endogenous FSH without concomitant deleterious rises in androgen levels or corpus luteum rescue. (C) 1998 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:419 / 424
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] GNRH ANTAGONIST/LETROZOLE VERSUS MICRODOSE GNRH AGONIST FLARE PROTOCOL IN POOR RESPONDERS UNDERGOING IN VITRO FERTILIZATION
    Davar, Robab
    Oskouian, Homa
    Ahmadi, Shahnaz
    Firouzabadi, Razieh Dehghani
    [J]. TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 49 (03): : 297 - 301
  • [2] A comparison of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist and GnRH agonist flare protocols for poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization
    Berin, Inna
    Stein, Daniel E.
    Keltz, Martin D.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2010, 93 (02) : 360 - 363
  • [3] MICRODOSE GnRH AGONIST FLARE-UP VERSUS FLEXIBLE GnRH ANTAGONIST PROTOCOL IN POOR RESPONDERS UNDERGOING IN-VITRO-FERTILIZATION (IVF) CYCLES: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL.
    Malhotra, N.
    Singh, N.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2013, 100 (03) : S106 - S106
  • [4] GnRH antagonists and poor responders: Is there hope after a failed microdose agonist flare cycle?
    Chen, SH
    Mack, CK
    Cekleniak, NA
    Garrisi, MG
    Schramm, AT
    Sable, DB
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2002, 78 (03) : S150 - S150
  • [5] Comparison of mild and microdose GnRH agonist flare protocols on IVF outcome in poor responders
    Mohammad Ali Karimzadeh
    Mehri Mashayekhy
    Farnaz Mohammadian
    Fatemeh Mansoori Moghaddam
    [J]. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2011, 283 : 1159 - 1164
  • [6] Comparison of mild and microdose GnRH agonist flare protocols on IVF outcome in poor responders
    Karimzadeh, Mohammad Ali
    Mashayekhy, Mehri
    Mohammadian, Farnaz
    Moghaddam, Fatemeh Mansoori
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2011, 283 (05) : 1159 - 1164
  • [7] Comparing a microdose flare to a GnRH antagonist protocol for poor responder patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization.
    Hollett-Caines, J
    Feyles, V
    Rebel, M
    Power, S
    Tekpetey, F
    Abu-Rafea, B
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2005, 84 : S432 - S432
  • [8] Pregnancy rates are maintained in poor responders with a simple GnRH antagonist protocol compared to microdose GnRH agonist flare.
    Hurst, BS
    Matthews, MM
    Papadakis, MA
    Marshburn, PB
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2002, 78 (03) : S175 - S175
  • [9] Pregnancy outcome in delayed start antagonist versus microdose flare GnRH agonist protocol in poor responders undergoing IVF/ICSI: An RCT
    Davar, Robab
    Neghab, Nosrat
    Naghshineh, Elham
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE, 2018, 16 (04) : 255 - 260
  • [10] Agonist "flare-up" versus antagonist in the management of poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment
    Mohamed, KA
    Davies, WAR
    Allsopp, J
    Lashen, H
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2005, 83 (02) : 331 - 335