Multidimensional item response theory and the Force Concept Inventory

被引:31
|
作者
Stewart, John [1 ]
Zabriskie, Cabot [1 ]
DeVore, Seth [1 ]
Stewar, Gay [1 ]
机构
[1] West Virginia Univ, Dept Phys & Astron, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
来源
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
KNOWLEDGE; VALIDITY; COHERENCE; CURVES; EXPERT;
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.010137
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Research on the test structure of the Force Concept Inventory (FCI) has largely been performed with exploratory methods such as factor analysis and cluster analysis. Multidimensional Item Response Theory (MIRT) provides an alternative to traditional exploratory factor analysis which allows statistical testing to identify the optimal number of factors. Application of MIRT to a sample of N = 4716 FCI post-tests identified a 9-factor solution as optimal. Additional analysis showed that a substantial part of the identified factor structure resulted from the practice of using problem blocks and from pairs of similar questions. Applying MIRT to a reduced set of FCI items removing blocked items and repeated items produced a 6-factor solution; however, the factors still had little relation the general structure of Newtonian mechanics. A theoretical model of the FCI was constructed from expert solutions and fit to the FCI by constraining the MIRT parameter matrix to the theoretical model. Variations on the theoretical model were then explored to identify an optimal model. The optimal model supported the differentiation of Newton's 1st and 2nd law; of one-dimensional and three-dimensional kinematics; and of the principle of the addition of forces from Newton's 2nd law. The model suggested by the authors of the FCI was also fit; the optimal MIRT model was statistically superior.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Analyzing force concept inventory with item response theory
    Wang, Jing
    Bao, Lei
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2010, 78 (10) : 1064 - 1070
  • [2] An item response curves analysis of the Force Concept Inventory
    Morris, Gary A.
    Harshman, Nathan
    Branum-Martin, Lee
    Mazur, Eric
    Mzoughi, Taha
    Baker, Stephen D.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2012, 80 (09) : 825 - 831
  • [3] Multidimensional item response theory and the force and motion conceptual evaluation
    Yang, Jie
    Zabriskie, Cabot
    Stewart, John
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2019, 15 (02):
  • [4] Multidimensional Item Response Theory
    Yao, Lihua
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT, 2010, 47 (04) : 477 - 481
  • [5] Multidimensional Item Response Theory
    Brossman, Bradley Grant
    Lee, Won-Chan
    [J]. APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2010, 34 (08) : 641 - 645
  • [6] Multidimensional Item Response Theory
    Chang, Hua-Hua
    Wang, Chun
    [J]. PSYCHOMETRIKA, 2011, 76 (03) : 504 - 506
  • [7] Identifying a preinstruction to postinstruction factor model for the Force Concept Inventory within a multitrait item response theory framework
    Eaton, Philip
    Willoughby, Shannon
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2020, 16 (01):
  • [8] Improving psychometric assessment of the Beck Depression Inventory using Multidimensional Item Response Theory
    Fragoso, Tiago M.
    Curi, Mariana
    [J]. BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 55 (04) : 527 - 540
  • [9] Developments in multidimensional item response theory
    Ackerman, T
    [J]. APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1996, 20 (04) : 309 - 310
  • [10] Modeling the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) - Strengths and Weaknesses of a Multidimensional Item Response Theory Approach
    Ueckert, Sebastian
    Lockwood, Peter
    Schwartz, Pam
    Riley, Steve
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS, 2015, 42 : S92 - S92