Risk-based surveillance of avian influenza in Australia's wild birds

被引:13
|
作者
Tracey, John P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ind & Investment NSW, Vertebrate Pest Res Unit, Invas Anim Cooperat Res Ctr, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia
关键词
TEAL ANAS-GRACILIS; A VIRUS; NOMADIC WATERFOWL; IDENTIFYING AREAS; AQUATIC BIRDS; DUCKS; POPULATIONS; INFECTION; EPIDEMIOLOGY; EVOLUTION;
D O I
10.1071/WR09152
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Context. The epidemiology of avian influenza and the ecology of wild birds are inextricably linked. An understanding of both is essential in assessing and managing the risks of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI). Aims. This project investigates the abundance, movements and breeding ecology of Australia's Anseriformes in relation to the prevalence of low-pathogenicity avian influenza (LPAI) and provides risk profiles to improve the efficiency and relevance of wild-bird surveillance. Methods. Generalised linear models and analysis of variance were used to examine the determinants of Anseriformes abundance and movements in Australia, and the observed prevalence of LPAI in Australia (n = 33 139) and overseas (n = 93 344). Risk profiles were developed using poultry density, estimated LPAI prevalence, the abundance of Anseriformes, and the probability of Anseriformes moving from areas of HPAI epizootics. Key results. Analysis of Australian wild-bird surveillance data strongly supports other studies that have found the prevalence of LPAI in wild birds to be much lower (1%) in Australia than that in other countries (4.7%). LPAI prevalence was highly variable among sampling periods and locations and significantly higher in dabbling ducks than in other functional groups. Trends in Anseriformes movements, abundance and breeding are also variable, and correlated with rainfall, which could explain low prevalence and the failure to detect seasonal differences in LPAI in wild birds. Virus prevalence of faecal samples was significantly lower, whereas collecting faecal samples was 3-5 times less expensive and logistically simpler, than that of cloacal samples. Overall priority areas for on-going surveillance are provided for Australia. Conclusions. Previous surveillance has occurred in high-priority areas, with the exception of Mareeba (North Queensland), Brisbane and Darwin, and has provided valuable information on the role of wild birds in maintaining avian influenza viruses. However, several practical considerations need to be addressed for future surveillance. Implications. Long-term surveillance studies in wild birds in priority areas are required, which incorporate information on bird abundance, age, behaviour, breeding and movements, particularly for dabbling ducks. This is important to validate trends of LPAI prevalence, in understanding the main determinants for virus spread and persistence, and in predicting and managing future epizootics of HPAI in Australia.
引用
收藏
页码:134 / 144
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risk-based surveillance for H5N1 avian influenza virus in wild birds in Great Britain
    Snow, L. C.
    Newson, S. E.
    Musgrove, A. J.
    Cranswick, P. A.
    Crick, H. Q. P.
    Wilesmith, J. W.
    [J]. VETERINARY RECORD, 2007, 161 (23) : 775 - 781
  • [2] Surveillance of Wild Birds for Avian Influenza Virus
    Hoye, Bethany J.
    Munster, Vincent J.
    Nishiura, Hiroshi
    Klaassen, Marcel
    Fouchier, Ron A. M.
    [J]. EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2010, 16 (12) : 1827 - 1834
  • [3] Evaluating surveillance in wild birds by the application of risk assessment of avian influenza introduction into Spain
    Martinez, M.
    Perez, A. M.
    De La Torre, A.
    Iglesias, I.
    Sanchez-Vizcaino, J. M.
    Munoz, M. J.
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2011, 139 (01): : 91 - 98
  • [4] Avian influenza surveillance in wild birds in the European Union in 2006
    Hesterberg, Uta
    Harris, Kate
    Stroud, David
    Guberti, Vittorio
    Busani, Luca
    Pittman, Maria
    Piazza, Valentina
    Cook, Alasdair
    Brown, Ian
    [J]. INFLUENZA AND OTHER RESPIRATORY VIRUSES, 2009, 3 (01) : 1 - 14
  • [5] Surveillance for Avian Influenza in Wild Birds in the European Union in 2007
    Breed, Andrew C.
    Harris, Kate
    Hesterberg, Uta
    Gould, George
    Londt, Brandon Z.
    Brown, Ian H.
    Cook, Alasdair J. C.
    [J]. AVIAN DISEASES, 2010, 54 (01) : 399 - 404
  • [6] Development of an active risk-based surveillance strategy for avian influenza in Cuba
    Ferrer, E.
    Alfonso, P.
    Ippoliti, C.
    Abeledo, M.
    Calistri, P.
    Blanco, P.
    Conte, A.
    Sanchez, B.
    Fonseca, O.
    Percedo, M.
    Perez, A.
    Fernanadez, O.
    Giovannini, A.
    [J]. PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2014, 116 (1-2) : 161 - 167
  • [7] Avian Influenza Surveillance in Wild Birds at Moreton Bay, Queensland
    Kung, Nina
    Field, Hume
    [J]. ECOHEALTH, 2011, 7 : S24 - S25
  • [8] Avian Influenza Virus Surveillance and Wild Birds: Past and Present
    Krauss, Scott
    Webster, Robert G.
    [J]. AVIAN DISEASES, 2010, 54 (01) : 394 - 398
  • [9] Surveillance for highly pathogenic avian influenza in wild birds in the USA
    DeLiberto, Thomas J.
    Swafford, Seth R.
    Nolte, Dale L.
    Pedersen, Kerri
    Lutman, Mark W.
    Schmit, Brandon B.
    Baroch, John A.
    Kohler, Dennis J.
    Franklin, Alan
    [J]. INTEGRATIVE ZOOLOGY, 2009, 4 (04): : 426 - 439
  • [10] The role of wild aquatic birds in the epidemiology of avian influenza in Australia
    Turner, AJ
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2004, 82 (11) : 713 - 713