Comparison between the technologies for food waste treatment

被引:72
|
作者
Gao, Anqi [1 ]
Tian, Zhenyu [1 ]
Wang, Ziyi [1 ]
Wennersten, Ronald [1 ]
Sun, Qie [1 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ, Jinan 250061, Peoples R China
关键词
Food Waste; LCA; Anaerobic digestion; Disposal;
D O I
10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.811
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Based on life cycle assessment (LCA), this paper compares five different methods for food waste treatment. To achieve it, the environmental performance of food waste in Shandong University as a case study is evaluated. The case study indicates that saving food is the ultimate way to reduce environment impact and the distance for transportation also affects a lot. The result of comparison shows that landfill contributes most to climate change, which is about 10 times larger than others. For acidification and eutrophication, incineration shows the worst result 7.77 PAF*m(2)yr. And composting has the largest impact on carcinogens with the result 3.49E-05 DALY. On the whole, the waste treatment technologies are recommended in proper sequence from anaerobic digestion, heat-moisture reaction, composting and incineration to landfill. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison and analysis of several medical waste treatment technologies
    Xu, Lufeng
    Dong, Kun
    Zhang, Yiming
    Li, Haixiang
    [J]. 2020 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREEN DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 615
  • [2] The environmental impacts of alternative food waste treatment technologies in the US
    Thyberg, Krista L.
    Tonjes, David J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 158 : 101 - 108
  • [3] Home Composting Method for the Treatment Technologies of Food Waste: A Review
    Sarani, Noor Amira
    Kadir, Aeslina Abdul
    Hassan, Mohd Ikhmal Haqeem
    Hamid, Nur Jannah Abdul
    Hashar, Nurul Nabila Huda
    Hashim, Azini Amiza
    Hissham, Nur Fatin Nabila
    Sie, Ng Jes
    Zakarya, Irnis Azura
    [J]. 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREEN ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 616
  • [4] Critical Factors and Emerging Opportunities in Food Waste Utilization and Treatment Technologies
    Jones, Sarah L.
    Gibson, Kristen E.
    Ricke, Steven C.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2021, 5
  • [5] Waste water treatment plant energy conversion technologies comparison
    Oliveira, Luciano Basto
    Bufoni, Andre Luiz
    Pedroso, Luiz Roberto Martins
    Victer, Wagner
    [J]. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 2019, 13 (3-4): : 410 - 430
  • [6] Waste water treatment plant energy conversion technologies comparison
    Oliveira, Luciano Basto
    Bufoni, Andre Luiz
    Martins Pedroso, Luiz Roberto
    Victer, Wagner
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 13 (3-4) : 410 - 430
  • [7] Life cycle cost–benefit efficiency of food waste treatment technologies in China
    Ziyao Fan
    Huijuan Dong
    Yong Geng
    Minoru Fujii
    [J]. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2023, 25 : 4935 - 4956
  • [8] Hazardous waste treatment technologies
    Cha, DK
    Song, JS
    Sarr, D
    Kim, BJ
    [J]. WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 1996, 68 (04) : 575 - 586
  • [9] Hazardous waste treatment technologies
    Khan, Eakalak
    Huang, C. P.
    Reed, Brian E.
    [J]. WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 2005, 77 (06) : 2144 - 2243
  • [10] Hazardous waste treatment technologies
    Li, Minghua
    Mahmudov, Rovshan
    Huang, C.P.
    [J]. Water Environment Research, 2013, 85 (10) : 1646 - 1677