Incidence of mandibular distraction osteogenesis in Stickler Syndrome: Variation due to COL2A1 and COL11A1

被引:3
|
作者
Swanson, Dan [1 ]
Ba'th, Fadlullah [2 ]
Zavala, Hanan [3 ]
Chinnadurai, Siva [3 ]
Roby, Brianne Barnett [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Georgetown Univ, Sch Med, Washington, DC USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Sch Med, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[3] Childrens Minnesota ENT & Facial Plast Surg, Minneapolis, MN USA
[4] Univ Minnesota, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Minneapolis, MN USA
关键词
Robin sequence; Stickler; Micrognathia; Mandibular distraction osteogenesis; MUTATIONS; SERIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijporl.2021.110749
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine whether the two most common genetic mutations seen in Stickler Syndrome (SS) (COL2A1 and COL11A1) affect the incidence of mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) and what impact Robin sequence (RS) has on diagnosis. SS is an autosomal dominant connective tissue disorder characterized by almost complete penetrance. COL2A1 and COL11A1 are the two most common mutations seen in SS patients. SS often presents at birth with RS, which is characterized by the triad of micrognathia, glossoptosis, and tongue based airway obstruction. MDO is one surgical intervention that has been shown to be successful in relieving tongue base obstruction and is the surgical intervention of choice for this condition. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients with a diagnosis of SS at a tertiary pediatric hospital between January 1, 2003 and December 31, 2018. The included patient charts were reviewed for demographic information, SS mutation, and history of MDO. Forty-six patients had a clinical diagnosis of SS. Of those, 31 met inclusion criteria which involved having a molecular diagnosis of SS and sufficient follow up information to determine if MDO was indicated or performed. Twenty-two of the 31 included patients had a diagnosis of RS (70.96%). Thirteen of the 31 patients (41.94%) included in this study required MDO as a neonate. Results: Fifty-percent of patients with type I (COL2A1) required MDO as a neonate compared to only 31% of patients with type II (COL11A1), though the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant. Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that patients with type I mutation may have a higher incidence of MDO than patients with a type II mutation, though further research with larger sample sizes is needed. This information is helpful in counseling those with SS or family history of SS about what they can expect related to RS and need for MDO based on genetic findings. Level of Evidence: 3
引用
收藏
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Hearing Outcomes in Stickler Syndrome: Variation Due to COL2A1 and COL11A1
    Bath, Fadlullah
    Swanson, Dan
    Zavala, Hanan
    Chinnadurai, Siva
    Roby, Brianne B.
    CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2022, 59 (08): : 970 - 975
  • [2] Stickler Syndrome and the Vitreous Phenotype: Mutations in COL2A1 and COL11A1
    Richards, Allan J.
    McNinch, Annie
    Martin, Howard
    Oakhill, Kim
    Rai, Harjeet
    Waller, Sarah
    Treacy, Becky
    Whittaker, Joanne
    Meredith, Sarah
    Poulson, Arabella
    Snead, Martin P.
    HUMAN MUTATION, 2010, 31 (06) : E1461 - E1471
  • [3] Stickler syndrome and the vitreous phenotype: correlation with mutations in COL2A1 and COL11A1
    Richards, Allan
    Martin, H.
    Oakhill, K.
    Rai, H.
    Treacy, B.
    Whittaker, J.
    Poulson, A.
    Snead, M.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2009, 46 : S84 - S84
  • [4] Novel and recurrent COL11A1 and COL2A1 mutations in the Marshall-Stickler syndrome spectrum
    Guo L.
    Elcioglu N.H.
    Wang Z.
    Demirkol Y.K.
    Isguven P.
    Matsumoto N.
    Nishimura G.
    Miyake N.
    Ikegawa S.
    Human Genome Variation, 4 (1)
  • [5] Phenotypic characterization of patients with early-onset high myopia due to mutations in COL2A1 or COL11A1: Why not Stickler syndrome?
    Zhou, Lin
    Xiao, Xueshan
    Li, Shiqiang
    Jia, Xiaoyun
    Wang, Panfeng
    Sun, Wenmin
    Zhang, Fengsheng
    Li, Jiazhang
    Li, Tuo
    Zhang, Qingjiong
    MOLECULAR VISION, 2018, 24 : 560 - 573
  • [6] Stickler syndrome with mutation in the COL11A1 gene
    Mukai, S
    Annunen, S
    Ala-Kokko, L
    Körkkö, J
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1999, 40 (04) : S467 - S467
  • [7] Stickler syndrome type 2 and linkage to the COL11A1 gene
    Snead, MP
    Yates, JRW
    Williams, R
    Payne, SJ
    Pope, FM
    Scott, JD
    MOLECULAR AND DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY OF CARTILAGE, 1996, 785 : 331 - 332
  • [8] Mutation survey and genotype-phenotype analysis of COL2A1 and COL11A1 genes in 16 Chinese patients with Stickler syndrome
    Wang, Xun
    Jia, Xiaoyun
    Xiao, Xueshan
    Li, Shiqiang
    Li, Jie
    Li, Yadi
    Wei, Yantao
    Liang, Xiaoling
    Guo, Xiangming
    MOLECULAR VISION, 2016, 22 : 697 - 704
  • [9] De novo COL11A1 and COL9A2 variants corresponding to Stickler syndrome phenotype
    Vazquez Rodriguez, Jose
    Santos, Milexis
    Serrano Rodriguez, Genesis
    Carlo, Simon
    Velez-Bartolomei, Frances
    Santiago Cornier, Alberto
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 24 (03) : S169 - S169
  • [10] Expanding the phenotype spectrum associated with pathogenic variants in the COL2A1 and COL11A1 genes
    Copikova, Jana
    Paderova, Jana
    Romankova, Vera
    Havlovicova, Marketa
    Balascakova, Miroslava
    Zelinova, Michacla
    Vejvalkova, Sarka
    Simandlova, Martina
    Stepankova, Jana
    Horinova, Vera
    Kantorova, Eva
    Kreckova, Gabricla
    Pospisilova, Jana
    Boday, Arpad
    Meszarosova, Anna Uhrova
    Turnovec, Marek
    Votypka, Pavel
    Liskova, Petra
    Kremlikova Pourova, Radka
    ANNALS OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2020, 84 (05) : 380 - 392