Landscape patterns of primary production reveal agricultural benefits from forest conservation

被引:11
|
作者
Sousa, Jakelyne S. B. [1 ]
Longo, Maria G. [2 ]
Santos, Braulio A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Pernambuco, Programa Posgrad Biol Vegetal, BR-50670901 Recife, PE, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Paraiba, Programa Posgrad Desenvolvimento & Meio Ambiente, BR-58051900 Joao Pessoa, PB, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Paraiba, Dept Sistemat & Ecol, BR-58051900 Joao Pessoa, PB, Brazil
关键词
Ecosystem services; Forest biomass; Habitat loss; Habitat fragmentation; Human-modified landscapes; Landscape composition; Landscape configuration; Landscape structure; BRAZILIAN ATLANTIC FOREST; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; RAIN-FOREST; LAND-USE; PHYLOGENETIC DIVERSITY; WATER RELATIONS; CONFIGURATION; BIODIVERSITY; SUGARCANE; HETEROGENEITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.pecon.2019.08.001
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Primary production (PP) is a fundamental ecosystem function that influences several ecosystem services. However, little is known about how changes in landscape structure resulting from agricultural expansion affects forest and cropland production. We investigated the effect of landscape composition and configuration on the PP of forests and sugarcane crops in an old agricultural frontier of the Brazilian Atlantic forest. Using satellite images and a comprehensive dataset of vegetation indices that are proxies of PP (NDVI and EVI), we sampled 1201-km(2) landscapes during the rainy and dry seasons of 2011-2016. In each landscape we quantified the indices, the percentage of sugarcane crops, the density of forest edges, and the number of forest patches. The NDVI and EVI of the entire landscape were negatively influenced by the percentage of croplands in both seasons and weakly affected by edge density and number of forest patches. When analyzing the NDVI of forests and croplands separately, both were negatively affected by the percentage of croplands. This indicates that forests and croplands are less productive in more deforested landscapes. The spatial variability of NDVI and EVI within the landscapes, estimated with coefficients of variation, was not affected by landscape attributes. Our findings indicate that landscape composition (i.e. forest cover) is more important than spatial configuration in determining the PP of forest and sugarcane crops, reinforcing the need to conserve forests in agricultural landscapes. We recommend reducing deforestation, restoring abandoned fields, protecting forest remnants and avoiding forest fragmentation to sustain more productive environmental-friendly agricultural landscapes. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. on behalf of Associacao Brasileira de Ciencia Ecologica e Conservacao.
引用
收藏
页码:136 / 145
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Are agricultural production and forest conservation compatible? Agricultural diversity, agricultural incomes and primary forest cover among small farm colonists in the Amazon
    Perz, SG
    [J]. WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2004, 32 (06) : 957 - 977
  • [2] Participatory conservation approaches for satoyama, the traditional forest and agricultural landscape of Japan
    Kobori, H
    Primack, RB
    [J]. AMBIO, 2003, 32 (04) : 307 - 311
  • [3] Nonlinear imprints of forest coverage on the relationships between gross primary production (GPP) and landscape patterns
    Gao, Haiqiang
    Liu, Shuguang
    Feng, Shuailong
    Peng, Xi
    Ning, Ying
    Shi, Yi
    Wang, Zhao
    Wei, Baojing
    Yan, Wende
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2023, 146
  • [4] Using metagenomics to reveal landscape scale patterns of denitrifiers in a montane forest ecosystem
    Roco, C. Armanda
    Dorsch, Peter
    Booth, James G.
    Pepe-Ranney, Charles
    Groffman, Peter M.
    Fahey, Timothy J.
    Yavitt, Joseph B.
    Shapleigh, James P.
    [J]. SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 2019, 138
  • [5] Conservation value of linear woody remnants for two forest carnivores in a Mediterranean agricultural landscape
    Pereira, Marian
    Rodriguez, Alejandro
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2010, 47 (03) : 611 - 620
  • [6] Dung beetles and the conservation of diversity in an agricultural landscape with maize fields and Atlantic Forest remnants
    Alves, Victor Michelon
    Hettwer Giehl, Eduardo Luis
    Lovato, Paulo Emilio
    Vaz-de-Mello, Fernando Zagury
    Agudelo, Marcelo Betancur
    Medina Hernandez, Malva Isabel
    [J]. ACTA OECOLOGICA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 2020, 107
  • [7] Ambivalence and Contradictions: A Case from Mountain Agricultural Landscape Conservation
    Norbye, Anne-Katrine Brun
    [J]. ETHNOS, 2018, 83 (03) : 440 - 454
  • [8] Implementation of landscape planning and nature conservation in the agricultural landscape -: a case study from Saxony
    Lütz, M
    Bastian, O
    [J]. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2002, 92 (2-3) : 159 - 170
  • [9] Agricultural Productivity and Forest Conservation: Evidence from the Brazilian Amazon
    Koch, Nicolas
    zu Ermgassen, Erasmus K. H. J.
    Wehkamp, Johanna
    Oliveira Filho, Francisco J. B.
    Schwerhoff, Gregor
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 101 (03) : 919 - 940
  • [10] Increasing forest utilization within Bhutan's forest conservation framework: The economic benefits of charcoal production
    Feuerbacher, Arndt
    Siebold, Matthias
    Chhetri, Ashit
    Lippert, Christian
    Sander, Klas
    [J]. FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2016, 73 : 99 - 111