The Phylogeny of Rays and Skates (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii) Based on Morphological Characters Revisited

被引:11
|
作者
Villalobos-Segura, Eduardo [1 ]
Marrama, Giuseppe [2 ]
Carnevale, Giorgio [2 ]
Claeson, Kerin M. [3 ]
Underwood, Charlie J. [4 ]
Naylor, Gavin J. P. [5 ]
Kriwet, Juergen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vienna, Fac Earth Sci Geog & Astron, Dept Palaeontol, Evolutionary Morphol Res Grp, Josef Holaubek Pl 2, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[2] Univ Torino, Dipartimento Sci Terra, Via Valperga Caluso 35, I-10125 Turin, Italy
[3] Philadelphia Coll Osteopath Med, Philadelphia, PA 19103 USA
[4] Birkbeck Coll, Sch Earth Sci, Malet St, London WC1E 7HX, England
[5] Univ Florida, Florida Museum Nat Hist, 1659 Museum Rd, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
来源
DIVERSITY-BASEL | 2022年 / 14卷 / 06期
基金
奥地利科学基金会;
关键词
character revision; phylogenetic analysis; morphology; Mesozoic; Cenozoic; fossils; BATOID FISHES CHONDRICHTHYES; FRESH-WATER STINGRAYS; ROSTRAL CARTILAGES; TRIBODUS-LIMAE; SHARK; ANATOMY; SYSTEMATICS; EVOLUTION; SKELETON; INTERRELATIONSHIPS;
D O I
10.3390/d14060456
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Elasmobranchii are relatively well-studied. However, numerous phylogenetic uncertainties about their relationships remain. Here, we revisit the phylogenetic evidence based on a detailed morphological re-evaluation of all the major extant batomorph clades (skates and rays), including several holomorphic fossil taxa from the Palaeozoic, Mesozoic and Cenozoic, and an extensive outgroup sampling, which includes sharks, chimaeras and several other fossil chondrichthyans. The parsimony and maximum-likelihood analyses found more resolved but contrasting topologies, with the Bayesian inference tree neither supporting nor disfavouring any of them. Overall, the analyses result in similar clade compositions and topologies, with the Jurassic batomorphs forming the sister clade to all the other batomorphs, whilst all the Cretaceous batomorphs are nested within the remaining main clades. The disparate arrangements recovered under the different criteria suggest that a detailed study of Jurassic taxa is of utmost importance to present a more consistent topology in the deeper nodes, as issues continue to be present when analysing those clades previously recognized only by molecular analyses (e.g., Rhinopristiformes and Torpediniformes). The consistent placement of fossil taxa within specific groups by the different phylogenetic criteria is promising and indicates that the inclusion of more fossil taxa in the present matrix will likely not cause loss of resolution, therefore suggesting that a strong phylogenetic signal can be recovered from fossil taxa.
引用
收藏
页数:61
相关论文
共 50 条