Recognition-induced forgetting does not occur for temporally grouped objects unless they are semantically related

被引:11
|
作者
Maxcey, Ashleigh M. [1 ]
Glenn, Hannah [2 ]
Stansberry, Elisabeth [3 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Psychol, 1835 Neil Ave, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Psychol, Nashville, TN 37240 USA
[3] Tennessee State Univ, Dept Psychol, Nashville, TN 37203 USA
关键词
Visual long-term memory; Long-term memory; Recognition memory; Recollection; Familiarity; Recognition-induced forgetting; LONG-TERM-MEMORY; PERIRHINAL CORTEX; CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS; EPISODIC MEMORY; RETRIEVAL; HIPPOCAMPUS; CONTEXT; REPRESENTATIONS; INFORMATION; CONSCIOUSNESS;
D O I
10.3758/s13423-017-1302-z
中图分类号
B841 [心理学研究方法];
学科分类号
040201 ;
摘要
Recent evidence has shown that practice recognizing certain objects hurts memories of objects from the same category, a phenomenon called recognition-induced forgetting. In all previous studies of this effect, the objects have been related by semantic category (e.g., instances of vases). However, the relationship between objects in many real-world visual situations stresses temporal grouping rather than semantic relations (e.g., a weapon and getaway car at a crime scene), and temporal grouping is thought to cluster items in models of long-term memory. The goal of the present study was to determine whether temporally grouped objects suffer recognition-induced forgetting. To this end, we implemented a modified recognition-induced forgetting paradigm in which the objects were temporally clustered at study. Across four experiments, we found that recognition-induced forgetting occurred only when the temporally clustered objects were also semantically related. We conclude by discussing how these findings relate to real-world vision and inform models of memory.
引用
收藏
页码:1087 / 1103
页数:17
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Recognition-induced forgetting does not occur for temporally grouped objects unless they are semantically related
    Ashleigh M. Maxcey
    Hannah Glenn
    Elisabeth Stansberry
    [J]. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2018, 25 : 1087 - 1103
  • [2] Recognition-induced forgetting of schematically related pictures
    Paul S. Scotti
    Laura Janakiefski
    Ashleigh M. Maxcey
    [J]. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2020, 27 : 357 - 365
  • [3] Recognition-induced forgetting of schematically related pictures
    Scotti, Paul S.
    Janakiefski, Laura
    Maxcey, Ashleigh M.
    [J]. PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2020, 27 (02) : 357 - 365
  • [4] Recognition-induced forgetting is caused by episodic, not semantic, memory retrieval tasks
    Maxcey, Ashleigh M.
    McCann, Molly
    Stallkamp, Samantha
    [J]. ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2020, 82 (04) : 1539 - 1547
  • [5] Recognition-induced forgetting is caused by episodic, not semantic, memory retrieval tasks
    Ashleigh M. Maxcey
    Molly McCann
    Samantha Stallkamp
    [J]. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2020, 82 : 1539 - 1547
  • [6] The Representation of Colour in Object Memory: Evidence from Recognition-Induced Forgetting
    Reppa, Irene
    Williams, Kate Elizabeth
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE EXPERIMENTALE, 2015, 69 (04): : 359 - 359
  • [7] Recognition-induced forgetting of faces in visual long-term memory
    Kelsi F. Rugo
    Kendall N. Tamler
    Geoffrey F. Woodman
    Ashleigh M. Maxcey
    [J]. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2017, 79 : 1878 - 1885
  • [8] Recognition-induced forgetting is not due to category-based set size
    Maxcey, Ashleigh M.
    [J]. ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2016, 78 (01) : 187 - 197
  • [9] Recognition-induced forgetting is not due to category-based set size
    Ashleigh M. Maxcey
    [J]. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2016, 78 : 187 - 197
  • [10] Recognition-induced forgetting of faces in visual long-term memory
    Rugo, Kelsi F.
    Tamler, Kendall N.
    Woodman, Geoffrey F.
    Maxcey, Ashleigh M.
    [J]. ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2017, 79 (07) : 1878 - 1885