Precarization or Protection? The Role of Trade and Labour Policies on Informality

被引:5
|
作者
Almeida, Rita K. [1 ,2 ]
Paz, Lourenco S. [3 ]
Poole, Jennifer P. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] World Bank, 1818 H St NW, Washington, DC 20433 USA
[2] IZA, Washington, DC USA
[3] Baylor Univ, Econ, Waco, TX 76798 USA
[4] Amer Univ, Sch Int Serv, 4400 Massachusetts Ave NW, Washington, DC 20016 USA
[5] CESifo Grp Munich, Munich, Germany
[6] IZA, Bonn, Germany
来源
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES | 2022年 / 58卷 / 07期
关键词
Brazil; enforcement; informality; trade; labour regulations; instrumental variables; ENFORCEMENT; LIBERALIZATION; ADJUSTMENT; EMPLOYMENT; COUNTRIES; MARKETS;
D O I
10.1080/00220388.2022.2061850
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Several episodes of market-oriented reforms in developing countries have been accompanied by a significant rise in work outside of the formal economy. This paper investigates whether the impact of trade on formal employment is mediated by the strength of labour regulations. We rely on data from the Brazilian Census that provides information on workers' demographics and employment, including job formality status. Our estimation strategy exploits quasi-exogenous changes in industry-level real exchange rates to explore the likelihood of informality across employers exposed to varying degrees of de facto labour regulations. We further utilize two key features of Brazilian labour institutions - budgetary decisions about the availability of resources occur at the federal level, while decisions about where to inspect occur at the local level - to instrument for labour enforcement. Our results suggest that strict labour regulations may lead to a precarization of employment, rather than offering protection for workers.
引用
收藏
页码:1416 / 1435
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条