Molecular detection and differentiation of infectious bursal disease virus

被引:0
|
作者
Wu, Ching Ching [1 ]
Rubinelli, Peter [1 ]
Lin, Tsang Long [1 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Sch Vet Med, Dept Vet Pathobiol, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
关键词
chicken; detection; differentiation; ELISA; infectious bursal disease virus; IBDV; PCR; RT-PCR; real-time RT-PCR; serotype; subtype; VN;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Vaccination of hens, with the subsequent maternal immunity imparted to chicks, is the primary means of controlling infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV). Effective vaccination depends on rapid and accurate diagnosis of the subtype present in a flock because vaccines based on the classic subtype of IBDV can fail to protect against challenge with a variant subtype. This review describes the various methods available to detect and differentiate between IBDV subtypes. Serotype I IBDV causes economically significant immunosuppressive disease in young chickens. Within scrotype 1, two subtypes, classic and variant, can be differentiated by the virus neutralization assay. Antigen capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (AGELISA) with MAbs has been successful at differentiating the very virulent IBDV phenotype (vvIBDV) from less pathogenic types. More rapid and sensitive molecular diagnostic methods based on reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for amplification of the IBDV VP2 gene have been a major focus of investigation in recent years. Conventional RT-PCR has been useful in detecting IBDV serotypes and, to a lesser extent, differentiating IBDV subtypes. One of the approaches has been the use of SspI and NgoM IV restriction enzymes, for restriction endonuclease (RE) analysis of RT-PCR products (RT-PCR-RE) and BstNI and MboI for restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis (RT-PCR-RFLP) to find unique banding patterns associated with antigenic variation within the variable region of the IBDV VP2 protein. However, these approaches were ultimately found to be unreliable because subtypes could not be consistently distinguished with restriction enzymes. These limitations led to studies in differentiating subtypes by detection of single nucleotide differences in sequence through real-time RT-PCR or DNA sequencing of RT-PCR products. Conventional RT-PCR, amplifying the VP2 hypervariable region, in combination with DNA sequencing of the PCR product, can differentiate classic, variant, and wIBDV strains because variant and vvIBDV have characteristic nucleotide and amino acid substitutions. Real-time RT-PCR, targeting different regions of the IBDV genome, including VT1, VP2, and VP4 genes, in conjunction with melting-curve analysis is being investigated as a promising tool for molecular diagnosis of IBDV infection. These methods potentially allow for more rapid, sensitive, and specific detection and differentiation of IBDV classic, very virulent, and variant subtypes.
引用
收藏
页码:515 / 526
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Conventional and Molecular Detection of Infectious Bursal Disease Virus in Broiler Chicken
    Zahid, Beenish
    Aslam, Asim
    Tipu, Yasin
    Yaqub, Tahir
    Butt, Tariq
    [J]. PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 2016, 48 (02) : 601 - 603
  • [2] Detection and molecular characterization of a new genotype of infectious bursal disease virus in Portugal
    Legnardi, Matteo
    Franzo, Giovanni
    Tucciarone, Claudia Maria
    Koutoulis, Konstantinos
    Duarte, Isabel
    Silva, Marco
    Le Tallec, Bertrand
    Cecchinato, Mattia
    [J]. AVIAN PATHOLOGY, 2022, 51 (01) : 97 - 105
  • [3] Molecular epidemiology of infectious bursal disease virus in Zambia
    Kasanga, Christopher J.
    Yamaguchi, Tsuyoshi
    Munang'andu, Hetron M.
    Ohya, Kenji
    Fukushi, Hideto
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN VETERINARY ASSOCIATION-TYDSKRIF VAN DIE SUID-AFRIKAANSE VETERINERE VERENIGING, 2013, 84 (01):
  • [4] Molecular identification of infectious bursal disease virus strains
    Jackwood, DJ
    Jackwood, RJ
    [J]. AVIAN DISEASES, 1997, 41 (01) : 97 - 104
  • [5] Immunohistochemical detection of infectious bursal disease virus antigen
    Raj, GD
    Manohar, BM
    Govindarajan, R
    Thangavelu, A
    Koteeswaran, A
    Venugopalan, AT
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 1999, 69 (01): : 36 - 38
  • [6] Detection of infectious bursal disease virus by immunoperoxidase test
    Gowri, AM
    Jayakumar, R
    Kumanan, K
    Manickam, R
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 1998, 68 (12): : 1258 - 1259
  • [7] Comparison of serological tests for detection of infectious bursal disease virus in bursal samples
    Kadam, M
    Jhala, MK
    [J]. INDIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2003, 80 (08): : 723 - 726
  • [8] MOLECULAR-DETECTION OF INFECTIOUS BURSAL DISEASE VIRUS BY POLYMERASE CHAIN-REACTION
    WU, CC
    LIN, TL
    ZHANG, HG
    DAVIS, VS
    BOYLE, JA
    [J]. AVIAN DISEASES, 1992, 36 (02) : 221 - 226
  • [10] Pathogenicity and molecular characterization of infectious bursal disease virus in China
    Lian, Jiamin
    Wang, Zhanxin
    Xu, Zhouyi
    Pang, Yanling
    Leng, Mei
    Tang, Shuang
    Zhang, Xinheng
    Qin, Jianping
    Chen, Feng
    Lin, Wencheng
    [J]. POULTRY SCIENCE, 2022, 101 (01)