Delayed changes in auditory status in cochlear implant users with preserved acoustic hearing

被引:54
|
作者
Scheperle, Rachel A. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Tejani, Viral D. [1 ,2 ]
Omtvedt, Julia K. [1 ]
Brown, Carolyn J. [1 ,2 ]
Abbas, Paul J. [1 ,2 ]
Hansen, Marlan R. [2 ]
Gantz, Bruce J. [2 ]
Oleson, Jacob J. [3 ]
Ozanne, Marie V. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Dept Commun Sci & Disorders, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[2] Univ Iowa, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[3] Univ Iowa, Dept Biostat, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[4] Montclair State Univ, Dept Commun Sci & Disorders, 1515 Broad St,Second Floor, Bloomfield, NJ 07003 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Cochlear implant; Hearing preservation; Electrode impedance; Electrically evoked compound action potential; MULTICENTER CLINICAL-TRIAL; ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION; ELECTRODE IMPEDANCE; ROUND WINDOW; INNER-EAR; FIBROSIS; OUTCOMES; INCREASES; SURGERY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.heares.2017.04.005
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
This retrospective review explores delayed-onset hearing loss in 85 individuals receiving cochlear implants designed to preserve acoustic hearing at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics between 2001 and 2015. Repeated measures of unaided behavioral audiometric thresholds, electrode impedance, and electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) amplitude growth functions were used to characterize longitudinal changes in auditory status. Participants were grouped into two primary categories according to changes in unaided behavioral thresholds: (1) stable hearing or symmetrical hearing loss and (2) delayed loss of hearing in the implanted ear. Thirty-eight percent of this sample presented with delayed-onset hearing loss of various degrees and rates of change. Neither array type nor insertion approach (round window or cochleostomy) had a significant effect on prevalence. Electrode impedance increased abruptly for many individuals exhibiting precipitous hearing loss; the increase was often transient. The impedance increases were significantly larger than the impedance changes observed for individuals with stable or symmetrical hearing loss. Moreover, the impedance changes were associated with changes in behavioral thresholds for individuals with a precipitous drop in behavioral thresholds. These findings suggest a change in the electrode environment coincident with the change in auditory status. Changes in ECAP thresholds, growth function slopes, and suprathreshold amplitudes were not correlated with changes in behavioral thresholds, suggesting that neural responsiveness in the region excited by the implant is relatively stable. Further exploration into etiology of delayed-onset hearing loss post implantation is needed, with particular interest in mechanisms associated with changes in the intracochlear environment. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 57
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The effects of changes in hearing status in cochlear implant users on the acoustic vowel space and CV coarticulation
    Lane, H
    Matthies, M
    Perkell, J
    Vick, J
    Zandipour, M
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2001, 44 (03): : 552 - 563
  • [2] Access and Polarization Electrode Impedance Changes in Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Cochlear Implant Users with Delayed Loss of Acoustic Hearing
    Viral D. Tejani
    Hyejin Yang
    Jeong-Seo Kim
    Helin Hernandez
    Jacob J. Oleson
    Marlan R. Hansen
    Bruce J. Gantz
    Paul J. Abbas
    Carolyn J. Brown
    Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 2022, 23 : 95 - 118
  • [3] Access and Polarization Electrode Impedance Changes in Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Cochlear Implant Users with Delayed Loss of Acoustic Hearing
    Tejani, Viral D.
    Yang, Hyejin
    Kim, Jeong-Seo
    Hernandez, Helin
    Oleson, Jacob J.
    Hansen, Marlan R.
    Gantz, Bruce J.
    Abbas, Paul J.
    Brown, Carolyn J.
    JARO-JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2022, 23 (01): : 95 - 118
  • [4] Acoustically Evoked Compound Action Potentials Recorded From Cochlear Implant Users With Preserved Acoustic Hearing
    Kim, Jeong-Seo
    Brown, Carolyn J.
    EAR AND HEARING, 2023, 44 (05): : 1061 - 1077
  • [5] Differences in neural encoding of speech in noise between cochlear implant users with and without preserved acoustic hearing
    Shim, Hwan
    Kim, Subong
    Hong, Jean
    Na, Youngmin
    Woo, Jihwan
    Hansen, Marlan
    Gantz, Bruce
    Choi, Inyong
    HEARING RESEARCH, 2023, 427
  • [6] Delayed loss of residual hearing in Clarion® cochlear implant users
    Barbara, M
    Mattioni, A
    Monini, S
    Chiappini, I
    Ronchetti, F
    Ballantyne, D
    Mancini, P
    Filipo, R
    JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2003, 117 (11): : 850 - 853
  • [7] Beneficial acoustic speech cues for cochlear implant users with residual acoustic hearing
    Visram, Anisa S.
    Azadpour, Mahan
    Kluk, Karolina
    McKay, Colette M.
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2012, 131 (05): : 4042 - 4050
  • [8] YOUNG COCHLEAR IMPLANT USERS RESPONSE TO DELAYED AUDITORY-FEEDBACK
    TYEMURRAY, N
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1992, 91 (06): : 3483 - 3486
  • [9] Electrocochleography in Cochlear Implant Users with Residual Acoustic Hearing: A Systematic Review
    Kim, Jeong-Seo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (19) : 1 - 13
  • [10] Auditory, Visual, and Cognitive Abilities in Normal-Hearing Adults, Hearing Aid Users, and Cochlear Implant Users
    Ceuleers, Dorien
    Keppler, Hannah
    Degeest, Sofie
    Baudonck, Nele
    Swinnen, Freya
    Kestens, Katrien
    Dhooge, Ingeborg
    EAR AND HEARING, 2024, 45 (03): : 679 - 694