The effect of the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition on breast cancer staging and prognostication

被引:11
|
作者
Savage, Paul [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yu, Nancy [3 ]
Dumitra, Sinziana [3 ,4 ]
Meterissian, Sarkis [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Rosalind & Morris Goodman Canc Res Ctr, Montreal, PQ H3G 0B1, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Div Expt Med, Montreal, PQ H4A 3J1, Canada
[3] McGill Univ, Fac Med, Montreal, PQ H4A 3T2, Canada
[4] McGill Univ, Dept Surg, Montreal, PQ H3G 1A4, Canada
[5] McGill Univ, Dept Oncol, Montreal, PQ H4A 3T2, Canada
来源
EJSO | 2019年 / 45卷 / 10期
关键词
Breast cancer; AJCC eighth edition; Stage; Prognostic staging; Anatomical staging; Prognosis; SYSTEM; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejso.2019.03.027
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: Breast cancer staging has been developed to quantify prognosis and guide treatment. The American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition manual (AJCC8) departed from traditional anatomic staging by incorporating biological factors such as grade, hormone and HER2 receptor status into a novel prognostic staging model. The aim of this study was to externally validate AJCC8 prognostic staging. Methods: This retrospective cohort investigated patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2013 at the McGill University Health Center. Patients were classified using both anatomic and prognostic staging systems according AJCC8. Overall survival analysis using a multivariate Cox-proportional hazard model was performed and model accuracy was evaluated using the Harrell concordance index (C-index) and Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). Results: The cohort included 1703 women. Anatomic and prognostic stage assignments displayed discrepancies for 46.2% of patients, where 38.8% were downstaged and 7.5% were upstaged with prognostic staging. Patients with anatomic stages IB, HA, IIB, IIIA and IIIC had high rates of downstaging (64.6-96.5%), as opposed to anatomic stages IA and IIIB where 93.1% and 75.0% of patients stage remained unchanged, respectively. The prognostic stage displayed increased prognostic accuracy with respect to overall survival, where the C-index was significantly higher compared to anatomic staging (0.810 vs 0.799, p < 0.05). In addition, prognostic staging displayed an improved model fit with a lower AIC (983.9) compared to anatomic staging (995.2). Conclusion: Prognostic and anatomic staging differ in their classification of patients, where prognostic staging displays improved accuracy, supporting its use in informing patient prognosis and guiding treatment decisions. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd, BASO - The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1817 / 1820
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] International Validation of the Eighth Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM Staging System in Patients With Resected Pancreatic Cancer
    van Roessel, Stijn
    Kasumova, Gyulnara G.
    Verheij, Joanne
    Najarian, Robert M.
    Maggino, Laura
    de Pastena, Matteo
    Malleo, Giuseppe
    Marchegiani, Giovanni
    Salvia, Roberto
    Ng, Sing Chau
    de Geus, Susanna W.
    Lof, Sanne
    Giovinazzo, Francesco
    van Dam, Jacob L.
    Kent, Tara S.
    Busch, Olivier R.
    van Eijck, Casper H.
    Koerkamp, Bas Groot
    Abu Hilal, Mohammed
    Bassi, Claudio
    Tseng, Jennifer F.
    Besselink, Marc G.
    JAMA SURGERY, 2018, 153 (12)
  • [32] The significance of tumor budding in oral cancer survival and its relevance to the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system
    Ho, Yi-Yun
    Wu, Tzu-Ying
    Cheng, Han-Chieh
    Yang, Cheng-Chieh
    Wu, Cheng-Hsien
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2019, 41 (09): : 2991 - 3001
  • [33] Revision of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for breast cancer
    Singletary, SE
    Allred, C
    Ashley, P
    Bassett, LW
    Berry, D
    Bland, KI
    Borgen, PI
    Clark, CG
    Edge, SB
    Hayes, DF
    Hughes, LL
    Hutter, RVP
    Morrow, M
    Page, DL
    Recht, A
    Theriault, RL
    Thor, A
    Weaver, DL
    Wieand, HS
    Greene, FL
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (17) : 3628 - 3636
  • [34] Pathologic Staging of Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors: What Is New in the Eighth Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual?
    Laurini, Javier A.
    Cooper, Kumarasen
    AJSP-REVIEWS AND REPORTS, 2018, 23 (03): : 149 - 156
  • [35] The eighth edition American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) melanoma staging system: implications for melanoma treatment and care
    Keung, Emily Z.
    Gershenwald, Jeffrey E.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2018, 18 (08) : 775 - 784
  • [36] Validation Study of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Eighth Edition Prognostic Stage Compared With the Anatomic Stage in Breast Cancer
    Weiss, Anna
    Chavez-MacGregor, Mariana
    Lichtensztajn, Daphne Y.
    Yi, Min
    Tadros, Audree
    Hortobagyi, Gabriel N.
    Giordano, Sharon H.
    Hunt, Kelly K.
    Mittendorf, Elizabeth A.
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2018, 4 (02) : 203 - 209
  • [37] Setting the stage: Contemporary staging of non-melanomatous skin cancer and implementation of the new American Joint Committee on cancer eighth edition staging manual
    Casswell, Georgina
    Cavanagh, Karda
    Ravi Kumar, Aravind S.
    Giddings, Charles
    McDowell, Lachlan
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 98 : 102 - 108
  • [38] Eighth Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Breast Cancer
    Armando E. Giuliano
    Stephen B. Edge
    Gabriel N. Hortobagyi
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2018, 25 : 1783 - 1785
  • [39] Eighth Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Breast Cancer
    Giuliano, Armando E.
    Edge, Stephen B.
    Hortobagyi, Gabriel N.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 25 (07) : 1783 - 1785
  • [40] Analysis of the seventh edition of American Joint Committee on colon cancer staging
    Lan, Yuan-Tzu
    Yang, Shung-Haur
    Chang, Shih-Ching
    Liang, Wen-Yih
    Li, Anna Fen-Yau
    Wang, Huann-Sheng
    Jiang, Jeng-Kai
    Chen, Wei-Shone
    Lin, Tzu-Chen
    Lin, Jen-Kou
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2012, 27 (05) : 657 - 663