Towards global relational theorizing: a dialogue between Sinophone and Anglophone scholarship on relationalism

被引：42

作者：

Nordin, Astrid H. M. ^{[1
,2
]}

Smith, Graham M. ^{[3
]}

Bunskoek, Raoul ^{[4
]}

Huang, Chiung-chiu ^{[5
]}

Hwang, Yih-jye ^{[6
]}

Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus ^{[7
]}

Kavalski, Emilian ^{[8
]}

Ling, L. H. M. ^{[9
]}

Martindale, Leigh ^{[10
]}

Nakamura, Mari ^{[11
]}

Nexon, Daniel ^{[12
,13
]}

Premack, Laura ^{[2
]}

Qin, Yaqing ^{[14
]}

Shih, Chih-yu ^{[15
]}

Tyfield, David ^{[16
]}

Williams, Emma ^{[17
]}

Zalewski, Marysia ^{[18
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Lancaster, China Ctr, Lancaster, England

[2] Univ Lancaster, Dept Polit Philosophy & Relig, Lancaster, England

[3] Univ Leeds, Polit Theory, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England

[4] Natl Taiwan Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Taipei, Taiwan

[5] Natl Chengchi Univ, Grad Inst East Asian Studies, Taipei, Taiwan

[6] Leiden Univ, Int Relat, Leiden, Netherlands

[7] Amer Univ, Int Studies, Sch Int Serv, Washington, DC 20016 USA

[8] Australian Catholic Univ, Sydney, NSW, Australia

[9] New Sch, Int Affairs, New York, NY USA

[10] Univ Lancaster, Lancaster, England

[11] Leiden Univ, Modern Japan Studies & Int Relat, Inst Area Studies, Leiden, Netherlands

[12] Georgetown Univ, Dept Govt, Washington, DC 20057 USA

[13] Georgetown Univ, Sch Foreign Serv, Washington, DC 20057 USA

[14] China Foreign Affairs Univ, Int Studies, Beijing, Peoples R China

[15] Natl Taiwan Univ, Knowledge China Studies & Int Relat, Taipei, Taiwan

[16] Univ Lancaster, Lancaster Environm Ctr, Environm Innovat & Sociol, Lancaster, England

[17] Univ Lancaster, Polit Philosophy & Relig Dept, Lancaster, England

[18] Cardiff Univ, Int Relat, Cardiff, S Glam, Wales

来源：

CAMBRIDGE REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS | 2019年 / 32卷 / 05期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1080/09557571.2019.1643978

中图分类号：

D81 [国际关系];

学科分类号：

030207 ;

摘要：

What is 'relational theorizing' in International Relations and what can it offer? This article introduces a thematic section that responds to these questions by showing two things. First, relational theorizing is not a doctrine or a method, but a set of analyses that begin with relations rather than the putative essences of constitutively autonomous actors. Second, relational theorizing has emerged from different geo-linguistic traditions, and a relational approach to International Relations (IR) can offer the language and space for increased and productive engagement beyond Anglophone scholarship. This thematic section takes a significant step in this direction by staging a dialogue between Sinophone and Anglophone scholarship on relational IR theorizing. Such an engagement shows points of comparison and contrast, convergence and divergence. In this way, the essays presented here contribute to developing a more 'global' IR.

引用

页码：570 / 581

页数：12