Eco-Efficiency Evaluation Considering Environmental Stringency

被引:14
|
作者
Lee, Pyoungsoo [1 ]
Park, You-Jin [2 ]
机构
[1] Chung Ang Univ, Korea E Trade Res Inst, Seoul 06974, South Korea
[2] Chung Ang Univ, Sch Business Adm, Coll Business & Econ, Seoul 06974, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
eco-efficiency; operational efficiency; environmental efficiency; data envelopment analysis (DEA); MODELING UNDESIRABLE FACTORS; ENVELOPMENT; PERFORMANCE; INDUSTRY; CHINA; DEA; AGRICULTURE; EXTENSION; OUTPUTS;
D O I
10.3390/su9040661
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper proposes an extended data envelopment analysis (DEA) model for deriving eco-efficiency. In order to derive eco-efficiency, the proposed model utilizes the concepts of operational efficiency and environmental efficiency. Since DEA can separately measure operational efficiency and environmental efficiency, the treatment for constructing the unified indicator is required to ultimately evaluate eco-efficiency through balancing operational and environmental concerns. To achieve this goal, we define the environmental stringency as the business condition reflecting the degree of enforcing environmental regulations across the firms or particular industries in different countries. The proposed model provides flexibility, as required by the pollution-intensity of industry, in that it allows the decision maker to evaluate DMU's (decision-making unit) eco-efficiency appropriately depending on the business environment. We present a case of agricultural production systems to help readers understand what eco-efficiency becomes when we vary the stringency conditions. Through the illustrative example, this paper presents the potential application by which different environmental stringencies can successively be incorporated in DEA.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Eco-efficiency and environmental marketing
    Riebel, P
    [J]. PULP & PAPER-CANADA, 1999, 100 (11) : 54 - 54
  • [2] ECO-EFFICIENCY INDICATORS IN THE EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE OF THERMAL POWER PLANTS
    Grigore, Roxana
    Capat, Cornelia
    Hazi, Aneta
    Hazi, Gheorghe
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2016, 15 (01): : 143 - 149
  • [3] Eco-efficiency evaluation of symbiotic network for environmental governance PPP projects
    REN Zhi-tao
    MA Jing-lu
    ZHAI Feng-xia
    WANG Lin
    LIAN Chen
    [J]. Ecological Economy, 2023, 19 (03) : 244 - 256
  • [4] Performance evaluation and eco-efficiency coefficients
    Carvalho, LN
    de Matos, ERJ
    Moraes, RO
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE CITY: URBAN REGENERATION AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2000, 9 : 193 - 202
  • [5] Evaluation of agriculture eco-efficiency in Latvia
    Gancone, Agita
    Pubule, Jelena
    Rosa, Marika
    Blumberga, Dagnija
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE - ENVIRONMENTAL AND CLIMATE TECHNOLOGIES (CONECT 2017), 2017, 128 : 309 - 315
  • [6] Eco-efficiency evaluation of the eco-industrial cluster
    Hu, Allen H.
    Shih, Sin-How
    Hsu, Chia-Wei
    [J]. FOURTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ENVIRONMENTALLY CONSCIOUS DESIGN AND INVERSE MANUFACTURING, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, : 775 - 778
  • [7] Expansion of environmental impact assessment for eco-efficiency evaluation of biocomposites for industrial application
    Korol, Jerzy
    Burchart-Korol, Dorota
    Pichlak, Magdalena
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 113 : 144 - 152
  • [8] Approaching environmental sustainability of agriculture: environmental burden, eco-efficiency or eco-effectiveness
    Czyzewski, Bazyli
    Matuszczak, Anna
    Muntean, Andreea
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS-ZEMEDELSKA EKONOMIKA, 2019, 65 (07): : 299 - 306
  • [9] Eco-efficiency considering the issue of heterogeneity among power plants
    Arabi, Behrouz
    Munisamy, Susila
    Emrouznejad, Ali
    Toloo, Mehdi
    Ghazizadeh, Mohammad Sadegh
    [J]. ENERGY, 2016, 111 : 722 - 735
  • [10] Eco-efficiency Evaluation of Modular Design Smartphones
    Hirose, Kenta
    Mishima, Nozomu
    [J]. 29TH CIRP DESIGN CONFERENCE 2019, 2019, 84 : 1054 - 1058