The factors predicting upgrading of prostate cancer by using International Society for Urological Pathology (ISUP) 2014 Gleason grading system

被引:4
|
作者
Turan, Turgay [1 ]
Gucluer, Berrin [2 ]
Efiloglu, Ozgur [1 ]
Sendogan, Furkan [1 ]
Atis, Ramazan Gokhan [1 ]
Caskurlu, Turhan [1 ]
Yildirim, Asif [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Medeniyet Univ, Dept Urol, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Istanbul Medeniyet Univ, Dept Pathol, Istanbul, Turkey
来源
关键词
Gleason score; prostate biopsy; prostate cancer; radical prostatectomy; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; RISK STRATIFICATION; TARGETED BIOPSY; SCORE; CONCORDANCE; SPECIMENS; COHORT;
D O I
10.5152/tud.2018.57946
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To investigate the factors to predict Gleason score upgrading (GSU) of patients with prostate cancer who were evaluated by using the International Society for Urological Pathology (ISUP) 2014 Gleason grading system. Material and methods: Between January 2008 and December 2015, we retrospectively investigated patients who had undergone radical prostatectomy and followed up in the uro-oncology outpatient clinic. The pathologic specimens of the patients were evaluated based on the ISUP 2014 classification system. The patients were divided into two groups with or without upgraded Gleason scores. Factors that could be effective in predicting upgrading such as age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), prostate volume, D'Amico risk classification, PSA density, cancer of the prostate risk assessment (CAPRA) scores, biopsy tumor percentage, body mass index, and clinical stage parameters were compared between both groups. Results: Of the 265 patients who could be evaluated and followed up regularly, Gleason score upgrades were observed in 110 (41.5%) patients. Advanced age (p=0.009), PSA >20 ng/mL (p=0.036), PSA density >0.35 (p=0.005), high CAPRA score (p=0.031), and high biopsy tumor percentage (p=0.009) were discovered to be correlated with Gleason score upgrade in univariate logistic regression analysis. Advanced age alone was a predictor for GSU in multivariate logistic regression analysis (p=0.002). Five-year biochemical recurrence-free survival rate was 86% in the non-GSU group and 55% in the GSU group (p<0.001). Conclusion: GSU risk should be taken into consideration in making therapeutic decisions for older patients with prostate cancer, and precautions should be taken against development of aggressive disease.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 41
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] From Gleason to International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading of prostate cancer
    Samaratunga, Hemamali
    Delahunt, Brett
    Yaxley, John
    Srigley, John R.
    Egevad, Lars
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 50 (05) : 325 - 329
  • [2] The prognostic significance of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading system for prostate cancer
    Samaratunga, Hemamali
    Delahunt, Brett
    Gianduzzo, Troy
    Coughlin, Geoff
    Duffy, David
    LeFevre, Ian
    Johannsen, Shulammite
    Egevad, Lars
    Yaxley, John
    [J]. PATHOLOGY, 2015, 47 (06) : 515 - 519
  • [3] International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grading of Prostate Cancer
    Egevad, Lars
    Delahunt, Brett
    Evans, Andrew J.
    Grignon, David J.
    Kench, James G.
    Kristiansen, Glen
    Leite, Katia R.
    Samaratunga, Hemamali
    Srigley, John R.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2016, 40 (06) : 858 - 861
  • [4] International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading of prostate cancer - An ISUP consensus on contemporary grading
    Egevad, Lars
    Delahunt, Brett
    Srigley, John R.
    Samaratunga, Hemamali
    [J]. APMIS, 2016, 124 (06) : 433 - 435
  • [5] Controversial issues in Gleason and International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) prostate cancer grading: proposed recommendations for international implementation
    Srigley, John R.
    Delahunt, Brett
    Samaratunga, Hemamali
    Billis, Athanase
    Cheng, Liang
    Clouston, David
    Evans, Andrew
    Furusato, Bungo
    Kench, James
    Leite, Katia
    MacLennan, Gregory
    Moch, Holger
    Pan, Chin-Chen
    Rioux-Leclercq, Nathalie
    Ro, Jae
    Shanks, Jonathan
    Shen, Steven
    Tsuzuki, Toyonori
    Varma, Murali
    Wheeler, Thomas
    Yaxley, John
    Egevad, Lars
    [J]. PATHOLOGY, 2019, 51 (05) : 463 - 473
  • [6] International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grading of Prostate Cancer: Author's Reply
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2016, 40 (06) : 862 - 864
  • [7] Predictive efficacy of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology Gleason grading system in initially diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer
    Sun, Guang-Xi
    Shen, Peng-Fei
    Zhang, Xing-Ming
    Gong, Jing
    Gui, Hao-Jun
    Shu, Kun-Peng
    Liu, Jiang-Dong
    Zhao, Jinge
    Yang, Yao-Jing
    Chen, Xue-Qin
    Chen, Ni
    Zeng, Hao
    [J]. ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2017, 19 (05) : 573 - 578
  • [8] The prognostic significance of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading system in patients with high-risk prostate cancer
    Liu, J.
    Zhao, J.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2018, 29
  • [9] Impact of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Modified Gleason Grading on Previously Diagnosed Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancers in Radical Prostatectomies
    Choy, Bonnie
    Pearce, Shane M.
    Anderson, Blake B.
    Paner, Gladell P.
    [J]. LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2017, 97 : 218A - 218A
  • [10] Impact of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Modified Gleason Grading on Previously Diagnosed Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancers in Radical Prostatectomies
    Choy, Bonnie
    Pearce, Shane M.
    Anderson, Blake B.
    Paner, Gladell P.
    [J]. MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2017, 30 : 218A - 218A