共 50 条
Comparison of two indinavir/ritonavir regimens in the treatment of HIV-infected individuals
被引:70
|作者:
Acosta, EP
Wu, HL
Hammer, SM
Yu, S
Kuritzkes, DR
Walawander, A
Eron, JJ
Fichtenbaum, CJ
Pettinelli, C
Neath, D
Ferguson, E
Saah, AJ
Gerber, JG
机构:
[1] Univ Alabama, Div Clin Pharmacol, Sch Med, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Chestnut Hill, MA USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Coll Phys & Surg, New York, NY USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Frontier Sci & Technol, Amherst, NY USA
[6] Univ N Carolina, Dept Med, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[7] Univ Cincinnati, Med Ctr, Cincinnati, OH 45267 USA
[8] NIAID, Div Aids, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[9] Social & Sci Syst Inc, Silver Spring, MD USA
[10] Merck & Co Inc, W Point, PA USA
[11] Univ Colorado, Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Clin Pharmacol, Denver, CO USA
关键词:
antiretroviral therapy;
pharmacokinetics;
indinavir;
ritonavir;
D O I:
10.1097/00126334-200411010-00004
中图分类号:
R392 [医学免疫学];
Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号:
100102 ;
摘要:
Background: Pharmacokinetic enhancement of protease inhibitors (PIs) with low-dose ritonavir (RTV) for salvage therapy is increasingly common. The purpose of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of indinavir (IDV)/RTV at 800/200 mg (arm A) and 400/400 mg (arm B) administered twice daily in HIV-infected subjects failing their first PI-based regimen. Methods: A phase I/II, randomized, open-label, 24-week study was conducted. Formal 12-hour pharmacokinetic evaluations were performed, and study visits occurred at baseline; at weeks 1, 2, and 4; and every 4 week thereafter for 24 weeks. Clinical symptoms and laboratory assessments were collected. Subjects were allowed to switch arms because of toxicity. Results: Forty-four subjects were enrolled (22 per arm). IDV predose concentration, maximum plasma concentration and area under the curve were significantly higher in arm A. Fifty-five percent and 45% of subjects in arms A and B responded (<200 copies/mL at week 24; P = 0.76), respectively. CD4 cell responses were similar. All subjects had IDV-sensitive virus at baseline and at virologic failure. Tolerability was comparable, but all grade 3 or higher triglyceride increases occurred in arm B and more subjects in arm B switched because of toxicity (5 vs. 1 triglyceride increases). Conclusions: This is the largest formal pharmacokinetic evaluation of 2 dosage combinations of IDV/RTV in HIV-infected individuals. Pharmacokinetic parameters were consistent with previous results in patients but lower than in seronegative controls. Both regimens exhibited similar tolerability and response rates. High toxicity with a low response suggests that the optimum IDV/RTV combination would include an RTV dose <400 mg and an IDV dose <800 mg in this population.
引用
收藏
页码:1358 / 1366
页数:9
相关论文