Camera model selection based on geometric AIC

被引:0
|
作者
Kinoshita, K [1 ]
Lindenbaum, M [1 ]
机构
[1] ATR, Human Informat Proc Res Labs, Kyoto 6190288, Japan
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The problem of selecting a camera model is addressed here using the Geometric AIC (Akaike Information Criterion) proposed by Kanatani, which considers both the residual of the data fitting to the model as well as the complexity of the model. Camera models describe the geometrical relation between the SD location of object points and the image location of their projections. The most commonly used camera models ale the projective/perspective camera model and the affine camera model. Intuitively, the projective camera model, which is nonlinear and is characterized by more parameters, models the imaging geometry better, but also, is believed to lead to numerically less stable solutions. The affine camera model, which Is an approximation to the projective camera model with less parameters, is recommended to be used when the object depth is much smaller than the object distance. However, there a's no quantitative criterion for the decision: which camera model should be used, projective or affine? In this paper, the Geometric AIC criterion is used for deciding between the two camel cl models it-a the contest of two tasks: estimating the projection matrix from SD and cor responding PD data, and estimating the fundamental matrix from two sets of 2D data. It is found that in most cases, it is the projective camera model which is more appropriate. Still, in the cases where the affine camera model is traditionally used, the measures of appl appropriateness of the two models are roughly the same (with a! small advantage to the affine camera model).
引用
收藏
页码:514 / 519
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A GEL-based AIC for model selection
    Feng, Qiang
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2012, 116 (03) : 637 - 639
  • [2] Camera motion estimation by geometric AIC for factorization with missing data
    Ikeuchi, Ryosuke
    Sugaya, Yasuyuki
    [J]. 2013 SECOND IAPR ASIAN CONFERENCE ON PATTERN RECOGNITION (ACPR 2013), 2013, : 241 - 245
  • [3] Uncertainty Based Camera Model Selection
    Polic, Michal
    Steidl, Stanislav
    Albl, Cenek
    Kukelova, Zuzana
    Pajdla, Tomas
    [J]. 2020 IEEE/CVF CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION (CVPR), 2020, : 5990 - 5999
  • [4] Research on reliability model selection of computer network equipment based on AIC
    Sun, Jin
    Meng, Li
    Hou, Wei
    Yang, Hongjian
    Weng, Xingzhuo
    Xu, Jilin
    [J]. 2022 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER VISION AND MACHINE LEARNING (ICICML), 2022, : 225 - 228
  • [5] AIC model selection using Akaike weights
    Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
    Simon Farrell
    [J]. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2004, 11 : 192 - 196
  • [6] AIC model selection using Akaike weights
    Wagenmakers, EJ
    Farrell, S
    [J]. PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2004, 11 (01) : 192 - 196
  • [7] Model selection for ecologists: the worldviews of AIC and BIC
    Aho, Ken
    Derryberry, DeWayne
    Peterson, Teri
    [J]. ECOLOGY, 2014, 95 (03) : 631 - 636
  • [8] On model selection for an urban area, by the AIC criterion
    Oprisescu, Serban
    Dumitrescu, Monica
    Buzuloiu, Vasile
    [J]. ISSCS 2007: INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SIGNALS, CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2007, : 553 - +
  • [9] Change-point model selection via AIC
    Ninomiya, Yoshiyuki
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE INSTITUTE OF STATISTICAL MATHEMATICS, 2015, 67 (05) : 943 - 961
  • [10] Multimodel inference - understanding AIC and BIC in model selection
    Burnham, KP
    Anderson, DR
    [J]. SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 2004, 33 (02) : 261 - 304