Diagnostic accuracy and inter-reader reliability of the MRI Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (version 2018) risk stratification and management system

被引:1
|
作者
Singh, Ranjit [1 ]
Wilson, Mitchell P. [1 ]
Manolea, Florin [1 ]
Ahmed, Bilal [1 ]
Fung, Christopher [1 ]
Receveur, Darryn [1 ]
Low, Gavin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Radiol & Diagnost Imaging, Edmonton, AB, Canada
来源
SA JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY | 2022年 / 26卷 / 01期
关键词
liver; cirrhosis; hepatocellular carcinoma; magnetic resonance imaging; reliability; neoplasm; LI-RADS; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; CATEGORIZATION; FEATURES;
D O I
10.4102/sajr.v26i1.2386
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can be diagnosed non-invasively, provided certain imaging criteria are met. However, the recent Liver imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) version 2018 has not been widely validated. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and reader reliability of the LI-RADS version 2018 lexicon amongst fellowship trained radiologists compared with an expert consensus reference standard. Method: This retrospective study was conducted between 2018 and 2020. A total of 50 contrast enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies evaluating focal liver observations in patients with cirrhosis, hepatitis B virus (HBV) or prior HCC were acquired. The standard of reference was a consensus review by three fellowship-trained radiologists. Diagnostic accuracy including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive values (NPV) and area under the curve (AUC) values were calculated per LI-RADS category for each reader. Kappa statistics were used to measure reader agreement. Results: Readers demonstrated excellent specificities (88% -100%) and NPVs (85% - 100%) across all LI-RADS categories. Sensitivities were variable, ranging from 67% to 83% for LI-RADS 1, 29% to 43% for LI-RADS 2, 100% for LI-RADS 3, 70% to 80% for LI-RADS 4 and 80% to 84% for LI-RADS 5. Readers showed excellent accuracy for differentiating benign and malignant liver lesions with AUC values > 0.90. Overall inter-reader agreement was 'good' (kappa = 0.76, p < 0.001). Pairwise inter-reader agreement was 'very good' (kappa >= 0.90, p < 0.001). Conclusion: The LI-RADS version 2018 demonstrates excellent specificity NPV and AUC values for risk stratification of liver observations by radiologists. Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System can reliably differentiate benign from malignant lesions when used in conjunction with corresponding LI-RADS management recommendations.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Inter-reader reliability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System: a meta-analysis
    Ji Hun Kang
    Sang Hyun Choi
    Ji Sung Lee
    Dong Wook Kim
    Jong Keon Jang
    [J]. Abdominal Radiology, 2021, 46 : 4671 - 4681
  • [2] Inter-reader reliability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System: a meta-analysis
    Kang, Ji Hun
    Choi, Sang Hyun
    Lee, Ji Sung
    Kim, Dong Wook
    Jang, Jong Keon
    [J]. ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 46 (10) : 4671 - 4681
  • [3] Diagnostic performance and inter-reader reliability of bone reporting and data system (Bone-RADS) on computed tomography
    Park, Chankue
    Azhideh, Arash
    Pooyan, Atefe
    Alipour, Ehsan
    Haseli, Sara
    Satwah, Ishan
    Chalian, Majid
    [J]. SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2024,
  • [4] Inter-reader reliability of CT Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System according to imaging analysis methodology: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ji Hun Kang
    Sang Hyun Choi
    Ji Sung Lee
    Kyung Won Kim
    So Yeon Kim
    Seung Soo Lee
    Jae Ho Byun
    [J]. European Radiology, 2021, 31 : 6856 - 6867
  • [5] Inter-reader reliability of CT Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System according to imaging analysis methodology: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kang, Ji Hun
    Choi, Sang Hyun
    Lee, Ji Sung
    Kim, Kyung Won
    Kim, So Yeon
    Lee, Seung Soo
    Byun, Jae Ho
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2021, 31 (09) : 6856 - 6867
  • [6] Ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (US LI-RADS) Visualization Score: a reliability analysis on inter-reader agreement
    Tiyarattanachai, Thodsawit
    Bird, Kristen N.
    Lo, Edward C.
    Mariano, Aladin T.
    Ho, Amanzo A.
    Ferguson, Craig W.
    Chima, Ranjit S.
    Desser, Terry S.
    Morimoto, Linda Nayeli
    Kamaya, Aya
    [J]. ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 46 (11) : 5134 - 5141
  • [7] Ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (US LI-RADS) Visualization Score: a reliability analysis on inter-reader agreement
    Thodsawit Tiyarattanachai
    Kristen N. Bird
    Edward C. Lo
    Aladin T. Mariano
    Amanzo A. Ho
    Craig W. Ferguson
    Ranjit S. Chima
    Terry S. Desser
    Linda Nayeli Morimoto
    Aya Kamaya
    [J]. Abdominal Radiology, 2021, 46 : 5134 - 5141
  • [8] Correction to: Inter-reader reliability of CT Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System according to imaging analysis methodology: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ji Hun Kang
    Sang Hyun Choi
    Ji Sung Lee
    Kyung Won Kim
    So Yeon Kim
    Seung Soo Lee
    Jae Ho Byun
    [J]. European Radiology, 2021, 31 : 8820 - 8821
  • [9] Evaluating Diagnostic Accuracy and Inter-reader Agreement of the Prostate Imaging After Focal Ablation Scoring System
    Gelikman, David G.
    Kenigsberg, Alexander P.
    Law, Yan Mee
    Yilmaz, Enis C.
    Harmon, Stephanie A.
    Parikh, Sahil H.
    Hyman, Jason A.
    Huth, Hannah
    Koller, Christopher R.
    Nethala, Daniel
    Hesswani, Charles
    Merino, Maria J.
    Gurram, Sandeep
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Pinto, Peter A.
    Turkbey, Baris
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2024, 62 : 74 - 80
  • [10] Effect of training on resident inter-reader agreement with American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System
    Du, Yang
    Bara, Meredith
    Katlariwala, Prayash
    Croutze, Roger
    Resch, Katrin
    Porter, Jonathan
    Sam, Medica
    Wilson, Mitchell P.
    Low, Gavin
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 14 (01): : 19 - 29