Comparison of Lobectomy and Sublobar Resection for Stage IA Elderly NSCLC Patients (≥70 Years): A Population-Based Propensity Score Matching's Study

被引:15
|
作者
Zhang, Bo [1 ]
Liu, Renwang [1 ]
Ren, Dian [1 ]
Li, Xiongfei [1 ]
Wang, Yanye [1 ]
Huo, Huandong [1 ]
Zhu, Shuai [1 ]
Chen, Jun [1 ,2 ]
Song, Zuoqing [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Song [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Med Univ, Lung Canc Inst, Dept Lung Canc Surg, Gen Hosp, Tianjin, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Med Univ, Lung Canc Inst, Tianjin Key Lab Lung Canc Metastasis & Tumour Mic, Gen Hosp, Tianjin, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2021年 / 11卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
NSCLC; sub-lobar resection; lobectomy; propensity score matching; SEER; CELL LUNG-CANCER;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2021.610638
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background To investigate the differences in survival between lobectomy and sub-lobar resection for elderly stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry. Method The data of stage IA elderly NSCLC patients (>= 70 years) with tumors less than or equal to 3 cm in diameter were extracted. Propensity-matched analysis was used. Lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) was compared among the patients after lobectomy and sub-lobar resection. The proportional hazards model was applied to identify multiple prognostic factors. Results A total of 3,504 patients met criteria after propensity score matching (PSM). Although the LCSS was better for lobectomy than for sub-lobar resection in patients with tumors <= 3 cm before PSM (p < 0.001), no significant difference in the LCSS was identified between the two treatment groups after PSM (p = 0.191). Multivariate Cox regression showed the elder age, male gender, squamous cell carcinoma (SQC) histology type, poor/undifferentiated grade and a large tumor size were associated with poor LCSS. The subgroup analysis of tumor sizes, histologic types and lymph nodes (LNs) dissection, there were also no significant difference for LCSS between lobectomy and sub-lobar resection. The sub-lobar resection was further divided into segmentectomy or wedge resection, and it demonstrated that no significant differences in LCSS were identified among the treatment subgroups either. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that the elder age, poor/undifferentiated grade and a large tumor size were a statistically significant independent factor associated with survival. Conclusion In terms of LCSS, lobectomy has no significant advantage over sub-lobar resection in elderly patients with stage IA NSCLC if lymph node assessment is performed adequately. The present data may contribute to develop a more suitable surgical treatment strategy for the stage IA elderly NSCLC patients.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of lobectomy and sublobar resection for stage IA elderly NSCLC patients (≥70 years): A population-based propensity score matching study
    Zhang, B.
    Liu, W. R.
    Ren, D.
    Li, F. X.
    Wang, Y. Y.
    Huo, D. H.
    Zhu, S.
    Chen, J.
    Song, Q. Z.
    Xu, S.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2021, 16 (04) : S729 - S729
  • [2] A Propensity Score-Weighted Analysis for SBRT, Lobectomy and Sublobar Resection in Elderly Patients with cStage I NSCLC
    Kishi, N.
    Matsuo, Y.
    Menju, T.
    Hamaji, M.
    Nakakura, A.
    Hanazawa, H.
    Takehana, K.
    Date, H.
    Mizowaki, T.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2021, 16 (03) : S271 - S271
  • [3] Comparison of surgical resection and radiofrequency ablation for stages I and II elderly hepatocellular carcinoma patients (≥ 65 years): A SEER population-based propensity score matching's study
    Xie, Qingqing
    Yang, Yongwen
    Qu, Bin
    Xiao, Ping
    Tang, Faqing
    Shen, Haoming
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [4] Sublobar resection versus lobectomy for patients with stage T1-2N0M0 pulmonary typical carcinoid tumours: a population-based propensity score matching analysis
    Yang, Hao
    Mei, Tonghua
    INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2022, 35 (03)
  • [5] Prognosis analysis of lobectomy and sublobar resection in patients ≥75 years old with pathological stage I invasive lung adenocarcinoma of ≤3 cm: a propensity score matching-based analysis
    Chen, Chunji
    Ni, Qiming
    Shi, Yubo
    Fu, Shijie
    Pan, Xufeng
    Wang, Yiyang
    Yang, Jun
    Wang, Rui
    TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 8 (02) : 574 - 582
  • [6] Survival After Lobectomy vs. Sublobar Resection for Stage IA Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Lung: A Population-Based Study
    Yu, Xiangyang
    Zhang, Mengqi
    Wang, Feifei
    Guo, Xiaotong
    Ma, Kai
    Wang, Lixu
    Zhao, Hongbo
    Xiao, Hua
    Huang, Chujian
    Du, Longde
    Jia, Ran
    Yang, Yikun
    Zhang, Lanjun
    Yu, Zhentao
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2022, 9
  • [7] Lobectomy versus sublobar resection for stage I (T1-T2aN0M0) small cell lung cancer: A SEER population-based propensity score matching analysis
    Zhou, Ning
    Yang, Lingqi
    Zhang, Bo
    Zhu, Shuai
    Huo, Huandong
    He, Jinling
    Zu, Lingling
    Song, Zuoqing
    Xu, Song
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (07): : 7923 - 7931
  • [8] Comparison of survival outcomes between sublobar resection and lobectomies in early-stage lung adenocarcinoma by propensity score matching analysis
    Eunjue Yi
    Sukki Cho
    Kwhanmien Kim
    Sanghoon Jheon
    Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2020, 36 : 382 - 387
  • [9] Comparison of survival outcomes between sublobar resection and lobectomies in early-stage lung adenocarcinoma by propensity score matching analysis
    Yi, Eunjue
    Cho, Sukki
    Kim, Kwhanmien
    Jheon, Sanghoon
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 36 (04) : 382 - 387
  • [10] Comparison of prognostic impact of lymphovascular invasion in stage IA non-small cell lung cancer after lobectomy versus sublobar resection: A propensity score-matched analysis
    Yun, Jae Kwang
    Lee, Geun Dong
    Choi, Sehoon
    Kim, Hyeong Ryul
    Kim, Yong-Hee
    Kim, Dong Kwan
    Park, Seung-Il
    LUNG CANCER, 2020, 146 : 105 - 111