Autologous Bone Is Inferior to Alloplastic Cranioplasties: Safety of Autograft and Allograft Materials for Cranioplasties, a Systematic Review

被引:111
|
作者
van de Vijfeijken, Sophie E. C. M. [1 ]
Munker, Tijmen J. A. G. [2 ]
Spijker, Rene [3 ]
Karssemakers, Luc H. E. [1 ]
Vandertop, William P. [4 ]
Becking, Alfred G. [1 ]
Ubbink, Dirk T. [5 ]
机构
[1] Acad Med Ctr, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Acad Ctr Dent Amsterdam ACTA, Dept Dent Mat Sci, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Acad Med Ctr, Med Lib, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Acad Med Ctr, Neurosurg Ctr Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Acad Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Acrylic; Allograft; Cranioplasty; Decompressive craniectomy; PEEK; Titanium; CALCIUM-PHOSPHATE CEMENT; TRAUMATIC BRAIN-INJURY; TERM-FOLLOW-UP; COMPLICATIONS FOLLOWING CRANIOPLASTY; METHYL-METHACRYLATE CRANIOPLASTY; CEREBROSPINAL-FLUID LEAKS; PATIENT-SPECIFIC IMPLANTS; GROWING SKULL FRACTURE; POLYETHER ETHER KETONE; COMPUTER-AIDED-DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.wneu.2018.05.193
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Currently, various materials are routinely used for cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy, each with their own features, potential benefits, and harms. OBJECTIVES: To systematically review available literature about safety (infection, resorption, and removal) of different materials used for cranioplasty for any indication. METHODS: A comprehensive search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library was performed for relevant studies published up to January 2017. Study quality was assessed according to the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias assessment tool, and a set of 27 predetermined parameters was extracted by 2 investigators independently for further analysis. RESULTS: The search yielded 2 randomized, 14 prospective, and 212 retrospective studies, totaling 10,346 cranioplasties in which 1952 (18.9%) complications were reported in patients between 0 and 90 years old. Overall, study quality was low and heterogeneity was large. Graft infections and resorption were most prevalent: overall infection rate was 5.6%. Autologous cranioplasties showed an infection rate of 6.9% versus 5.0% in combined alloplastic materials, including poly(methyl methacrylate) with 7.8%. Resorption occurred almost exclusively in autologous cranioplasties (11.3%). The greatest removal rate was reported for autologous cranioplasties (overall: 10.4%), which was significantly greater than that of combined alloplastic materials (overall: 5.1%; risk difference [0.052 [95% confidence interval: 0.039-0.066]; NNT = 19 [95% confidence interval: 15-25]). CONCLUSIONS: Available evidence on the safety of cranioplasty materials is limited due to a large diversity in study conduct, patients included, and outcomes reported. Autografts appear to carry a greater failure risk than allografts. Future publications concerning cranioplasties will benefit by a standardized reporting of surgical procedures, outcomes, and graft materials used.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / +
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Synthetic bone graft versus autograft or allograft for spinal fusion: a systematic review
    Buser, Zorica
    Brodke, Darrel S.
    Youssef, Jim A.
    Meisel, Hans-Joerg
    Myhre, Sue Lynn
    Hashimoto, Robin
    Park, Jong-Beom
    Yoon, S. Tim
    Wang, Jeffrey C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2016, 25 (04) : 509 - 516
  • [2] Histological comparision of an allograft, a xenograft and alloplastic graft as bone substitute materials
    Nappe, C. E.
    Rezuc, A. B.
    Montecinos, A.
    Donoso, F. A.
    Vergara, A. J.
    Martinez, B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OSSEOINTEGRATION, 2016, 8 (02) : 20 - 26
  • [3] A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparison between autologous costal cartilage and alloplastic materials in rhinoplasty
    Liang, Xuebing
    Wang, Keming
    Malay, Sunitha
    Chung, Kevin C.
    Ma, Jiguang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2018, 71 (08): : 1164 - 1173
  • [4] Allograft and alloplastic bone substitutes: A review of science and technology for the craniomaxillofacial surgeon
    Eppley, BL
    Pietrzak, WS
    Blanton, MW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2005, 16 (06) : 981 - 989
  • [5] Autograft versus Allograft for Cervical Spinal Fusion: A Systematic Review
    Tuchman, Alexander
    Brodke, Darrel S.
    Youssef, Jim A.
    Meisel, Hans-Joerg
    Dettori, Joseph R.
    Park, Jong-Beom
    Yoon, S. Tim
    Wang, Jeffrey C.
    [J]. GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2017, 7 (01) : 59 - 70
  • [6] Iliac Crest Bone Graft versus Local Autograft or Allograft for Lumbar Spinal Fusion: A Systematic Review
    Tuchman, Alexander
    Brodke, Darrel S.
    Youssef, Jim A.
    Meisel, Hans-Joerg
    Dettori, Joseph R.
    Park, Jong-Beom
    Yoon, S. Tim
    Wang, Jeffrey C.
    [J]. GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2016, 6 (06) : 592 - 606
  • [7] A Systematic Review of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Autograft Compared with Allograft
    Carey, James L.
    Dunn, Warren R.
    Dahm, Diane L.
    Zeger, Scott L.
    Spindler, Kurt P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2009, 91A (09): : 2242 - 2250
  • [8] Medial Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With Autograft Versus Allograft: A Systematic Review
    Blackwood, Nigel O.
    Blitz, Jack A.
    Vopat, Bryan
    Ierulli, Victoria K.
    Mulcahey, Mary K.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2024,
  • [9] Autograft Versus Allograft for Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
    Aliberti, Gianna M.
    Kraeutler, Matthew J.
    Miskimin, Cadence
    Scillia, Anthony J.
    Belk, John W.
    Mulcahey, Mary K.
    [J]. ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2021, 9 (10)
  • [10] Autologous Versus Alloplastic Reconstruction for Patients with Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Rawan ElAbd
    Neetin Prabhu
    Alaa Alibrahim
    Emily Burke
    Jason Williams
    Osama Samargandi
    [J]. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2022, 46 : 597 - 609