A cost-effective framework to prioritise stakeholder participation options

被引:5
|
作者
Liu, Shuang [1 ,2 ]
Maclean, Kirsten [2 ,3 ]
Robinson, Cathy [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO Land & Water, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
[2] Plant Biosecur Cooperat Res Ctr, GPO Box 5012, Bruce, ACT 2617, Australia
[3] CSIRO Land & Water, GPO Box 2583, Brisbane, Qld 4102, Australia
关键词
Return on investment; Stakeholder engagement; Plant biosecurity; Multi-criteria analysis (MCA); Public participation; Decision conferencing; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL-MANAGEMENT; BANANA; BIOSECURITY; CONFLICTS; DISEASE; VALUES; CONSTRUCTION; PERCEPTIONS; OBJECTIVES;
D O I
10.1007/s40070-019-00103-7
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Stakeholder participation is increasingly being embedded into decision-making processes from the local to the global scale. With limited resources to engage stakeholders, frameworks that allow decision-makers to make cost-effective choices are greatly needed. In this paper, we present a structured decision-making (SDM) framework that enables environmental decision-makers to prioritise different engagement options by assessing their relative cost-effectiveness. We demonstrate the application of this framework using a case study in biosecurity management. Drawing on a scenario of Panama Disease Tropical Race 4 (TR4) invasion in the Australian banana industry, we conducted 25 semi-structured interviews and held a workshop with key stakeholders to elicit their key concerns and convert them into four objectives-making more informed decisions, maximising buy-in, empowering people, and minimising the stress of biosecurity incidents. We also identified ten engagement alternatives at local, State/Territory, and National scales. Our results showed that options to engage local stakeholders and enable capacity to undertake adaptive approaches to biosecurity management are more cost-effective than engagement efforts that seek to build capacities at higher decision-making levels. More interestingly, using the weights provided by different stakeholder groups does not significantly affect the cost-effectiveness ranking of the ten options considered. Even though the results are contingent on the context of this biosecurity study, the SDM framework developed for maximising cost-effectiveness is transferable to other areas of environmental management. The efficient frontier generated by this framework allows decision-makers to examine the trade-offs between the costs and benefits and select the best portfolio for their investment. This approach provides a practical and transparent estimate of the return on investment for stakeholder engagement in highly complex or uncertain situations, as is usually the case for environmental issues.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 241
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cost-effective and Sustainable Sanitation Options
    Guimet, V.
    Fournier, V.
    Le Goas, H.
    Arnaud, P.
    Audic, J. M.
    Vuathier, J.
    [J]. WATER PRACTICE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 5 (04):
  • [2] Nanostamps offer cost-effective nanoscale surface options
    Lazikov, Dmitri
    [J]. LASER FOCUS WORLD, 2012, 48 (11): : 12 - 12
  • [3] Back Pain Cost-Effective Treatment Options needed
    Lichert, Frank
    [J]. GESUNDHEITSOEKONOMIE UND QUALITAETSMANAGEMENT, 2014, 19 (04): : 155 - 155
  • [4] COST-EFFECTIVE PARTICIPATION IN A BIBLIOGRAPHIC UTILITY BY A SMALL LIBRARY
    CHENUCAMPBELL, C
    AXTMANN, MM
    PAUL, J
    WALTERS, R
    [J]. LAW LIBRARY JOURNAL, 1980, 73 (04): : 908 - 928
  • [5] A Cost-Effective Framework for Preference Elicitation and Aggregation
    Zhao, Zhibing
    Li, Haoming
    Wang, Junming
    Kephart, Jeffrey O.
    Mattei, Nicholas
    Su, Hui
    Xia, Lirong
    [J]. UNCERTAINTY IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2018, : 446 - 456
  • [6] A Framework For Cost-Effective Scheduling of MapReduce Applications
    Zacheilas, Nikos
    Kalogeraki, Vana
    [J]. 2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTONOMIC COMPUTING, 2015, : 147 - 148
  • [7] A flexible framework for cost-effective fire management
    Clarke, Hamish
    Cirulis, Brett
    Borchers-Arriagada, Nicolas
    Storey, Michael
    Ooi, Mark
    Haynes, Katharine
    Bradstock, Ross
    Price, Owen
    Penman, Trent
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2023, 82
  • [8] Cost-Effective Learning for Cost-Effective Care?
    Walsh, Kieran
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2011, 86 (12) : 1485 - 1486
  • [9] OPTIMIZED PRESSURE SWITCHES - COST-EFFECTIVE MONITORING AND CONTROL OPTIONS
    SMITH, D
    [J]. I&CS-INSTRUMENTATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS, 1995, 68 (11): : 47 - 50
  • [10] Options for Cost-effective Capacity Upgrades in Backbone Optical Networks
    Shariati, Behnam
    Rivas-Moscoso, Jose M.
    Klonidis, Dimitrios
    Tomkos, Ioannis
    Marom, Dan M.
    Ben-Ezra, Shalva
    Sayyad Khodashenas, Pouria
    Jimenez, Felipe
    Comellas, Jaume
    Velasco, Luis
    [J]. 2016 21ST EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON NETWORKS AND OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS (NOC), 2016,