Determination of Gleason score discrepancy for risk stratification in magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy

被引:2
|
作者
Kim, See Hyung [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyungpook Natl Univ, Kyungpook Natl Univ Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Daegu, South Korea
关键词
Prostate cancer; magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion biopsy; Gleason score; MULTI-PARAMETRIC MRI; GUIDED BIOPSY; CANCER DETECTION; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1177/0284185119891695
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-ultrasound (US) fusion biopsy remains challenging and highlights the need towards standardization. Purpose To characterize the clinical and MRI features of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) with discrepant Gleason score (GS) in MRI-US fusion biopsy. Material and Methods A total of 400 consecutive patients with suspected cancer lesions who underwent MRI-US fusion biopsy and subsequent prostatectomy were included. In the comparison of biopsy GS with pathology GS, matched lesions were defined as a GS, and discrepant lesions were defined as an upgrade of the GS. Descriptive statistics were used to define clinical characteristics, including age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), PSA density, and maximal cancer core length (MCCL). Differences between lesions with matched and discrepant GS were determined considering the location and PI-RADS v2 score. A paired comparison of the volumes between the two groups was performed. Results There were 130 lesions with discrepant GS in 124 patients. There was no significant difference in the age, PSA, and PSA density between the two groups, except for the MCCL (P = 0.028). The lesions were distributed in the peripheral (n = 88) and transition (n = 42) zones; 33, 50, and 47 lesions were at the apex, mid-gland, and base levels, respectively. PI-RADS scores were as follows: 2 (n = 5), 3 (n = 8), 4 (n = 68), and 5 (n = 39). In comparison with matched lesions, discrepant lesions had significantly smaller multiparametric MRI-measured cancer volumes (P < 0.05). Conclusion Knowledge of discrepant GS in MRI-US fusion biopsy is important, and a careful approach is needed to reduce this discrepancy.
引用
收藏
页码:1134 / 1142
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer
    Tyson, Mark D.
    Arora, Sandeep S.
    Scarpato, Kristen R.
    Barocas, Daniel
    [J]. UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2016, 34 (07) : 326 - 332
  • [2] Prostate cancer detection with magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion biopsy: The role of systematic and targeted biopsies
    Filson, Christopher P.
    Natarajan, Shyam
    Margolis, Daniel J. A.
    Huang, Jiaoti
    Lieu, Patricia
    Dorey, Frederick J.
    Reiter, Robert E.
    Marks, Leonard S.
    [J]. CANCER, 2016, 122 (06) : 884 - 892
  • [3] Cognitive Versus Magnetic Resonance-Ultrasound Fusion Prostate Biopsy: Which One Is Worthier to Perform?
    Turkay, Rustu
    Inci, Ercan
    Yildiz, Omer
    Ozgur, Eren
    Tasci, Ali Ihsan
    [J]. ULTRASOUND QUARTERLY, 2020, 36 (04) : 345 - 349
  • [4] Multiparametric-Magnetic Resonance/Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy Improves Agreement Between Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Gleason Score
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    De Luca, Stefano
    Passera, Roberto
    Manfredi, Matteo
    Mele, Fabrizio
    Bollito, Enrico
    De Pascale, Agostino
    Cossu, Marco
    Aimar, Roberta
    Veltri, Andrea
    [J]. ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 36 (09) : 4833 - 4839
  • [5] Targeted Prostate Biopsy Gleason Score Heterogeneity and Implications for Risk Stratification
    Mesko, Shane
    Marks, Leonard
    Ragab, Omar
    Patel, Shyamal
    Margolis, Daniel A.
    Demanes, D. Jeffrey
    Kamrava, Mitchell
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2018, 41 (05): : 497 - 501
  • [6] Re: Prostate Cancer Detection with Magnetic Resonance-ultrasound Fusion Biopsy: The Role of Systematic and Targeted Biopsies
    Mortezavi, Ashkan
    Eberli, Daniel
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 70 (05) : 891 - 892
  • [7] HOW MUCH ARE PATIENTS WILLING TO PAY FOR MAGNETIC RESONANCE-ULTRASOUND FUSION BIOPSY?
    Ellimoottil, Chad
    Marcotte, Marissa
    Grace, Dan
    Krasnikov, Alexander
    Phillips, Joan
    Quek, Marcus
    Flanigan, Robert
    Gupta, Gopal
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04): : E623 - E623
  • [8] Prostate cancer risk stratification using magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion vs systematic prostate biopsy
    Khajir, Ghazal
    Press, Benjamin
    Lokeshwar, Soum
    Ghabili, Kamyar
    Rahman, Syed
    Gardezi, Mursal
    Washington, Samuel
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Sprenkle, Preston
    Leapman, Michael S.
    [J]. JNCI CANCER SPECTRUM, 2023, 7 (06)
  • [9] Value of Targeted Prostate Biopsy Using Magnetic Resonance-Ultrasound Fusion in Men with Prior Negative Biopsy and Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen
    Sonn, Geoffrey A.
    Chang, Edward
    Natarajan, Shyam
    Margolis, Daniel J.
    Macairan, Malu
    Lieu, Patricia
    Huang, Jiaoti
    Dorey, Frederick J.
    Reiter, Robert E.
    Marks, Leonard S.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2014, 65 (04) : 809 - 815
  • [10] Can Magnetic Resonance-Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy Improve Cancer Detection in Enlarged Prostates?
    Diaz, Annerleim Walton
    Hoang, Anthony N.
    Turkbey, Baris
    Hong, Cheng William
    Hong Truong
    Sterling, Todd
    Rais-Bahrami, Soroush
    Siddiqui, M. Minhaj
    Stamatakis, Lambros
    Vourganti, Srinivas
    Nix, Jeffrey
    Logan, Jennifer
    Harris, Colette
    Weintraub, Michael
    Chua, Celene
    Merino, Maria J.
    Choyke, Peter
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Pinto, Peter A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 190 (06): : 2020 - 2025