Understanding Vulnerable Plaques: Current Status and Future Directions

被引:24
|
作者
Lee, Kwan Yong [1 ,2 ]
Chang, Kiyuk [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Korea, Incheon St Marys Hosp, Coll Med, Cardiovasc Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Catholic Univ Korea, Incheon St Marys Hosp, Coll Med, Div Cardiol, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Catholic Univ Korea, Seoul St Marys Hosp, Coll Med, Cardiovasc Ctr, 222 Banpo Daero, Seoul 06591, South Korea
[4] Catholic Univ Korea, Seoul St Marys Hosp, Coll Med, Div Cardiol, 222 Banpo Daero, Seoul 06591, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Atherosclerotic plaque; Fibroatheroma; Coronary atherosclerosis; Microcalcification; ENDOTHELIAL SHEAR-STRESS; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; THIN-CAP FIBROATHEROMA; INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND; CORONARY ATHEROSCLEROSIS; MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; CULPRIT PLAQUE; HIGH-RISK; CALCIFICATION; RUPTURE;
D O I
10.4070/kcj.2019.0211
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The main cause of acute myocardial infarction is plaque rupture accompanied by superimposed coronary thrombosis. Thin-cap fibroatheromas (TCFAs) have been suggested as a type of lesion with a vulnerability that can cause plaque rupture. However, not only the existence of a TCFA but also the fine and complex interactions of other anatomical and hemodynamic factors, such as microcalcification in the fibrous cap, cholesterol crystal-induced inflammasome activation, the apoptosis of intraplaque macrophages, and endothelial shear stress distribution should precede a clinical event caused by plaque rupture. Recent studies are being conducted to identify these mechanisms through molecular imaging and hemodynamic assessment using computational fluid dynamics, which will result in better clinical results through selective coronary interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:1115 / 1122
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Current understanding and future directions
    Jolles, S.
    Kaveri, S. V.
    Orange, J.
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2009, 158 : 68 - 70
  • [2] Imaging of high-risk carotid artery plaques: current status and future directions
    DeMarco, J. Kevin
    Huston, John, III
    [J]. NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2014, 36 (01)
  • [3] CURRENT STATUS - FUTURE DIRECTIONS
    MATTHEWS, JL
    [J]. CALCIFIED TISSUE RESEARCH, 1978, : 425 - 429
  • [4] Scientific Understanding of the Induced Membrane Technique: Current Status and Future Directions
    Yee, Michael A.
    Mead, Matthew P.
    Alford, Andrea I.
    Hak, David J.
    Mauffrey, Cyril
    Hake, Mark E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2017, 31 : S3 - S8
  • [5] NeuroAIDS, current understanding and future directions
    Black, RJ
    Rausch, DM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROVIROLOGY, 1996, 2 (04) : 230 - 233
  • [6] Immunoglobulins: current understanding and future directions
    Jolles, S.
    Jordan, S. C.
    Orange, J. S.
    van Schaik, I. N.
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2014, 178 : 163 - 168
  • [7] Understanding physician burnout in Oman: current status, cultural influences and future directions
    Al Alawi, Mohammed
    Al Ghailani, Abdullah
    [J]. BJPSYCH INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 21 (02) : 38 - 39
  • [8] Bevacizumab - current status and future directions
    Midgley, R
    Kerr, D
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2005, 16 (07) : 999 - 1004
  • [9] Current status and future directions of The Annals
    Nahata, MC
    [J]. ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2006, 40 (02) : 321 - 322
  • [10] Colletotrichum - current status and future directions
    Cannon, P. F.
    Damm, U.
    Johnston, P. R.
    Weir, B. S.
    [J]. STUDIES IN MYCOLOGY, 2012, (73) : 181 - 213