Statistical models for extreme waves: Comparison of distributions and Monte Carlo simulation of uncertainty

被引:5
|
作者
Gormus, Tahsin [1 ,2 ]
Ayat, Berna [2 ]
Aydogan, Burak [1 ]
机构
[1] Gebze Tech Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Civil Engn, TR-41400 Gebze, Turkey
[2] Yildiz Tech Univ, Fac Civil Engn, Dept Civil Engn, TR-34220 Esenler, Turkey
关键词
Extreme value analysis; Extreme value distributions; Anderson-darling test; Monte Carlo simulation; Mediterranean sea; Black sea; SPATIAL VARIABILITY; CLIMATE; WIND; SEA; HEIGHTS; ATLAS; POWER;
D O I
10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.110820
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
This study evaluates the extreme waves in the Mediterranean and the Black Sea. Annual Maximum Series (AMS), and Partial Duration Series (PDS) of the significant wave heights (Hm0) are used from the ERA5 dataset. Generalized Extreme Value (GEV), Gumbel, Weibull, Lognormal, and Generalized Pareto Distribution (GPD) models are used to predict H-m0 for 50, 100, and 500-years of return periods. The statistical models are compared by using Anderson-Darling test statistics and the best-fitting AMS and PDS models at each grid cell is mapped to depict spatial variability within the study area. The uncertainty of the return levels is estimated by using the Monte Carlo simulation technique. The effect of varying width and temporal location of data window on the results is studied. The highest return levels of Hm0 are found in the Algerian basin, offshore Libya, the Tyrrhenian Sea, and offshore Crimea. The relative performance of statistical models showed that GEV outperformed other AMS models in the 43% of the study area, followed by Gumbel (29%), Lognormal (24%), Weibull (4%). In case of PDS models, Weibull dominates the region by covering 93% of the study area, with the remaining regions being characterized as GPD.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] MONTE-CARLO SIMULATION OF QUANTUM STATISTICAL LATTICE MODELS
    DERAEDT, H
    LAGENDIJK, A
    [J]. PHYSICS REPORTS-REVIEW SECTION OF PHYSICS LETTERS, 1985, 127 (04): : 233 - 307
  • [2] Comparison of statistical enhancement methods for Monte Carlo semiconductor simulation
    Wordelman, CJ
    Kwan, TJT
    Snell, CM
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN OF INTEGRATED CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS, 1998, 17 (12) : 1230 - 1235
  • [3] Simplified models for uncertainty quantification of extreme events using Monte Carlo technique
    Hu, Xiaonong
    Fang, Genshen
    Yang, Jiayu
    Zhao, Lin
    Ge, Yaojun
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2023, 230
  • [4] Evaluation of Measurement Uncertainty Based on the Propagation of Distributions Using Monte Carlo Simulation
    M. Cox
    P. Harris
    B. R.-L. Siebert
    [J]. Measurement Techniques, 2003, 46 : 824 - 833
  • [5] Evaluation of measurement uncertainty based on the propagation of distributions using Monte Carlo simulation
    Cox, M
    Harris, P
    Siebert, BPL
    [J]. MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2003, 46 (09) : 824 - 833
  • [6] TRANSFERRING MONTE CARLO DISTRIBUTIONS IN THE EVALUATION OF UNCERTAINTY
    Willink, Robin
    [J]. ADVANCED MATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTATIONAL TOOLS IN METROLOGY AND TESTING VIII, 2009, 78 : 351 - 356
  • [7] Uncertainty treatment in Monte Carlo simulation
    Weise, K
    Zhang, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSICS A-MATHEMATICAL AND GENERAL, 1997, 30 (17): : 5971 - 5980
  • [8] Uncertainty treatment in Monte Carlo simulation
    Weise, K.
    Zhang, H.
    [J]. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 30 (17):
  • [9] Monte Carlo Simulation of the Statistical Uncertainty of Emission Measurements in an Ideal Reverberation Chamber
    Magdowski, Mathias
    Vick, Ralf
    [J]. 2017 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY - EMC EUROPE, 2017,
  • [10] Statistical ensembles for Monte Carlo simulation
    Wilding, NB
    [J]. COMPUTER SIMULATIONS OF SURFACES AND INTERFACES, 2003, 114 : 95 - 108