Comparison of three techniques for the attachment of radio transmitters to European Starlings

被引:21
|
作者
Woolnough, AP [1 ]
Kirkpatrick, WE [1 ]
Lowe, TJ [1 ]
Rose, K [1 ]
机构
[1] Western Australia Dept Agr, Vertebrate Pest Res Stn, Forrestfield, WA 6058, Australia
关键词
European Starling; passerine; telemetry; transmitter attachment;
D O I
10.1648/0273-8570-75.4.330
中图分类号
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号
071002 ;
摘要
A captive study was conducted to determine the most appropriate method for attaching radio transmitters to a medium-sized (20-100 g) passerine, the European Starling (Sturnus vulgaris). Using mock transmitters, three methods of attachment were tried: a body harness, a glued backpack, and a tail-mount. The harness was the most reliable in terms of duration of attachment, with six of eight attachments (75%) retained by the birds at the completion of the 24-d trial. In contrast, just two of eight (25%) glued backpack attachments remained in place at the conclusion of the study. Tail-mounts performed only slightly better than glued backpacks, with only three of eight tail-mounts remaining in place at the conclusion of the study. Flight, feeding, and perching activities were not affected by the attachments; however, some birds showed initial annoyance toward the mock radio transmitters, inferred by pecking directed at the attachment site. Each attachment method was found to slightly alter the activity (pecking) of the starlings compared to the control group, but this persisted only for the first day following attachment. On the basis of the pecking response, tail-mount attachments were the least aggravating to the birds followed by the harness method. Once adjusted to the attachment, we observed no difference in starling activity, and the body condition of control and treated birds remained similar for the duration of the trials. We recommend the use of the harness for attaching radio transmitters to European Starlings and other similar sized passerines, particularly if birds are expected to molt during the experimental period.
引用
收藏
页码:330 / 336
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] RADIO TRANSMITTERS FOR MOURNING DOVES - A COMPARISON OF ATTACHMENT TECHNIQUES
    PERRY, MC
    HAAS, GH
    CARPENTER, JW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1981, 45 (02): : 524 - 527
  • [2] SUTURE AND GLUE ATTACHMENT OF RADIO TRANSMITTERS ON DUCKS
    WHEELER, WE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FIELD ORNITHOLOGY, 1991, 62 (02) : 271 - 278
  • [3] ATTACHMENT METHOD FOR RADIO TRANSMITTERS ON MALLARD DUCKLINGS
    ORTHMEYER, DL
    [J]. CALIFORNIA FISH AND GAME, 1991, 77 (01): : 22 - 26
  • [4] A comparison of five techniques for attaching radio-transmitters to tropical passerine birds
    Hansbauer, Miriam M.
    Pimentel, Rafael G.
    [J]. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ORNITOLOGIA, 2008, 16 (02) : 131 - 136
  • [5] NEW HARNESS DESIGN FOR ATTACHMENT OF RADIO TRANSMITTERS TO SMALL PASSERINES
    RAPPOLE, JH
    TIPTON, AR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FIELD ORNITHOLOGY, 1991, 62 (03) : 335 - 337
  • [6] Pulse delay techniques for PPM impulse radio transmitters
    Buchegger, T
    Ossberger, G
    Reisenzahn, A
    Stelzer, A
    Springer, A
    [J]. 2003 IEEE CONFERENCE ON ULTRA WIDEBAND SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 37 - 41
  • [7] Adaptive Techniques to Mitigate Oscillator Pulling in Radio Transmitters
    Li Puma, Giuseppe
    Avivi, Rotem
    Carbonne, Christophe
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS II-EXPRESS BRIEFS, 2017, 64 (02) : 121 - 125
  • [8] Miniaturization (0.2 g) and evaluation of attachment techniques of telemetry transmitters
    Naef-Daenzer, B
    Früh, D
    Stalder, M
    Wetli, P
    Weise, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2005, 208 (21): : 4063 - 4068
  • [9] Tail attachment of modified ear-tag radio transmitters on beavers
    Rothmeyer, SW
    McKinstry, MC
    Anderson, SH
    [J]. WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN, 2002, 30 (02): : 425 - 429
  • [10] Evaluation of two techniques for attaching radio transmitters to turkey poults
    Bowman, J
    Wallace, MC
    Ballard, WB
    Brunjes, JH
    Miller, MS
    Hellman, JM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FIELD ORNITHOLOGY, 2002, 73 (03) : 276 - 280