Race and gender differences in abnormal blood glucose screening and clinician response to prediabetes: A mixed-methods assessment

被引:6
|
作者
Thomas, Tainayah W. [1 ]
Golin, Carol [2 ]
Samuel-Hodge, Carmen D. [3 ]
Kirkman, M. Sue [4 ]
Golden, Shelley D. [5 ]
Lightfoot, Alexandra F. [6 ]
机构
[1] Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Behav, 310 Rosenau Hall,CB 7440, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] UNC CH Sch Med, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Behav, Dept Med, 310 Rosenau Hall,CB 7440, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Dept Nutr, 1700 Martin Luther King Jr Blvd,Room 216,CB 7426, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[4] Dept Med, Div Endocrinol & Metab, 300 Meadowmont Village Cir Ste 201, Chapel Hill, NC 27517 USA
[5] Univ N Carolina, Dept Hlth Behav, 364 Rosenau Hall,CB 7440, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[6] Univ N Carolina, Dept Hlth Behav, 1700 Martin Luther King,Jr Blvd,CB 7426, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
Prediabetes; Diabetes prevention; Health disparities; HEALTH; PREVALENCE; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106587
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The projected three-fold increase in diabetes burden by 2060 in the United States will affect certain race and gender groups disproportionately. The objective of this mixed-methods study was to assess differences in prediabetes screening and clinician response to prediabetes by patient race and gender. We utilized data from 18,742 patients seen between 11/1/15 and 4/30/17 who met criteria for blood glucose screening by the 2015 US Preventive Service Task Force recommendation and had at least one visit to a primary care practice within a large, academic health system located in North Carolina. We utilized generalized estimating equations with logistic regression to assess race and gender differences in two outcomes: prediabetes screening and clinician response to prediabetes. We conducted twenty in-depth interviews (October 2018-May 2019) with physicians to assess their approach to screening for and treating prediabetes. Black patients had 11% higher odds (95% CI:1.02-1.20) of being screened for prediabetes than White patients. Men had 19% higher odds (95% CI:1.09-1.30) of being screened for prediabetes than women. There were no significant differences in clinician response to prediabetes by patient race or gender. Qualitatively, physicians reported a non-systematic approach to prediabetes screening and follow-up care related to: 1) System-level barriers to screening and treatment; 2) Implicit bias; 3) Patient factors; and 4) Physician preferences for prediabetes treatment. Targeted risk-based screening for prediabetes along with increased treatment for prediabetes are critical for preventing diabetes and reducing diabetes-related disparities.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patient and Clinician Perceptions of Prediabetes: A Mixed-Methods Primary Care Study
    Roper, Karen L.
    Thomas, Alisha R.
    Hieronymus, Laura
    Brock, Audrey
    Keck, James
    [J]. DIABETES EDUCATOR, 2019, 45 (03): : 302 - 314
  • [2] Gender Differences in Domestic Responsibilities of Otolaryngologists-A Mixed-Methods Analysis
    Graham, M. Elise
    Aleksa, Emily
    Dzioba, Agnieszka
    Madou, Edward
    Chen, Tanya
    Strychowsky, Julie E.
    Hu, Amanda
    Chan, Yvonne
    Seemann, Natashia M.
    [J]. LARYNGOSCOPE, 2024,
  • [3] A Mixed-Methods Study of Gender Differences in Nurse Reporting and Nurse Discipline
    Smiley, Richard A.
    McCarthy, Carey
    [J]. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 2016, 7 (03) : 33 - 40
  • [4] Did the 2015 USPSTF Abnormal Blood Glucose Recommendations Change Clinician Attitudes or Behaviors? A Mixed-Method Assessment
    Tainayah W. Thomas
    Carol E. Golin
    Alan C. Kinlaw
    M. Sue Kirkman
    Shelley D. Golden
    Alexandra F. Lightfoot
    Carmen D. Samuel-Hodge
    [J]. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2022, 37 : 15 - 22
  • [5] Race and Gender in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Clerkship: A Mixed Methods Assessment
    Young, Omar M.
    Sonn, Tammy
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 134 : 59S - 59S
  • [6] Did the 2015 USPSTF Abnormal Blood Glucose Recommendations Change Clinician Attitudes or Behaviors? A Mixed-Method Assessment
    Thomas, Tainayah W.
    Golin, Carol E.
    Kinlaw, Alan C.
    Kirkman, M. Sue
    Golden, Shelley D.
    Lightfoot, Alexandra F.
    Samuel-Hodge, Carmen D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2022, 37 (01) : 15 - 22
  • [7] Clinician Perspectives on Providing Concussion Assessment and Management via Telehealth: A Mixed-Methods Study
    van Ierssel, Jacqueline
    O'Neil, Jennifer
    King, Judy
    Zemek, Roger
    Sveistrup, Heidi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEAD TRAUMA REHABILITATION, 2023, 38 (03) : E233 - E243
  • [8] Gender Differences in Drug Offers of Rural Hawaiian Youths: A Mixed-Methods Analysis
    Okamoto, Scott K.
    Kulis, Stephen
    Helm, Susana
    Edwards, Christopher
    Giroux, Danielle
    [J]. AFFILIA-JOURNAL OF WOMEN AND SOCIAL WORK, 2010, 25 (03): : 291 - 306
  • [9] Gender Differences in Caring for Children with Genetic or Rare Diseases: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Chu, Shao-Yin
    Wen, Chin-Chen
    Weng, Chun-Ying
    [J]. CHILDREN-BASEL, 2022, 9 (05):
  • [10] Race and Gender Differences in Attitudes Toward Help Seeking Among Marginalized Young Adults With Mood Disorders: A Mixed-Methods Investigation
    Narendorf, Sarah C.
    Munson, Michelle R.
    Ben-David, Shelly
    Cole, Andrea R.
    Scott, Lionel D., Jr.
    [J]. PSYCHIATRIC REHABILITATION JOURNAL, 2018, 41 (04) : 277 - 289