Comparing the results of duraplasty using amniotic membrane versus pericranium as dural graft; concerning CSF leakage and pseudomeningocele

Purpose: In many brain surgeries, dura cannot be primarily repaired and it is necessary to use a graft. Appropriate repair of dura plays a major role in preventing CSF leakage and meningitis. In the cases where sufficient Pericranium is not available for recovery, we need to use graft from other resources. The present study compares the results of amniotic membrane dural graft and pericranium dural graft in terms of CSF leakage and Pseudomeningocele. Materials and methods: This is a semi-empirical research. Thirty cases underwent dural graft with amnion membrane because of inadequate local pericranium for repair. There were 30 other historical cases that had undergone auto-graft dural graft with Pericranium in the same center. Results: The average age of the participants in Pericranium graft group (P, n = 30) and those in amniotic graft group (A, n = 30) was 39.1 +/- 15 and 43.9 +/- 19 years old, respectively. As for the P and A groups, there were 14 and 17 males, respectively. Two cases of CSF leakage (7%) were observed in P group, while none was reported in A group. There were 3 cases (10%) of meningitis in Pericranium group and 2 cases (7%) were reported in amnion group. Out of 2 cases of meningitis in group P, 2 cases were associated with CSF leak. 5 cases of Hydrocephalus (17%) were observed in group P and 9 cases (30%) were reported in group A. No significant difference was observed between the two groups in any complication. The frequency of hydrocephalus was significantly higher in posterior fossa craniotomy. Conclusion: Amniotic membrane may provide a good source for cases with a large dural defect and can be utilized for all ages. Of course, its application in cases of posterior fossa craniotomy needs to be carefully studied so that the best results may be obtained.