Doing Case Study: Abduction Not Induction, Phronesis Not Theory

被引:117
|
作者
Thomas, Gary [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Sch Educ, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
关键词
Case study; abduction; phronesis; theory; GROUNDED THEORY;
D O I
10.1177/1077800410372601
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Distinctions between abduction and induction, and between phronesis and theory, are often elided in methodological discussion about case study. Making these distinctions clear offers a pathway for the better conduct of case study and for a less apologetic stance in its use. Owing its legitimacy to the experiential knowledge of phronesis rather than the generalizing power of induction and theory in explanation and prediction, case study can more unselfconsciously look to the anatomy of narrative for the justification of its processes and its conclusions. A look at this anatomy reveals a number of ways in which the valency of case study may be constructed.
引用
收藏
页码:575 / 582
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条