The offspring quantity - quality trade-off and human fertility variation

被引:50
|
作者
Lawson, David W. [1 ]
Mulder, Monique Borgerhoff [2 ]
机构
[1] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Dept Populat Hlth, London WC1, England
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Anthropol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
life-history theory; demographic transition; parental investment; PARENTAL INVESTMENT; CLUTCH SIZE; SIBLING COMPETITION; EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; NATURAL-SELECTION; SEXUAL CONFLICT; FAMILY-SIZE; FITNESS; MANIPULATION;
D O I
10.1098/rstb.2015.0145
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The idea that trade-offs between offspring quantity and quality shape reproductive behaviour has long been central to economic perspectives on fertility. It also has a parallel and richer theoretical foundation in evolutionary ecology. We review the application of the quantity-quality trade-off concept to human reproduction, emphasizing distinctions between clutch size and lifetime fertility, and the wider set of forces contributing to fertility variation in iteroparous and sexually reproducing species like our own. We then argue that in settings approximating human evolutionary history, several factors limit costly sibling competition. Consequently, while the optimization of quantity-quality trade-offs undoubtedly shaped the evolution of human physiology setting the upper limits of reproduction, we argue it plays a modest role in accounting for socio-ecological and individual variation in fertility. Only upon entering the demographic transition can fertility limitation be clearly interpreted as strategically orientated to advancing offspring quality via increased parental investment per child, with low fertility increasing descendant socio-economic success, although not reproductive success. We conclude that existing economic and evolutionary literature has often overemphasized the centrality of quantity-quality trade-offs to human fertility variation and advocate for the development of more holistic frameworks encompassing alternative life-history trade-offs and the evolved mechanisms guiding their resolution.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quality-quantity trade-off of human offspring under adverse environmental conditions
    Meij, J. J.
    Van Bodegom, D.
    Ziem, J. B.
    Amankwa, J.
    Polderman, A. M.
    Kirkwood, T. B. L.
    De Craen, A. J. M.
    Zwaan, B. J.
    Westendorp, R. G. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2009, 22 (05) : 1014 - 1023
  • [2] The quality-quantity trade-off
    McCannon B.C.
    [J]. Eastern Economic Journal, 2008, 34 (1) : 95 - 100
  • [3] Is the Quantity-Quality Trade-Off a Trade-Off for All, None, or Some?
    Millimet, Daniel L.
    Wang, Le
    [J]. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND CULTURAL CHANGE, 2011, 60 (01) : 155 - 195
  • [4] A trade-off between quantity and quality of offspring in haematophagous ectoparasites: the effect of the level of specialization
    Khokhlova, Irina S.
    Pilosof, Shai
    Fielden, Laura J.
    Degen, A. Allan
    Krasnov, Boris R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 2014, 83 (02) : 397 - 405
  • [5] The quantity and quality of teachers: Dynamics of the trade-off
    Gilpin, Gregory
    Kaganovich, Michael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2012, 96 (3-4) : 417 - 429
  • [6] THE TRADE-OFF BETWEEN CHILD QUANTITY AND QUALITY
    HANUSHEK, EA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1992, 100 (01) : 84 - 117
  • [7] Human capital and the quantity–quality trade-off during the demographic transition
    Alan Fernihough
    [J]. Journal of Economic Growth, 2017, 22 : 35 - 65
  • [8] Quantity quality trade-off of children and school finance
    Yilmaz, Kuzey
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MACROECONOMICS, 2018, 56 : 188 - 203
  • [9] Occupational Variation in Quantity-Quality Trade-off in a Brawn-Based Economy
    Sarkar, Jayanta
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 2021, 57 (05): : 824 - 841
  • [10] Optimizing the Quantity/Quality Trade-Off in Connectome Inference
    Priebe, Carey E.
    Vogelstein, Joshua
    Bock, Davi
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-THEORY AND METHODS, 2013, 42 (19) : 3455 - 3462