A comparison of dexmedetomidine versus midazolam for sedation, pain and hemodynamic control, during colonoscopy under conscious sedation

被引:85
|
作者
Dere, Kamer [1 ]
Sucullu, Ilker [2 ]
Budak, Ersel Tan
Yeyen, Suleyman
Filiz, Ali Ilker [2 ]
Ozkan, Sezai
Dagli, Guner
机构
[1] GATA Haydarpasa Training Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Div Algol, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] GATA Haydarpasa Training Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
colonoscopy; dexmedetomidine; hemodynamics; midazolam; sedation; COMBINATION; ENDOSCOPY; RECOVERY; AGONISTS;
D O I
10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283347bfe
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objective The intent of our study was to compare the effects of dexmedetomidine versus midazolam on perioperative hemodynamics, sedation, pain, satisfaction and recovery scores during colonoscopy. Material and methods A total of 60 ASA I-II patients, between 20 and 80 years of age were included in the study. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups. Midazolam 0.05 mg kg(-1) and fentanyl citrate 1 mu g kg(-1) were administered intravenously to cases in Group I (n=30). An initial loading dose of 1 mu g kg(-1) dexmedetomidine was administered intravenously in 10 min to cases in Group II (n=30) before the procedure and as a continuous infusion dose of 0.5 mu g kg(-1) h(-1) just before the procedure started. Also 1 mu g kg(-1) fentanyl citrate was administered intravenously immediately before the procedure. Peripheral oxygen saturation (Spo(2)), mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) scores and colonoscopist satisfaction scores of the cases were recorded. Results Although statistically significant values were not detected between the two groups with regard to mean arterial pressure, in Group I heart rates were higher and Spo(2) scores were lower in a statistically significant manner. When the groups were compared with regard to RSS, the RSS scores of Group I at the 10th and 15th minutes were significantly lower than Group II. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups when compared with regard to NRS scores. Satisfaction scores were significantly lower in Group II. Conclusion Dexmedetomidine provides more efficient hemodynamic stability, higher Ramsay sedation scale scores, higher satisfaction scores and lower NRS scores in colonoscopies. According to our results we believe that dexmedetomidine can be used safely as a sedoanalgesic agent in colonoscopies. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010;27:648-652
引用
收藏
页码:648 / 652
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of Dexmedetomidine with Fentanyl for Sedation, Pain and Hemodynamic Control during Central Line Insertion in Intensive Care Unit under Conscious Sedation
    Santhisree, M.
    Prasad, P. Krishna
    Lakshmi, B. Sowbhagya
    Krishnaveni, N.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC STUDY, 2014, 2 (08) : 1 - 4
  • [2] Conscious Sedation for Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: Dexmedetomidine Versus Midazolam
    Kilic, Neslihan
    Sahin, Sukran
    Aksu, Hale
    Yavascaoglu, Belgin
    Gurbet, Alp
    Turker, Gurkan
    Kadioglu, Asli Guler
    [J]. EURASIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2011, 43 (01): : 13 - 17
  • [3] A comparison of propofol vs. dexmedetomidine for sedation, haemodynamic control and satisfaction, during esophagogastroduodenoscopy under conscious sedation
    Wu, Y.
    Zhang, Y.
    Hu, X.
    Qian, C.
    Zhou, Y.
    Xie, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2015, 40 (04) : 419 - 425
  • [4] Effects of conscious sedation with midazolam on the cardiopulmonary function during colonoscopy
    Kim, Y. H.
    Kim, J. W.
    Choi, M. Y.
    Joo, S. K.
    Kim, W.
    Jung, Y. J.
    Jeong, J. B.
    Kim, B. G.
    Lee, K. L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2011, 26 : 131 - 132
  • [5] Effect of midazolam on cardiopulmonary function during colonoscopy with conscious sedation
    Kim, Young Hoon
    Kim, Ji Won
    Lee, Kook Lae
    Joo, Sae Kyung
    Lee, Jaekyung
    Koh, Seong-Joon
    Kim, Byeong Gwan
    Park, Chan-Kuk
    [J]. DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2014, 26 (03) : 417 - 423
  • [6] Midazolam versus diazepam in lipid emulsion as conscious sedation for colonoscopy with or without reversal of sedation with flumazenil
    Macken, E
    Gevers, AM
    Hendrickx, A
    Rutgeerts, P
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1998, 47 (01) : 57 - 61
  • [7] The effect comparison of midazolam and dexmedetomidine used in conscious sedation during endoscopic variceal ligation
    Zhang, T.
    Li, K.
    Li, J. N.
    [J]. BASIC & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 2018, 123 : 82 - 83
  • [8] Comparison of propofol sedation versus conscious sedation during endosonography
    Nayar, DS
    Feuerman, M
    Scheinberg, L
    Gress, F
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2004, 59 (05) : AB126 - AB126
  • [9] Comparison of Dexmedetomidine and Midazolam in Conscious Sedation During Dental Implant Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Guldiken, Ipek N.
    Gurler, Gokhan
    Delilbasi, Cagri
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2021, 36 (06) : E158 - E164
  • [10] COMPARISON OF DEXMEDETOMIDINE AND MIDAZOLAM SEDATION AND ANTAGONISM OF DEXMEDETOMIDINE WITH ATIPAMEZOLE
    AHO, M
    ERKOLA, O
    KALLIO, A
    SCHEININ, H
    KORTTILA, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 1993, 5 (03) : 194 - 203