The U.S.-China Trade War: Is Food China's Most Powerful Weapon?

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang Hangzhou [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Nanyang Technol Univ, China Programme, S Rajaratnam Sch Int Studies, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, Lee Kuan Yew Sch Publ Policy, Singapore, Singapore
来源
ASIA POLICY | 2020年 / 15卷 / 03期
关键词
U.S.-CHINA TRADE WAR; FOOD POWER; FOOD SECURITY; STRATEGIC RIVALRY; POLITICAL-ECONOMY; WORLD FOOD;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ;
摘要
This article examines the concept of "food power," analyzes China's use of food as a foreign policy instrument against the U.S. in the context of their trade war, and considers the potential implications. MAIN ARGUMENT The food power balance between the U.S. and China is affected by four key factors: scarcity, the concentration of supply, the degree of demand dispersion, and action independence. Since emerging as the leading food importer, China has successfully tipped the food power balance in its favor through overseas agricultural investment, import diversification, and cultivation of its own global agribusiness. In addition, the global food glut and the critical importance of rural support for Donald Trump's re-election campaign further increase China's leverage in bilateral food trade. With this newly gained food power, the Chinese government, which used to be a victim of U.S. food embargoes, has started using food as a foreign policy instrument to influence U.S. policy amid the ongoing trade war. While China appears to have achieved limited success against the Trump administration through food power, the potential costs to both China and the world of weaponizing food trade could be huge. POLICY IMPLICATIONS While it is understandable that China seeks to leverage its newly gained food power against the U.S., serious caution must be exercised. There are severe liabilities for the global economy and adverse effects for both countries when food is weaponized. So long as the food relationship is relatively symmetrical, the political leverage that food provides China against the U.S. is ephemeral because the balance of food power could easily be tipped in either direction. Given China's increasing dependence on the global market for its food supply, a stable and flourishing food trade system will be critical to the country's overall food security. This means that attempts by China to use food as a foreign policy instrument are ultimately counterproductive.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 86
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Understanding the U.S.-China Trade War
    Liu, Tao
    Woo, Wing Thye
    [J]. CHINA ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2018, 11 (03) : 319 - 340
  • [2] The U.S.-China Trade War and Policy Resilience
    Ashbee, Edward
    Hurst, Steven
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AMERICAN-EAST ASIAN RELATIONS, 2023, 30 (02) : 188 - 215
  • [3] U.S.-China trade war and competitive advantage of Vietnam
    Dhar, Bablu Kumar
    Tiep Le, Thanh
    Coffelt, Tina A.
    Shaturaev, Jakhongir
    [J]. THUNDERBIRD INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2023, 65 (02) : 255 - 263
  • [4] U.S.-China Trade War and Its Global Impacts
    Steinbock, Dan
    [J]. CHINA QUARTERLY OF INTERNATIONAL STRATEGIC STUDIES, 2018, 4 (04) : 515 - 542
  • [5] U.S.-China Trade, 1971-2012: Insights into the U.S.-China Relationship
    Wang, Dong
    [J]. ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL-JAPAN FOCUS, 2013, 11 (24):
  • [6] U.S.-China Trade Relations and Economic Distrust
    Chen, Edward I-Hsin
    [J]. CHINESE ECONOMY, 2014, 47 (03) : 57 - 69
  • [7] U.S.-China Tech War Impacts and Prospects
    Sun Haiyong
    [J]. CHINA QUARTERLY OF INTERNATIONAL STRATEGIC STUDIES, 2019, 5 (02) : 197 - 212
  • [8] U.S.-China "Extreme Competition" and the Drumbeat of War
    Thornton, Susan
    [J]. ASIA POLICY, 2022, 17 (04): : 240 - 243
  • [9] U.S.-CHINA RELATIONS IN 2018-2019: TRADE WAR AND THE PROCESS OF DECOUPLING
    Leksyutina, Yana, V
    [J]. MIROVAYA EKONOMIKA I MEZHDUNARODNYE OTNOSHENIYA, 2020, 64 (06): : 85 - 93
  • [10] The Current World-System and Conflicts Understanding the U.S.-China Trade War
    Hlovor, Ishmael
    Mawuko-Yevugah, Lord
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WORLD-SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2024, 30 (02) : 583 - 609