The South China Sea Arbitration and the Finality of 'Final' Awards
被引:13
|
作者:
Talmon, Stefan
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Bonn, St Annes Coll, Inst Publ Int Law, 20 Essex St Chambers, Bonn, GermanyUniv Bonn, St Annes Coll, Inst Publ Int Law, 20 Essex St Chambers, Bonn, Germany
Talmon, Stefan
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ Bonn, St Annes Coll, Inst Publ Int Law, 20 Essex St Chambers, Bonn, Germany
On 12 July 2016, the arbitral tribunal constituted under Annex VII of the United Nations (UN) Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) issued its award in the South China Sea Arbitration between the Philippines and China. According to Article 11 of Annex VII, the award of the arbitral tribunal shall be 'final'. The provision reiterates the general statement in Article 296(1) UNCLOS that any decision rendered by a court or tribunal having jurisdiction under part XV, section 2, of UNCLOS shall be 'final'. In its award, the tribunal decided a number of general questions of the law of the sea, including the meaning of the term 'rocks' in and the relationship between UNCLOS and customary international law. This article examines what 'finality' of an arbitral award means with regard to decisions on such general questions of law or, in other words, in what way such decisions can be considered 'final'.
机构:
Guangdong Acad Social Sci, Inst Int Studies, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R ChinaGuangdong Acad Social Sci, Inst Int Studies, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
机构:
Jawaharlal Nehru Univ, Sch Int Studies, Ctr East Asian Studies, New Delhi, IndiaJawaharlal Nehru Univ, Sch Int Studies, Ctr East Asian Studies, New Delhi, India