Endovascular Aortic Repair Follow up Protocol Based on Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Is Safe and Effective

被引:22
|
作者
Chisci, Emiliano [1 ]
Harris, Linda [2 ]
Guidotti, Azzurra [1 ]
Pecchioli, Angelica [1 ]
Pigozzi, Clara [1 ]
Barbanti, Enrico [1 ]
Ercolini, Leonardo [3 ]
Michelagnoli, Stefano [1 ]
机构
[1] San Giovanni di Dio Hosp, Usl Toscana Ctr, Dept Surg, Vasc & Endovasc Surg Unit, Florence, Italy
[2] Univ Buffalo State Univ New York, Div Vasc Surg, Buffalo, NY USA
[3] S Donato Hosp, Vasc & Endovasc Surg Unit, Cardiovasc Dept, Arezzo, Italy
关键词
Endovascular aortic repair follow-up; Contrast-enhanced ultrasound; Computed tomography angiography; Endovascular aortic repair; Endoleaks; Abdominal aortic aneurysm; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY; ANEURYSM REPAIR; DUPLEX ULTRASOUND; EVAR; SURVEILLANCE; ENDOLEAK; METAANALYSIS; CEUS; CT; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.03.006
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: The aim of this study was to define the safety and effectiveness of a contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) based follow up for endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) surveillance at a mid-term period (4 years). Methods: At the tertiary referral centre EVAR surveillance was based on plain abdominal radiograph and duplex ultrasound (CDU), with computed tomography angiography (CTA) reserved for any non-diagnostic imaging during the period 1999-2011 (Group A). From 2012, CEUS was performed when (a) any endoleak was detected at CDU, (b) sac growth > 5 mm within 6 months, and routinely for (c) patients with renal insufficiency (above Stage 3 chronic kidney disease), or (d) iodine contrast allergy (Group B). Results: A total of 880 patients (mean age 75.6 +/- 8.4 years; 824 male) who underwent EVAR between 1999 and 2015 and with a minimum of 1 year follow up were included. Six hundred and nineteen patients were in Group A (70%) and the remaining 261 in Group B (30%). Median follow up was 48 months (interquartile range 24-84). During the study period 318 CEUS scans were performed with no related complications. Indications for CEUS were the following: (a) 160 (50%) endoleak presence, (b) 34 (11%) significant sac expansions, (c) 91 (29%) renal insufficiency (Stage 3 or above CKD), and 33 (10%) iodine contrast allergies. CEUS was compared with CTA, with additional confirmation by angiographic and operative findings in the case of repair in the first 100 patients. CEUS had 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity in classifying endoleaks. No differences in endoleak, re-interventions and sac shrinkage percentage were seen between the two groups at 4 years. A 4 year analysis of CTA use found a 90% reduction with the introduction of CEUS. Conclusions: The introduction of a CEUS based protocol for EVAR follow up was safe and effective and it was similar to the previous CTA based follow up protocol with regard to identification of endoleaks in a mid-term period. Moreover, CEUS allowed for 90% reduction of CTA, thereby decreasing radiation exposure for patients. (C) 2018 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 47
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Endovascular Aortic Repair Follow-Up Protocol Based on Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Is Safe and Effective in a Midterm Period
    Chisci, Emiliano
    Guidotti, Azzurra
    Pigozzi, Clara
    Pecchioli, Angelica
    Alberti, Aldo
    Lombardi, Renzo
    Ercolini, Leonardo
    Michelagnoli, Stefano
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2017, 65 (06) : 140S - 140S
  • [2] Follow up of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair with contrast ultrasound
    Deklunder, G.
    Sediri, I.
    Donati, T.
    Boivin, V.
    Gautier, C.
    Haulon, S.
    JOURNAL DE RADIOLOGIE, 2009, 90 (01): : 141 - 147
  • [3] Use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in follow-up after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair
    McWilliams, RG
    Martin, J
    White, D
    Gould, DA
    Harris, PL
    Fear, SC
    Brennan, J
    Gilling-Smith, GL
    Bakran, A
    Rowlands, PC
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 1999, 10 (08) : 1107 - 1114
  • [4] Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Follow-Up of Endoleaks after Endovascular Aortic Repair (EVAR)
    Ruebenthaler, Johannes
    Zimmermann, Hanna
    Armbruster, Marco
    Mueller-Peltzer, Katharina
    Bogner, Florian
    Reiser, Maximilian
    Clevert, Dirk-Andre
    ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN, 2017, 38 (03): : 244 - 259
  • [5] Role of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Follow-Up after Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair
    Benedetto, Filippo
    Spinelli, Domenico
    La Corte, Francesco
    Pipito, Narayana
    Passari, Gabriele
    De Caridi, Giovanni
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 12 (12)
  • [6] Role of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Follow-up of Endo-Vascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair: an Effective and Safe Surveillance Method
    Giannoni, Maria Fabrizia
    Citone, Michele
    Rossi, Michele
    Speziale, Francesco
    David, Vincenzo
    CURRENT PHARMACEUTICAL DESIGN, 2012, 18 (15) : 2214 - 2222
  • [7] Comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and compression elastography in the follow-up after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair
    Guertler, V. M.
    Rjosk-Dendorfer, D.
    Reiser, M.
    Clevert, D. A.
    CLINICAL HEMORHEOLOGY AND MICROCIRCULATION, 2014, 57 (02) : 175 - 183
  • [8] Contrast-Enhanced ultrasound in endovascular aneurysm repair follow-up: Our experience
    Busoni, Cristina
    Frigerio, Dalmazio
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 7 (03) : 237 - 240
  • [9] Endovascular aneurysm repair follow-up by unenhanced and contrast-enhanced duplex ultrasound
    Sarlon, G.
    Lapierre, F.
    Sarlon, E.
    Bartoli, M. -A.
    Magnan, P. E.
    Branchereau, A.
    JOURNAL DES MALADIES VASCULAIRES, 2009, 34 (01) : 34 - 43
  • [10] Initial experience with Duplex scan combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound for follow-up of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair
    Faustino, Carolina Brito
    Ventura, Carlos
    Cassino Portugal, Maria Fernanda
    Brunheroto, Andre
    Teivelis, Marcelo Passos
    Wolosker, Nelson
    JORNAL VASCULAR BRASILEIRO, 2021, 20