Investigating the impact of personality traits on perceived usability evaluation of e-learning platforms

被引:11
|
作者
Vlachogianni, Prokopia [1 ]
Tselios, Nikolaos [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Patras, Dept Educ Sci & Early Childhood Educ, Patras, Greece
关键词
Usability; Personality; E-learning; User experience; System usability scale (SUS); Adjective rating scale; Big; 5; Learning management systems (LMS); Educational technology; Primary education; Secondary education; User Studies; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE; EMPIRICAL-EVALUATION; USER SATISFACTION; SELF-EFFICACY; MODEL; METAANALYSIS; ACHIEVEMENT; CONTINUITY; PATTERNS; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1108/ITSE-02-2021-0024
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact of personality traits on the perceived usability evaluation of e-learning platforms. In specific, perceived usability levels of the educational platforms and tools used in primary and secondary education in Greece are demonstrated. The impact which personality traits and other individual-related factors have on the perceived usability were also examined. Design/methodology/approach In total, 2,239 Greek primary and secondary education teachers participated in the study through an online survey. The system usability scale (SUS) and Big 5 personality test questionnaires were adopted, as well as a demographics questionnaire and nine platforms were examined: e-me, eclass, Google Classroom, Microsoft Teams, Cisco Webex, Edmodo, Padlet, Skype and Zoom. Findings Most platforms were rated as satisfactory in terms of perceived usability as measured by SUS. SUS scores were not found to be significantly related with participants' age, gender, private/public school, working relationship. Furthermore, openness to new experience and extraversion demonstrated the strongest positive correlation with perceived usability evaluation. Research limitations/implications The current study used a sample of Greek teachers as participants, so the generalizability of results without considering cultural or organizational issues is of questionable validity. The Big 5 personality test is widely adopted; however, it seems that it does not capture comprehensively all possible dimensions of personality. Practical implications Acknowledging the correlations between personality traits and perceived usability for each platform, teachers may now choose the most user-friendly one depending on the personality traits. Designers can adapt their systems to meet users' needs accordingly. Moreover, the reported results provide a frame of reference for the respective organizations and companies to compare the quality of user experience of their products and services. Thus, development costs of an e-learning platform/tool can be reduced accordingly. Social implications Text. Originality/value Perceived usability of a technological system affects the way users interact with it and consequently the whole learning experience. Thus, factors which may affect perceived usability and, in turn, the learning outcomes are of paramount importance and should be exhaustively examined. Giving that personality affects or is related to, other parameters related with technology (technology adoption, perceived and actual use, acceptance, interaction, perceived ease of use), this study addresses a significant research gap and sheds light to the before-mentioned issues.
引用
收藏
页码:202 / 221
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The relationship between perceived usability, personality traits and learning gain in an e-learning context
    Vlachogianni, Prokopia
    Tselios, Nikolaos
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION AND LEARNING TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 39 (01) : 70 - 81
  • [2] A literature review about usability evaluation methods for e-learning platforms
    Freire, Luciana Lopes
    Arezes, Pedro Miguel
    Campos, Jose Creissac
    [J]. WORK-A JOURNAL OF PREVENTION ASSESSMENT & REHABILITATION, 2012, 41 : 1038 - 1044
  • [3] An Impact of Personality Traits and Recollection & Retention Skill in E-Learning
    Arockiam, L.
    Selvaraj, J. Charles
    Devi, S. Amala
    [J]. GLOBAL TRENDS IN INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS, PT 2, 2012, 270 : 357 - +
  • [4] Evaluating e-learning platforms for Schools: Use and usability, user acceptance, and impact on learning
    Stergioulas, Lampros
    Abbasi, Munir
    Xydopoulos, Georgios
    Fakhimi, Masoud
    Margineanu, Ruxandra
    Rifon, Luis Anido
    Iglesias, Manuel Fernandez
    [J]. 2014 14TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES (ICALT), 2014, : 19 - +
  • [5] The Role of Cognitive Styles in Investigating E-Learning Usability
    Zamzuri, Norol Hamiza
    Kassim, Erne Suzila
    Shahrom, Melissa
    [J]. 2010 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-EDUCATION, E-BUSINESS, E-MANAGEMENT AND E-LEARNING: IC4E 2010, PROCEEDINGS, 2010, : 3 - 6
  • [6] Usability studies on E-Learning Platforms: Preliminary Study in USM
    Emang, Devinna Win Anak Boniface
    Lukman, Raja Nurul Izzati Raja
    Kamarulzaman, Muhammad Izzat Syafiq
    Zaaba, Zarul Fitri
    [J]. 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 2017 (ICAST'17), 2017, 1891
  • [7] Usability of e-learning and usability of adaptive e-learning: a literature review
    Mazon-Fierro, Monica
    Mauricio, David
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS, 2022, 9 (01) : 1 - 31
  • [8] An approach to usability evaluation of e-learning applications
    Ardito C.
    Costabile M.F.
    De Marsico M.
    Lanzilotti R.
    Levialdi S.
    Roselli T.
    Rossano V.
    [J]. Universal Access in the Information Society, 2006, 4 (3) : 270 - 283
  • [9] Experience with usability evaluation of e-learning systems
    Granić A.
    [J]. Universal Access in the Information Society, 2008, 7 (04) : 209 - 221
  • [10] Usability Evaluation of Adaptive Features in E-Learning
    Batmetan, Johan Reimon
    Mintjelungan, Maxi M.
    Manggopa, Hizkia Kamang
    Kilis, Billy M. H.
    Kembuan, Djubir Ruslan Eddy
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH UPI INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TECHNICAL AND VOCATIONAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING (ICTVET 2018), 2018, 299 : 127 - 129